Why Never to “Design and Build” ?

I have been speaking with a lot of people…

Say more than thousands, since the last two decades of practice.

And one discussion crops up quite often; should a client Hire a “Turnkey Guy” to Design and Build or Should he hire a separate Architect and a Separate contractor for the Same Job!

If this is on your mind, read on.

And I am saying this from 22 years of hard core experience, Do NOT Hire Turnkey Guys!

As the saying goes, "don't put all your eggs in one basket," and this holds true for the world of construction as well. It's a common misconception that the architect of a project should also serve as the contractor, but this can lead to a variety of issues.?

I have seen clients come to us after disastrous results of the above Mishap, some difficult to recover. Some may contradict this statement, but I am saying, it pains me to see the end results in most cases of “Turnkey Solutions”

So, What's exactly wrong with that?

Well, Here’s what is:?

A. Conflict of Interest

When the architect of a project is also the contractor, it can create a conflict of interest. The architect may be more focused on maximizing their profits as a contractor rather than designing the best possible building for the client. This can result in design choices that prioritize cost-saving measures over quality and functionality.

B. Limited Perspective

The architect's primary responsibility is to design the building, while the contractor's job is to construct it. By combining these two roles, there is a risk of limiting the architect's perspective. They may be more inclined to design a building that is easier to construct, rather than “pushing the boundaries” of what is possible and creating a “truly innovative and unique building.”

C. Lack of Accountability

When the architect is also the contractor, there is no one to hold them accountable for any mistakes or issues that may arise during construction. This can lead to a lack of transparency and communication, which can ultimately harm the project's outcome.

D. Limited Resource Allocation

As a contractor, the architect may be more focused on their own resources and time, rather than those of the project as a whole. This can result in a limited allocation of resources, which may result in delays or cost overruns.

E. Different Skill Sets

Architects and contractors have different skill sets, and their roles in a project are distinct. Architects focus on design, creativity, and aesthetics, while contractors focus on construction, project management, and problem-solving. Architects are trained to think about the big picture and the overall design, while contractors are trained to focus on the details and ensure that the project is completed on time and within budget. Combining both roles can lead to confusion and chaos.

F. Legal Issues

Architects are not licensed to perform construction work, and contractors are not licensed to perform design work. Combining both roles can lead to legal issues if something goes wrong during the construction process. It can be challenging to assign responsibility for errors or omissions in design or construction if the same person is responsible for both.

G. Cost

Combining the roles of architect and contractor may not be cost-effective. Architects and contractors have different pay scales, and combining both roles may result in higher fees for the client. Additionally, it can be difficult to negotiate with an individual who is responsible for both design and construction work.

H. Lack of Control

Turnkey projects may limit the client's control over the project because the design and construction are handled by a single entity. This can result in a lack of transparency, as the client may not know how the project is progressing or how the budget is being spent. It can also be difficult to hold the turnkey provider accountable if something goes wrong.

Precisely speaking....

Let's really not make the Chemist, our Surgeon, or vice versa.

Have a great Day.

Cheers!