Why Machines Will Help Humans, Not Replace Them

Why Machines Will Help Humans, Not Replace Them

Originally posted on the Wonolo blog.

We are at the dawn of the age of robots. Everyday, headlines seem to scream at us that the robot apocalypse is upon us, and that these machines will replace human jobs by the millions. But as with any technological advance, the story is more complicated than simple displacement.

Even as Amazon submits a patent for a drone delivery tower and Walmart submits one for a drone-deploying blimp, both of which would eliminate the need for traditional warehouses, it’s hiring more full-time workers than ever before. The latest estimate places the company’s robot fleet at around 45,000, a 50% increase from the previous year. Yet the expansion of its human workforce has also seen a 50% increase to sit at 340,000 total employees at the end of 2016.

Source: Quartz

The common logic is that with increased automation, there would be less of a need for human workers. Amazon’s behavior doesn’t quite comply with that prediction, due to several different factors.

More Automation Means More Supply and Demand

When you look back at history, automation has ironically brought more work for humans because of an increased demand for services or goods. Enabled by the technology, companies were able to produce goods faster and cheaper, increasing consumer demand and creating the need for more supply to meet those demands.

During the Industrial Revolution, the number of employed cloth weavers grew explosively thanks to the machines:

“In America during the 19th century the amount of coarse cloth a single weaver could produce in an hour increased by a factor of 50, and the amount of labour required per yard of cloth fell by 98%. This made cloth cheaper and increased demand for it, which in turn created more jobs for weavers: their numbers quadrupled between 1830 and 1900.” Source:  The Economist

The nature of their jobs shifted, from time spent on actual weaving to operating machinery. This change in the job description is mirrored in another example from the legal industry, where the invention of computers seemed to threaten their livelihood at first.

“But, perhaps surprisingly, electronic discovery software has not thrown paralegals and lawyers into unemployment lines. In fact, employment for paralegals and lawyers has grown robustly. While electronic discovery software has become a billion-dollar business since the late 1990s, jobs for paralegals and legal-support workers actually grew faster than the labor force as a whole, adding over 50,000 jobs since 2000, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The number of lawyers increased by a quarter of a million.” Source:  The Atlantic

Past patterns suggest that when routine tasks become automated, two fundamental changes accompany the technological development:

  1. a) More humans need to be hired in order to counter the increased demand;
  2. b) The nature of the workers’ tasks shifts to focus on something the machines can’t yet do.

In reality, this is already happening at Amazon. When it first announced its ambitious fulfillment center in Houston, it expected to hire 1,000 workers alongside robots. Now, they expect to hire 2,500. Because the robots can get inventory from the aisles at a rapid pace, more workers are needed to keep up with their speed.

Additionally, spokesperson Ashley Robinson anticipates more demand on the customer side as well: “Customer demand is expected to increase … We need to hire more folks to make sure we can keep up.”

As Amazon continues to expand its robot-equipped warehouses, there will be an increased demand for workers who will be spared the heavy lifting, but expected to spend that saved time packing and shipping instead.

Simple Tasks for Robots, Complex Tasks for Humans

While there’s no doubt that robots are actively replacing humans in the simplest and dullest warehouse tasks like heavy lifting, there’s still a way to go before they can perform “complicated” tasks that are still very easy for humans, like picking out items in plastic...

To read more, head over to the Wonolo blog.

Hilmar Karlsson

CIO / Senior manager for Business Processes and IT at Eimskip

7 年

The question to complete the picture is "was the total effect positive?". That is to say did Amazon grow the workplace market as a whole or were more jobs lost at other companies and competitors than Amazon hired? Finally there are a lot of people out there that will simply be unable to perform the more complex tasks.

Jair Barbosa

Tech Lead | Software Engineer | Java | PHP | Python | Nodejs | AI enthusiast

7 年

The problem is not about machine and automated tasks, but about brain substituition (aka. AI), if the creation of "complex" jobs that only human can handle (i think only emotional ones) be less than that which (robots equiped with real AI) robots can, we will have created our path to doom

Natan Rizzo L.

Integrations Lead

7 年

"Simple Tasks for Robots, Complex Tasks for Humans" says it all

Diane DeLongchamp

Happily retired but staying connected--

7 年

I still think many people will be left behind and several already are. That is why there is so much unemployment discontent that many are willing to vote for obnoxious political leaders. What has to happen is a paradigm shift of relying on paid employment as a goal to self-reliance by make living day to day living as cheaply as possible. If automation continues, we might even have to go back to bartering goods and services. Wait! That does exist, Kijij anyone?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了