Why Pro Bono Mentoring May Not Benefit Start-ups or Mentors
Dr. Kumaresh Krishnamoorthy
Transforming Healthcare Through Innovation | Bridging Medicine, Technology, and Entrepreneurship | National Innovation Mentor | ENT Specialist | Catalyst for Change | Advisory Board Member | Top 25 HealthTech Innovator
Pro bono mentoring—where experienced professionals provide free guidance to start-ups—is often seen as a noble endeavour. It aims to help fledgling companies/start-ups and entrepreneurs navigate the complexities of their early stages without the burden of additional costs. While the intention behind this model is rooted in goodwill, in practice, it often falls short of its goals. Across various industries and geographies, the limitations of pro bono mentoring are becoming increasingly apparent.
This is especially true in the healthcare sector, where finding a professional who understands both the intricacies of the business and the start-up ecosystem—and has a proven track record of success—is rare. The complexity is further heightened by the regulatory requirements that vary across countries. When someone like me, who has navigated these challenges and serves as a board member and advisor, offers services pro bono without any acknowledgment or return of gratitude, it devalues the expertise provided. Without a tangible exchange, the recipient may never fully appreciate the significance or impact of the mentorship.
Here’s a closer look at why pro bono mentoring, despite its good intentions, may not be the best approach for fostering start-up growth, and why a compensated model might offer more sustainable benefits.
The Pitfalls of Pro Bono Mentoring
The Advantages of Paid Mentorship
领英推荐
The Situation in the U.S.: Moving Away from Pro Bono Mentoring
In the U.S., where the start-up ecosystem is highly competitive, there has been a shift away from pro bono mentoring toward more structured and compensated models. While free mentoring does exist, particularly through non-profit organizations, community programs, and CSR initiatives, it is increasingly seen as less effective in structured environments.
My Personal Experience: A Shift from Pro Bono to Paid Mentorship
Over the years, I offered my services pro bono, particularly to many AICs and foundations, believing that my expertise could help guide start-ups toward success. However, I realised that without compensation, the value of my advice was often underestimated, and the engagement from the start-ups was less than ideal. I experienced first-hand the limitations of pro bono mentoring and recognized that for mentorship, especially in healthcare, to be truly effective, it must be a paid engagement acceptable to both sides. Paid mentorship ensures that the guidance provided is valued, respected, and most importantly, acted upon.
Conclusion: A Call for Sustainable Mentorship
While the intention behind pro bono mentoring is commendable, its effectiveness is often compromised by a lack of perceived value and commitment from start-ups. Paid mentorship fosters accountability, fair compensation, and alignment of interests, leading to more meaningful and sustainable relationships. By recognising the importance of compensating mentors for their expertise, start-ups can ensure they receive the guidance they need while building respectful, mutually beneficial partnerships.
For mentorship to be truly effective, it must be recognized as an investment—one that is worth the time, effort, and expertise of both parties involved. Moving away from pro bono mentoring toward a compensated model will ultimately lead to stronger, more impactful relationships and a more vibrant, dynamic start-up ecosystem.