Why medical school may be failing today’s doctors
Little has changed at the nation’s medical schools, but now some clinicians are questioning the makeup of traditional medical school curriculum and even what qualities make for a great doctor. At the same time, the U.S. health care system is undergoing a number of changes that influence how doctors today and in the future will practice medicine.
“We have stuffed all this information into the minds of our young doctors and trainees that is really not exactly what they need to know,” Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital, told me this summer. “What they need to learn are good communication skills, how to deal with uncertainty, how to tell a patient you don't know, how to assess something when there's not a randomized controlled trial, knowing your limits when you call the senior doc in to give you advice, the business of medicine, health care literacy.”
Makary isn’t the only doctor (or expert) who feels this way. They are concerned about how physicians are trained when it comes to leadership training, nutrition and opioids. MD/MBA programs are flourishing. And some medical schools are starting to take into account non-traditional medical skills like empathy and emotional intelligence.
An analysis published last month in The Lancet Planetary Health found that “nutrition is insufficiently incorporated into medical education, regardless of country, setting, or year of medical education.” Also in September, a new report from Harvard University’s Food Law and Policy Clinic urges medical schools to incorporate more nutrition training for doctors. “We have to get beyond the disease care model that we doctors get trained in where the only therapeutic tools taught are drugs and surgery,” Dr. Frank Lipman, a practitioner of functional medicine, told Well + Good.
At Thomas Jefferson University’s Sidney Kimmel Medical School, would-be medical students are scored on their empathy, in addition to their academic prowess. Leaders there believe that doctors with higher empathy scores tend to have better patient outcomes. That's something that also resonates with Dr. Eric Topol, a cardiologist at Scripps Health, artificial intelligence expert, and a regular in #TheCheckup.
“Do we really need the brainiacs, the ones with the highest MCAT scores and the best grade point averages?” he said in an interview earlier this year. “Or or do we really need people who are the ones with the most emotional intelligence?”
Physicians, what’s your take on these ideas? Did medical school adequately prepare you for your career? What skills or knowledge do you wish you would have gained? Share your thoughts in the comments.
News I’m Watching
MARKETS | Is an IPO on tap for One Medical? According to CNBC, the direct primary care startup with its own electronic health record is reportedly preparing to go public next year. In a direct primary care model, patients pay an annual fee to join a medical practice. The reported IPO plans indicate two trends to watch. A number of health technology firms like Health Catalyst and Livongo have gone public this year, and physicians and patients are intrigued by direct primary care, which aims to improve access for patients and allow doctors to spend quality time caring for patients.
Editor’s Pick: “By any measure One Medical is overvalued...A $1.5 billion valuation on the last funding round with 70 clinics: the numbers don't make sense. What's the EBITDA or revenue multiple here that supports this? Seems unlikely in an outpatient retail clinic chain model.” - Dr. Brian Miller, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
MONEY | The price tag for health care waste? $760 billion a year. Up to 25% of U.S. health care spending is wasteful, according to The New York Times reports, citing research from JAMA. Administrative costs are the main culprit, with overpricing, inefficient care and fraud also prominent. Administrative costs include billing and reporting to health insurance companies,. Health care accounts for 18% of the U.S. economy; researchers argue that even marginal savings could reap monumental benefits. [By Lauren Lee and Zach Roston]
Editor’s Pick: “Health care is, by definition, a market failure...That's the elephant in the room. If we don't address prices, the rest quite frankly doesn't much matter. Value-based care has an icicles' chance in hell to bring prices of health care products and services to affordable levels.” - Jan Malek, Cannery Row Advisors
WORKFORCE | No Rx needed in California for HIV prevention drugs. California passed a law that allows pharmacists to dispense HIV prevention medications to patients without a prescription, according to the Los Angeles Times. It is the first state to do so. Gilead Sciences is the only drugmaker so far to market a HIV drug Truvada for pre-exposure prophylaxis and post-exposure prophylaxis. Pharmacists in California can also dispense emergency contraceptives, birth control, naloxone and smoking cessation drugs without a prescription.
Editor’s Pick: “We need more expansion of pharmacist services like this.” - Christelle Biame, pharmacist, Encompass Health
*Comments have been edited.
Physicians, what’s your take on these ideas? Did medical school adequately prepare you for your career? What skills or knowledge do you wish you would have gained? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Teacher at primary schoo/ Pharmasist assistant/ President of football club/ Summer comp animator.
5 年I have been a salesman in the pharmacy and I am now in my application but I feel that this is not enough and I want to expand in the field of pharmacy to have a lot of information as well as I have a great interest in the field of nursing assistance I do not have a certificate but I love this job so I ask you about whether You're in the right places. And thank you.
Remote Medical Scribe & Medical School Applicant
5 年I hope the changes in this article actually translate into action in medical schools. As a non-traditional student without a science degree who is not a strong test taker, I fear my dream of being a doctor will be hindered by a system that puts too much emphasis on textbook smarts and less on life experiences. I am a veteran patient who has seen more doctors than I would like who aren't compassionate, empathetic, and truly want to get to know me before recommending meds or procedures. One of the specialties in which I am a veteran patient is ENT, and I have parted ways with so many of those specialists because some were initially caring and determined to fix my problem with surgery after meds didn't respond, but once my symptoms were not easily diagnosable, they shut me down. I think many specialists, particularly surgeons, are not comfortable with uncertainty because they're trained to literally FIX everything. Unfortunately, not everything can be fixed instantly. Given my life experience and liberal arts education, I am more comfortable with uncertainty - maybe more so than some of those other doctors and my med school applicant peers who have picture perfect test scores and GPAs. I am a long term, big picture thinker, and the questions med schools should be asking themselves is, "will this student's future patients care what the applicants GPA or test scores are?" and the answer should be an confident NO. Even as a former teacher, I accept that not everything can be taught. One CAN teach skills and knowledge, but empathy, compassion, and other soft skills CANNOT be taught. People can easily pick up on who has these skills. I would like to see med school adcoms accept applicants who don't have top scores or GPAs if they have life experience and convince them that they want to be a doctor because they want to make their patient's lives better and serve their fellow humans, not because they want to advance science, make a lot of money, or enter a career that is prestigious despite perfect GPAs and test scores. I want to be a doctor not because of the intellect or prestige required, but because I want to intimately be a part of patient's lives. Also, isn't it interesting that the etymology for the word "doctor" comes from the Latin word, "doctore," to teach? Yet a lot of doctors forget that they are there to educate patients, and along with education comes empowerment. As a patient myself, I don't care at all about where my doctor went to medical school or residency. I care entirely about how the doctor makes me feel and communicates with me. Being a patient is a very vulnerable experience and a doctor with no empathy or compassion only worsens both the quality of care and a patient's opinion of the medical system. I believe that patients thrive and recover when they like and trust their doctor. Just because someone is book smart and attends a prestigious medical school/residency, that doesn't mean they can connect with their patients.?
--
5 年Hello
Medical Doctor, Master in Neurosciences, Master in Public Health
5 年Hay muchos aspectos de la práctica médica actual que no se toman en cuenta, en el currículum y en los contenidos del mismo, por ejemplo: tiempos de duración de una consulta en las instituciones públicas y la forma de aprovechar ese tiempo para obtener información válida, razonar, tomar decisiones con muy bajo o ningún error, que beneficien al paciente y al Médico consultante. Las facultades de ciencias de la salud y las escuelas de medicina, se centran en la simulación y no en la atención real de problemas. No se mide el margen de error y de error sistemático al atender pacientes en los diferentes tipos de consultas y atenciones, para conocer la eficacia de lo actuado y mejorar. Las carreras o programas de Medicina, confunden entre los conceptos y las prácticas de salud, con los de Medicina y sus usos. No se prepara a los estudiantes sobre la evolución de los conceptos actuales y su eficacia, por ejemplo: cómo se logró hacer Dx de neumonía solo con la clínica y sin una Rx de tórax y que tan eficaz es a efectos de tratar un ni?o con neumonía. No se prepara a los estudiantes sobre genómica, ni acerca de los cambios que se darán en el ejercicio de la medicina con la IA, big dará, nanotecnologías, tampoco medicina narrativa.