Why I Want Quiet Quitters On My Team
Alexis Haselberger
Helping busy professionals (+ teams) do more and stress less
“Quiet Quitting”. It’s the term you can’t get away from. It’s EVERYWHERE.
And I must confess that the term sounds so gimmicky, so hyperbolic, that it took me a few weeks to actually read beyond the headlines and learn what everyone was talking about.
And what did I learn?
Well, here’s the thing: “quiet quitting” isn’t new. And, in my opinion, it isn’t bad.
And, it’s also not, as I had imagined before doing my research, the idea that you’ll just stop showing up to work and see how long it takes to stop receiving a paycheck.
“Quiet quitting” is, in fact, a negative rebranding of something that’s actually essential to our mental health and successful functioning in the world: boundaries.
Calling it “quiet quitting” is a corporate spin to make you feel bad about doing something that’s actually good for you. (And yes, I know. It was those TikTokers that started calling it this is the first place. But I think they were incepted by corporate!)
“Quiet quitting” appears to be, for most people I can find going on record, the idea that you’ll do your job, and do it well or at least sufficiently. But that you’ll confine that job to working hours.
That you won’t be “always on”. That you’ll disconnect from work on evenings. On weekends. On vacation.
In fact, based on this definition, I must have been “quiet quitting” my entire career! (Yet, somehow I was still promoted at every job I ever held.)
While I’d never call it “quiet quitting”, this is actually what I want for anyone who works with me or for me.
And, it’s what I want for you.
It's a sad state of affairs that so many people feel as though doing their job well is simply not enough.
So, how did we get here?
"Quiet Quitting" is a rejection of a toxic “hustle culture” and those who engage in it are likely to be more fulfilled, more stable employees (and humans) in the long run because they aren't as likely to burn out.
Quiet Quitting is a backlash. For too long we’ve been focused on productivity at the expense of everything else. At the expense of humanity. (And, I know, I know, I write about productivity ALL THE TIME. But my definition of productivity is very different from the status quo: to me, productivity is simply “doing what you intended to do“.)
Another culprit? The pandemic.
Over the course of the last few years, as we all started working at home, I've seen boundaries completely obliterated for the vast majority of my clients. Work now seeps into every area of life. Employees feel like they have to be "always on". The dings and pings hunt you down, even as you sleep.
And it's not healthy, nor sustainable.
领英推荐
In fact, studies show that taking breaks from work actually increases productivity and creativity.
This always-working cultural expectation is actually counterproductive.
Let me repeat: quiet quitting isn't about not doing your job, and it's not about not doing your job well. It's about doing your job well AND having a life outside of work.
Yes, there are some people out there saying that “quiet-quitting” is doing the “bare minimum”. And if you’re doing the bare minimum, you may very well be losing status and not on a growth trajectory (and maybe that’s A-OK with you; I’m certainly not judging).
But that’s not what most people are talking about here.
AND, I’m going to argue that if you’ve been regularly working 10, 12, 14 hour days, if you’re constantly tied to Slack and email, if you’re working at all hours of the day and night (and not because you want to, but because you feel you have to), then your definition of “bare minimum” might be my definition of “great job”.
The pendulum has swung too far; so far that we no longer know what middle ground looks like.
So, how do we move forward?
For everyone:
For you:
And if you’re a manager worried about this “quiet quitting” phenomenon?:
And now I’ll end my rant on “quiet quitting”. But don't even get me started on “quiet quitting’s” cousin: “Quiet Firing”. This one is a gentle rebrand of an insidious practice: bad, lazy, cowardly management with a side of gaslighting
Do you think you might be a “quiet quitter”? Then I’ve got a question for you:
Do you want to work to live? Or live to work?
Want tips like this directly in your inbox? https://www.alexishaselberger.com/subscribe
Interested in learning more productivity coaching for you or workshops for your team? https://www.alexishaselberger.com/work-with-me
Executive Assistant/ Administrative Manager
2 年100% agree - I know quite a few quiet quitters who are just burnt out from working so hard to prove themselves on the daily. I saw a lot of people overwork themselves during the pandemic to “prove” they were doing their job. The companies that treat their employees like adults who can successfully self-regulate, not children who need to be present in a seat in an office, are the companies that will retain their top performers. I’m grateful for the previous experiences I’ve had with leaders who do trust me because they’ve allowed me to balance my health and wellness as well as my duties. #thespeedoftrust
100% agree!
Scrum Master. Mijn woorden zijn van mij, die gebruik ik op privé titel.
2 年Yes. For most old fashioned companies clocking more and more hours is a status symbol. It shows commitment and loyalty, the so called leaders think. Therefore setting boundaries is a very healthy thing. The pandemic also showed us, that if we work from home and are allowed to set our own hours and breaks ofcourse, it’s more healthy and productive at the same time. Counting hours present is a very old unhealthy measure. We are only productive 3-5 hours a day. Focus on outcomes therefore. For many of us, most of these hours are also filled to the brim with meetings. Mostly useless. Put responsibility and decision power with the people. Result less meetings, up to 2 days extra time for an fte. Another result of this autonomy, more focus, more flow, healthier and more productive people. We are still working under rules and assumptions of the Industrial Age. It’s a puzzle for me why many CxO or manager still think these rules apply, when work has evolved to the 21th century. #Agilemindset #holocracy
Executive Public Speaking Coach
2 年Well said, Alexis Haselberger!