Why LinkedIn Recommended Messages Are Killing Your Credibility

Why LinkedIn Recommended Messages Are Killing Your Credibility

If you’ve used LinkedIn messages recently, you’re probably well aware of the recommended message boxes that pop up. It's simple. Open up your inbox, and you'll see 1-3 boxes at the bottom of any message thread with canned responses like "Thank you" or "Sure" or "What do you mean?" Tap the box and you can send a message without an ounce of mental effort.

No alt text provided for this image

As it stands, the suggestions have the potential to completely ruin your credibility and remove any meaning from your interactions. A face-to-face conversation is, in other words, human-to-human, and so are digital conversations with your own, unique messages and style. But a conversation using the recommended messages is machine-to-machine, although you're still talking to a human.

At worst, the receiver will feel that you don't care about them, because you couldn't bother with simply writing a meaningful sentence. At best, the receiver will feel that you're very lazy. Only someone who's very optimistic, coupled with you leading a large company, would assume that you're just too busy to write even one sentence.

No alt text provided for this image

I recently exported my LinkedIn data, and it turns out I've sent and received over 24,000 messages. Hundreds, and possibly thousands of those were the recommended, canned "Interesting", "Sure", and "??"-type messages.

Essentially, what those messages are conveying is that the receiver does not warrant any effort whatsoever. You're telling them: You are worth less than the additional 30 seconds it would take for me to write a message tailored to you and your needs.

No matter who you are, that's not the message you want to be conveying.

Alessandro Giuntini

Payment Operation Specialist at SwissBorg | Author of '12 Rules for Life According to ChatGPT'

5 年

That's the point! I'm moving a true crusade against this practice! The picture shows my last "battle"...

回复
Derren de Jong

I help people spend less on video hosting | Managing Director @ kinescope.io | Board of Directors | Non-executive Director | Board Advisor |

5 年

Strongly disagree if we are talking platform neutral. It matters how good the software is in predicting what you actually want to say. Yes, the linkedin canned responses suck. However, I use auto-complete in my emails in almost every email I send. Google is much better at this.

James Parker

Venture Capital/Business Development

5 年

Was just thinking this the other day, also the pre-generated messages are a lot less intuitive and professional than other platforms like Gmail autocomplete where it might be harder to tell if it is a recommended message.? The flaw with LinkedIn is that the recommended messages feel unnatural and prerendered

Joey Bertschler

VolanteChain.com CEO, form. OpenAI and Forbes. 600k+ Web3 YouTube

5 年

LinkedIns auto-fill messages are a tool and often miss-used. Great read!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Frederik Bussler的更多文章

  • The Future of Investing is Democratized

    The Future of Investing is Democratized

    Technology moves astonishingly fast. Just a decade ago, people were amazed that they could have a touch-screen phone in…

    4 条评论
  • 10 Steps To A High ROI Content Strategy

    10 Steps To A High ROI Content Strategy

    Your website is a bridge between Google and your offer. When someone searches keywords in your niche, you want them to…

    45 条评论
  • Would you buy from an AI sales robot?

    Would you buy from an AI sales robot?

    It's clear who's frustrated in sales, and who's using AI to stay ahead of the game. With all the competing attention…

    3 条评论
  • From 0 to AI for Marketing Hero: 3 Easy Use-cases

    From 0 to AI for Marketing Hero: 3 Easy Use-cases

    You've heard that AI is transforming marketing, but you may not know how to separate hype from real value. I'll cover…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了