Why Manual Testing is Still Important?

Undoubtedly, for most of the testers, automation testing is God. For digging out the unwanted and obsolete components and for regression testing, automated QA testing is the best.

Manual testing might be a past story, but today also, it carries much importance. Today, we will let you know the entire story behind that will make you put some shower on the manual testing also.

Why Manual Testing Holds Importance?

Automation testing performs better while the development of automated scripts is carried out for monitoring the operational functionality of a project, and also it is well accepted as a brilliant pick for various projects. However, reveals no presence of the human factor, something can be missed possibly, that can only be detected by a human tester. Even the automated suites with the most sophisticated nature are usually driven by a human presence. However, nothing beats better than manual testing since the first impression from the critical to successful user experience.

The good aspect is that the company is not required to be skilled at QA testing whether it’s manual or automated because of QA outsourcing, that can be reliable, inexpensive and safer.

Why & When To Use Manual Testing

While attempting to build a link with the end users, nothing can take the place of human ability and intelligence. The manual testing is best for smoke testing as it proves to be faster and efficient for a tester to analyze the incurable readiness testing application, as for automation testing it opposes writing the scripts. For monitoring the language usage, important localization aspects, and the other factors, a human tester would be more skilled which would result in a successful app targeting various regions within or across the countries. A tester is required in manual testing to accomplish various tests to pull out defects or errors or bug that can occur possibly. Moreover, every possible scenario would be employed by the testers where the issues may create hurdle in the user’s path.

The beings are going on with a misconception that manual testing is found to be in favour of the stringent deadline and short-term project only. This is not exactly true as manual QA testing profits a project in various ways. It proves to a cost-effective method for testing the small batches. The top software testing companies will let you know that manual testing performs best for UX and UI. In the starting stages of a project, alterations are permanent and this allows manual testing to work in a better way.

About UX Testing 2019

Later on, after appending a new feature or changing the existing one, updating an automated script would be more time consuming as compared to that of UX testing. It too depicts all in a whole that manual testing is more flexible as it permits rapid testing next to each rather than carrying out for the complete process.

When talking with the perspective of human resource, it is easier to train and source manual testers who are proficient at distinguishing possible issues that may not be achieved by automated test scripts.

Additionally, in a similar way an end user interacts with software, manual testers do the same, and therefore are more strong in attaining usability and UI problems. This is not the taste of automated test scripts.

Ad hoc testing is supported by manual testing where it crosses all its boundaries of test preparation and planning and grabs directly the portions that seem to be problematic and fixes them. In the rim of manual testing, the negative and false positive can’t find the way and get uncovered, that sometimes throw the dust into the eyes of automation testing. The bugs can too be the part of the automated test scripts and only the human element can assist in avoiding them easily.

As we have already mentioned that it’s not possible to have everything automated. Some of the features in system or app can be tested best manually since, within the time limit of scripting the automated test, a manual tester would easily clear up the issues successfully. Moreover, it is important to search for the assistance of a renowned QA outsourcing company, that may possess the calibre to guide you in the field of best possible software testing methodologies.

Automation testing software tools are the best saviour as saves time and provide fast outcomes on a big level. Though, to link and engage the end users and make them learn their obstacles conceptually, manual testing is an apt reply.

Wrapping Lines

An essential component, testing in the field of software development and carrying appropriate and necessary tests on the software assures the quality of the product. Both automated and manual testing reveal their advantages and both should participate in our QA testing approaches but in the realm of software testing, the expert can only hold a calibre to handover you the best of them both. Must be conducted with empathy and care, testing is a service that connects with the world for much more.