Why Pharma Companies Must Stop Saying ‘Digital Transformation’

Why Pharma Companies Must Stop Saying ‘Digital Transformation’

From education to lunch ordering, from work to dating, talking about “digital” has changed these past months – everything is online. Our entire social network has transformed to such depths that it will be a long time to assess its effects. The operation of entire industries has changed, and, of course, healthcare is no exception. And although we have heard of the digital transformation in medicine for years now, what exactly it covers remains unclear.

I have worked with over 30 different pharmaceutical companies over the past 15 years, giving 100+ keynote speeches around the world live and online. Each one of them explained how they want to transform a conventional company through an organisational course towards a digital switchover. They all say:

  1. We are a conservative company.
  2. We are going through an organisational journey/change.”
  3. We want to embrace digital transformation.

Based on these challenges, they often ask me to talk about the digital transformation and its direct impact on healthcare in my speeches. But I need to be honest: I don’t know what they mean by it. Let me explain why.

The healthcare industry is already using a gazillion of digital solutions. Medical professionals are actively using digital technologies, from mobile communications, telehealth solutions and digital analytics to chatbots and A.I. As such, medicine is going through a similar transformational journey as for example the banking sector did. Pharma companies feel the need to participate in this venture.

It only makes sense to challenge them if it’s a way of working or a way of thinking.

No alt text provided for this image

What IS digital transformation?

I consider myself a geek and I know how it is to live with data. My entire life is filled with technology, covering most facets of my life. I use technology, write about it, analyse reports and publish studies about it. I build my own PC and have been active on most digital channels for years. And still. I wouldn’t call this digital transformation. 

But then again, what is it?

What do pharma executives mean when they talk about digital transformation? 

Would they mean that pharma representatives who go to see doctors can also send them information through a digital channel?

Would they mean all pharma employees should use a health tech that their consumers use to better understand what they are going through (e.g. a health sensor or smartwatch for a healthier life)?

Would they mean all elements of the supply chain to be accessed, verified and analysed as digital data? 

Or can they mean all drug purchases to be tracked at the data level, and used to make better decisions with algorithms – right from drug design?

No alt text provided for this image

Trends shifting healthcare and pharma

There are certain trends that are shaping the future of pharma. Patient design means patient inclusion in key decision-making processes. Integrating A.I. in drug development saves time and money, while 3D printing leads to personalised medicine. Automation supplements the supply chain with more effective solutions, from manufacturing processes to pill dispersion. We pointed out some of the most important changes in healthcare for pharmaceutical companies in this article and in our e-book

This still isn’t digital transformation – these are steps towards; and pharma leaders need to see these technologies and solutions as such.

And not all these changes are digital – they are logical. First of all, no change will come (but a bucketload of money wasted) unless it is preceded by a cultural transformation. Moreover, there is a massive difference between health IT and digital health, and pharma executives tend to forget this fact. 

But, most importantly, none of the above, data, algorithms, sensors, devices, tools, robots, channels, A.I. and the rest of the so-called digital transformational accessories make sense unless understood more deeply and analysed as a strategic concept.

An attempted “digital transformation” will only be understood and executed if pharma companies define what exactly they mean by it in terms of leadership, value creation and vision. 

Without that, this empty phrase keeps on being more destructive than forward-looking.

No alt text provided for this image

Dr. Bertalan Mesko, PhD is The Medical Futurist and Director of The Medical Futurist Institute analyzing how science fiction technologies can become reality in medicine and healthcare. As a geek physician with a PhD in genomics, he is a keynote speaker and an Amazon Top 100 author.

Get access to exclusive content and analyses about the future of digital health on Patreon.com!

Subscribe here for The Medical Futurist newsletter to get exclusive details about digital health!

Bill Gadless

Founding Partner - ??emagineHealth, the Digital-First, AI-Powered Marketing Agency for Healthcare & Biopharma. emagineHealth.com

3 年

I agree very much with an increased emphasis on value and a clearer articulation of what's meant by "digital transformation." Yet at the same time, I still view the industry as still going through very broad/foundational transformation, even 25+ years into this. Sure things like EMRs have been around for quite some time now, but especially this past year the increased adoption of telehealth, virtual clinical trials, and even marketing activities (virtual events, etc.) - the transformation is still quite broad-sweeping.

回复
Stephanie Daireaux

Digital Health | Strategy | Business Design | Innovation

3 年

I agree "digital transformation" is covering too many realities of what's going on in pharma companies: cultural change, data management, acceleration of product development, digital solutions...

Tania Rowland ??

Fractional Chief Reinvention Officer | Advising Courageous Leaders | Future of Work | Team Coach | Sustainable, People & Planet Change

3 年

I'd like to see the commercial side of the business (sales/marketing/support) change the language and focus off the brand to the people they want to support more, asking different questions 'how can we support you today better, faster, and easier?' There needs to be more time spent on seeing the world through the customer's eyes, and then taking a digital-first approach. Unfortunately, many companies are still using the same brand planning playbook and just adding elements to it which is not the right approach in a fast-changing landscape. This anchors people to the old way of working with more steps added = busyness over outcomes, vs embracing a whole new skill set that enables embracing transformative solutions and ways of working.

回复

You have spoken my mind Bertlan ! These catchy phrases are differently used and interpreted by different people/companies. Not only pharma, companies in any industry must define "what exactly they mean by it in terms of leadership, value creation and vision" as you rightly said !!?

Clemens Utschig-Utschig, MBA

Head of IT Technology Strategy / CTO at Boehringer Ingelheim | ex-Oracle

3 年

Bertalan Meskó, MD, PhD 'll try... and yes *digital* transformation may be the wrong term.. we mean to become more usercentric, internally and externally - use new working methods aside the sometimes needed waterfall - look at cutting edge tech all across the value chain .. in short: use iterations..

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bertalan Meskó, MD, PhD的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了