Why Most Crisis Simulations Fail: A 10-Part Reality Check for Preparedness Leaders
AI generated image with MidJourney

Why Most Crisis Simulations Fail: A 10-Part Reality Check for Preparedness Leaders

If you're running crisis simulations the same way you did three years ago, you're training your teams to fight yesterday's battles. The uncomfortable truth? Most crisis simulations are little more than expensive role-playing exercises that create false confidence.

Modern crises don't respect your carefully designed scenarios. They don't follow your expected timelines. And they certainly don't care about your traditional response frameworks.

The next 10 essays will challenge everything you think you know about crisis simulation design:

  • Why realism matters more than comfort
  • How stress calibration changes everything
  • When communication protocols actually fail
  • Where knowledge gaps become critical
  • Why real systems integration is non-negotiable
  • How lessons learned often get lost
  • What evaluation frameworks miss
  • Why human factors trump technical skills
  • How resource planning goes wrong
  • Why large-scale emergency preparation falls short

Each essay provides actionable insights for upgrading your simulation design. Each challenges conventional wisdom. And each is based on hard lessons from real crisis responses.

You can read number 1 below ??

The goal isn't to run perfect simulations. It's to create imperfect scenarios that develop an almost perfect response.

Stop developing simulations that confirm your current plans. Start designing ones that expose their weaknesses.


Essay #1: "Why Your Crisis Simulation Is Too Simple to Be Useful: The Realism Problem"

Crisis simulations often fail before they begin because they're designed to fit neatly into your Tuesday afternoon schedule. But real crises don't arrive in tidy two-hour packages with coffee breaks and discussion periods.

Here's an uncomfortable truth: Your perfectly scripted scenarios are creating dangerous false confidence.

While you're running tabletop exercises with clear decision points, real organizations are facing multi-dimensional chaos that shatters their response assumptions.

Modern crises don't follow linear paths.

A cyber attack disrupts your emergency communications. A power outage takes down your backup systems. Social media amplifies misinformation faster than you can correct it. Your simulation must mirror this cascading complexity.


Real crisis simulations should include:

  • Simultaneous system failures
  • Conflicting information streams
  • Infrastructure breakdowns
  • Stakeholder relationship tensions
  • Resource constraint ripple effects
  • Decision-making under extreme uncertainty

The most effective simulations deliberately create controlled chaos. They force participants to abandon their assumptions about crisis progression. They build confidence not in following plans, but in adapting when plans fail.

If your participants can predict what's coming next, you're not preparing them for reality. They should leave feeling challenged but more capable of handling uncertainty.

Stop designing scenarios that fit nicely into your training schedule. Start designing ones that reflect the messy reality of modern crises.


Interested in risk, crisis and emergency communication?

Follow me here on LinkedIn or subscribe to my weekly newsletter "Wag The Dog" where I cover these topics and look at the potential impact of technology and AI is having.

Join +1000 of your peers who already did and enjoy long form articles on specific topics from strategic crisis communication management to AI driven simulation design.

Mark Shapiro

Manager, Regional Emergency Operations Center @ WHO Europe | Crisis Management | International Development & Capacity Strengthening

3 天前

Totally agree... I have used simulation exercises across different Government and UN organisation to test planning assumptions, system functionality and response approaches. We use exercises to train our teams to make decisions in "uncertainty" and to adapt and adjust responses to meet the unexpected. From my experience, no plan survives contract with reality. Looking forward to reading the essays :-)

Elsa Lemos

Crisis Communication Specialist, I take care of organizations and people to be prepared for the worst of scenarios

1 个月

Crisis exercises should include surprise factors—the idea is to hit the sore spots. I've seen participants during exercises worrying if the situation is real or if it could actually happen, making frantic phone calls and rushing to their computers. That's how I know it was worth it.

Charlotte Taylor Dimond

Director - Sidekick PR, Associate Lecturer - Sheffield Hallam University , Trustee - Grimm & Co, Research student - Leeds Beckett University

1 个月

This is a great read Philippe Borremans. This should be the starting point for all crisis testing 'Stop developing simulations that confirm your current plans. Start designing ones that expose their weaknesses.' Uncertainty plays a huge role in any crisis and teams need to be ready to deal with this.

Rui Martins

Corporate Communication * Public Affairs * Economic Diplomacy * European Affairs * Reputation Management * Social Media Marketing

1 个月

Concordo!

Augusto Scarella

Director en Sciat Facere | Auditoría de Riesgos

1 个月

excelent

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Philippe Borremans的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了