Why RFP’s: Face to Face Matters

Why RFP’s: Face to Face Matters

In your mind’s eye, picture the following scenario. You are a hiring manager about to begin recruiting candidates for a pivotal position on your marketing team.  You begin the process by disseminating a call for applicants that includes strict submission guidelines.

Each applicant resume must be submitted by a hard date and time and has to be accompanied by a prescribed detail of qualifications along with salary requirements. Any submission that deviates from the published guideline, contain errors, is received after the deadline or exceeds salary range will immediately be disqualified.

Next, you the review all candidate submissions that have made it through your rigorous gate-keeping procedures and allow candidates to email a single round of questions, the answers to which you publish in one group email.

You then schedule one face-to-face meeting or teleconference with each of the remaining qualified applicants and run references checks on your list of finalists.

Finally, and without further interaction with any of the candidates, you make your hiring decision.

Congratulations! You have just hired a key employee using the standard RFP process. But, would you really do that? Would any company do that?

Of course not! After all you are potentially hiring a valuable employee who may become an immediate key contributor to your team.  Further, prior to hiring any candidate, you want to take as much time as is needed to ensure that he or she is qualified not only in terms of ability, experience and salary range, but also in personality, temperament and character as well as being a fit for your company’s culture.

So why do companies continue to embrace a partner selection process that is almost completely void of human contact? Is a single Q&A conference call and one face-to-face presentation really enough interaction to get to know a potential new partner?

We think the answer is clearly, “no.” But inherent to today’s common RFP practices is a lack of time to explore the human side of a potential partner relationship.

Think about this, you might be entering into a contract with a marketing partner who can either make or break your future digital initiatives. Beyond their quantitative qualifications, don’t you want to take the time to understand the qualitative traits of your future agency resource?

Perhaps it’s time to shake the RFP process up a bit. It would make a whole lot more sense if the human resources hiring process was applied to the RFP selection process. WOW! Now there’s an idea!

As constructed today, the RFP process is cold and sterile. You might as well conduct it in a hermetically sealed clean room where everyone is clad in protective suits and helmets and all communication comes via radio transmission or hand signals.

Granted, the standard RFP requirements around price, experience, case studies and solution recommendations all play vital roles in the process, but setting aside time to really get to know your potential new partner is also a critical, yet missing component.

We believe there is a more human-centric approach to this aspect of the RFP process that still protects and maintains objectivity.

Face time is important – for both sides. Without making a worthwhile time investment to understand your potential new partner from all angles– and visa versa – the relationship, such as it is, may never develop and your future initiatives may never get off the ground.

Randy Shaw

BRYTESIGHT: Bright Minds. Foresight. Your Success.

9 年

Couldn't agree more. Very few of us place significant value on commodities but we select key partnerships, and interpret their value as if that is what they are.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gary T. Hooker的更多文章

  • IMAGINUITY HOSTS SUCCESSFUL DESIGN THINKING EVENT

    IMAGINUITY HOSTS SUCCESSFUL DESIGN THINKING EVENT

    Imaginuity’s first Design Thinking event was a huge success! As you may know, this past Thursday Imaginuity facilitated…

    2 条评论
  • A DIFFERENT WAY THINKING

    A DIFFERENT WAY THINKING

    Buzz phrase and business jargon drive us all crazy. Am I right? They just have a way of getting under our skin.

    2 条评论
  • Think Agencies Can Guarantee the Future? The Myth of Future Proofing

    Think Agencies Can Guarantee the Future? The Myth of Future Proofing

    Stop the Madness Right off the bat, I have a request. Can we please stop using the phrase “Future Proofing?” Allow me…

    1 条评论
  • Criticism When the Competition Loses is Bad for All

    Criticism When the Competition Loses is Bad for All

    Regardless of your personal opinion of The Richards Group (TRG), when a legendary member from within the Dallas agency…

    4 条评论
  • Why RFPs? Time for a Change

    Why RFPs? Time for a Change

    The RFP has been around for decades and it doesn’t seem to be aging gracefully. The process has grown laborious…

  • Why RFPs? The High Low Game

    Why RFPs? The High Low Game

    Price certainly is an important factor of any proposal, but in many cases price alone can disqualify a firm during the…

    3 条评论
  • Why RFPs? A Focused and Level Playing Field

    Why RFPs? A Focused and Level Playing Field

    Over nearly two decades of receiving and analyzing RFPs, we have come to the conclusion that we receive them for one of…

    1 条评论
  • Why RFPs? The Complex and the Confusing

    Why RFPs? The Complex and the Confusing

    More often than not, the RFPs we receive are mind-numbing tomes chock-full of complexity and confusion. Simply getting…

    1 条评论
  • Why RFP’s? Timelines Matter

    Why RFP’s? Timelines Matter

    Whether you know it or not, you may be weeding out the best agencies at the very beginning of the RFP process based on…

  • The RFP: Path to New Business Opportunity or Hopeless Roadblock? Introduction

    The RFP: Path to New Business Opportunity or Hopeless Roadblock? Introduction

    Over the years, we have had the good fortune to work with great clients, many of whom we have had relationships with…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了