Why LinkedIn Recommended Messages Are Killing Your Credibility
Frederik Bussler
Partnering with the brightest minds in AI and marketing to deliver world-class solutions
If you’ve used LinkedIn messages recently, you’re probably well aware of the recommended message boxes that pop up. It's simple. Open up your inbox, and you'll see 1-3 boxes at the bottom of any message thread with canned responses like "Thank you" or "Sure" or "What do you mean?" Tap the box and you can send a message without an ounce of mental effort.
As it stands, the suggestions have the potential to completely ruin your credibility and remove any meaning from your interactions. A face-to-face conversation is, in other words, human-to-human, and so are digital conversations with your own, unique messages and style. But a conversation using the recommended messages is machine-to-machine, although you're still talking to a human.
At worst, the receiver will feel that you don't care about them, because you couldn't bother with simply writing a meaningful sentence. At best, the receiver will feel that you're very lazy. Only someone who's very optimistic, coupled with you leading a large company, would assume that you're just too busy to write even one sentence.
I recently exported my LinkedIn data, and it turns out I've sent and received over 24,000 messages. Hundreds, and possibly thousands of those were the recommended, canned "Interesting", "Sure", and "??"-type messages.
Essentially, what those messages are conveying is that the receiver does not warrant any effort whatsoever. You're telling them: You are worth less than the additional 30 seconds it would take for me to write a message tailored to you and your needs.
No matter who you are, that's not the message you want to be conveying.
Payment Operation Specialist at SwissBorg | Author of '12 Rules for Life According to ChatGPT'
5 年That's the point! I'm moving a true crusade against this practice! The picture shows my last "battle"...
I help people spend less on video hosting | Managing Director @ kinescope.io | Board of Directors | Non-executive Director | Board Advisor |
5 年Strongly disagree if we are talking platform neutral. It matters how good the software is in predicting what you actually want to say. Yes, the linkedin canned responses suck. However, I use auto-complete in my emails in almost every email I send. Google is much better at this.
Venture Capital/Business Development
5 年Was just thinking this the other day, also the pre-generated messages are a lot less intuitive and professional than other platforms like Gmail autocomplete where it might be harder to tell if it is a recommended message.? The flaw with LinkedIn is that the recommended messages feel unnatural and prerendered
VolanteChain.com CEO, form. OpenAI and Forbes. 600k+ Web3 YouTube
5 年LinkedIns auto-fill messages are a tool and often miss-used. Great read!