Why Jensen Huang Thinks Kids Shouldn't Learn to Code
Walter Shields
Helping People Learn Data Analysis & Data Science | Best-Selling Author | LinkedIn Learning Instructor
At the recent World Government Summit in Dubai, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made headlines by advising youngsters not to learn how to code. Instead, he believes that with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), programming is no longer a critical skill. In this post, we will look into Huang's reasoning and explore why he thinks AI should take care of coding tasks.
Huang argues that as AI continues to advance, it will become more adept at programming than humans. This means that individuals can focus on developing expertise in other areas
Moreover, Huang believes that learning to code may become obsolete in the future as AI becomes more integrated into our daily lives. With AI-powered tools and platforms handling the bulk of programming tasks, individuals may not need to possess coding skills to thrive in their careers. Instead, they can leverage the capabilities of AI to streamline processes and drive efficiency in their work.
Critics argue that by discouraging children from learning how to code, we risk losing out on valuable problem-solving and analytical skills that come with programming. However, Huang counters this by emphasizing the importance of adapting to technological advancements
领英推荐
While Jensen Huang's stance on kids not learning how to code may seem controversial at first glance, it sheds light on the evolving landscape of technology and its impact on education. As AI continues to reshape industries and redefine job roles
Jensen Huang's perspective on coding offers a fresh take on how we should approach education and career development. While his advice may challenge traditional views on tech literacy, it opens up a dialogue about the role of AI in shaping the future workforce. Ultimately, whether kids should learn how to code or leave it up to AI is a question worth pondering as we navigate through the ever-changing landscape of technology.
Data No Doubt! Check out WSDALearning.ai and start learning Data Analytics and Data Science Today!
Researcher
11 个月It makes sense when kids are given chances to learn to code, there would be chances where the propulsion at the backend is mainly gaming or artistic design. Games are built with AIs while there forms and levels of complexity varies. Art design frees whatever could be invoked in the mindset, boosted with the help of auto-completion even at the graphic level in Adobe AI and Blender. By means of learn to code is to take a stance at the level where machine can generalize better then people. In the light of LLMs we might need to change the way of teaching based on the scale of projects.
Surely, if we don't preserve the ability to code (and to read code) and just devolve that responsibility to an AI, we have lost control of the environment. Code will become opaque and unreadable - even for those that can still understand code - and we will lose the ability to correct it. Errors will proliferate, security will be compromised, and architectures will become unmanageable. I have seen the abominable mess that some AIs produce when asked to write applications. We are nowhere near ready to absolve responsibility for good applications to AIs just yet.