Why Instructional Design Is the Best-Kept Secret in the Design World
Jason Braun M.Ed., MSML, MA
Instructional Designer l Coach | Author of Designing Context-Rich Learning by Extending Reality | Featured in The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Riverfront Times, ESPN.com, and more | Thriving with ADHD and Dyslexia
The power of Instructional design (ID) is hiding in plain sight. It’s rigorous, creative, and deeply interdisciplinary—yet often misunderstood or outright overlooked by designers in fields like graphic design, UX, and industrial design. One reason? Where it’s taught.
Instructional design is nestled within colleges of education, not design schools, which keeps it walled off from the broader design community. This academic divide limits exposure, cross-pollination, and recognition of instructional design as a bona fide design discipline.
The Academic Divide: How Instructional Design Got Stuck
In most U.S. universities, instructional design programs are housed in colleges of education. Historically, this made sense: the field emerged during World War II to develop military training programs rooted in educational theory.
As instructional design has evolved—folding in technology, cognitive science, and human-centered design—it has remained tethered to its educational roots. Meanwhile, design disciplines like graphic design, industrial design, and architecture thrive in art, design, or engineering schools, where students collaborate across specialties and see design as a shared language.
Instructional designers, however, often interact primarily with future educators and administrators. This limits their visibility and influence in professional design spaces, perpetuating the misconception that instructional design is "just for classrooms" instead of a field that shapes how people engage with information and experiences across industries.
Why This Matters
Signs of Change: Breaking Down Silos
The tides are starting to shift. Take the Digital Media Design Graduate Program at Harvard Extension School . Among its core offerings—web development, animation, and media production—you’ll find instructional design alongside traditionally "creative" disciplines. This signals a growing acknowledgment of ID’s relevance beyond education.
By merging pedagogy with technology and creative problem-solving, programs like this pave the way for instructional design to claim its rightful place in the design world. These shifts point toward a future where instructional design isn’t an outlier but a central player in the broader design conversation.
领英推荐
The Numbers Tell the Story
Consider this: there are over 250,000 graphic designers in the U.S. but only about 99,000 instructional designers. This isn’t just a workforce gap—it’s an awareness gap. Graphic design students often encounter UX or industrial design during their studies. But instructional design? Rarely, if ever. This lack of exposure perpetuates the invisibility of a field that’s every bit as dynamic and impactful.
How to Bring Instructional Design Into the Fold
A More Connected Design Ecosystem
Instructional design is overdue for recognition as a core design discipline, alongside UX, industrial, and graphic design. Its practitioners tackle some of the most complex challenges—crafting experiences that transform how people learn, engage, and grow. By breaking down the silos that separate instructional design from other fields, we open the door to richer collaboration and innovation across the design ecosystem.
Let’s stop treating instructional design as a best-kept secret and start recognizing it for what it is: a creative, impactful, and essential design discipline.
#InstructionalDesignIsDesign #UserExperience #GraphicDesign #DesignStrategy
Training & Project Manager | Learning & Development Specialist | Driving Employee Engagement & Optimizing Training Programs
1 周I recently read your article and I'm really excited about your views on instructional design. I completely agree that instructional designers are often underutilized in many organizations. Your insights on how instructional design can intersect with technology, cognitive science, and human-centered design are eye-opening. I'm looking forward to learning more from your perspective!
Writer, Artist, Educator, Programme Leader: MA in Instructional and Learning Design, Assistant Lecturer Critical and Contextual Studies, Assistant Lecturer MA Fine Art, Instructional Designer
2 周Our instructional and learning design postgraduate course is hosted in one of Ireland’s leading and oldest art and design universities (Limerick School of Art and Design). Our students come from graphic design animation fine art and other creative and professional sectors. We recognised exactly your sentiments. And I cannot tell you how much the education sector does NOT know about instructional and learning design. I find myself having to explain it over and over to those in education who often find it hard to grasp.
Learning Experience Designer (LXD) | Custom eLearning and ILT | I help clients shift from humdrum box-checker training to engaging learning experiences that make a measurable impact.
2 周Instructional design became the calling for those of us who refuse to be boxed into one discipline. Where journalism left off, ID stepped in. Having to explain what I do? Small price to pay.
Building Better Workplaces, One Solution at a Time.
3 周Great article!
Sr. Learning Experience Designer | Digital Learning Developer
1 个月ID is essentially about education, but: (1) the word "design" suffers from overuse in the marketplace and ID exists in this; (2) ID lacks worldwide standards that should arise from Learning Sciences (which in my opinion is the discipline that grounds it); anyone who puts together a few ppt slides and calls it training can claim to be doing ID, just as anyone who can prototype a UX app in Figma can - which doesn't make it true, of course...An ID can use a variety of digital tools, but the yardstick by which their success is being evaluated is learning. I believe either ID needs to be able to stand on its own or risk further dilution in the age of genAI, or should be properly called "Learning Engineering" (which embraces an ecosystemic approach), grow along its emerging standards, and professionally distinguish itself from other design related fields... But it shouldn't decouple from education. Because we target learning, especially durable learning, and we draw on our knowledge of human cognition and experimental evidence on how humans learn in a variety of environments when designing courses and programs; to which Education gives grounding - and that's not something other design disciplines are after.