Why I Don't Use the Term "Neurospicy" as a Neurodiversity Professional

Bridgette Hamstead

As a neurodiversity advocate and professional, I’ve witnessed the language surrounding neurodivergent experiences evolve rapidly. One term that has recently gained popularity, particularly in online communities, is “neurospicy.” While some neurodivergent individuals use this playful label to describe themselves, I believe “neurospicy” is not appropriate for professional, academic, or even broader advocacy contexts. The use of this term raises concerns around euphemistic language, inclusivity, and potential racial implications, which can make it harmful or alienating in certain settings.

A Brief History of the Term "Neurospicy"

"Neurospicy" emerged in online spaces like TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter, where neurodivergent people often share their experiences with humor and pride. The term blends “neurodivergent” with “spicy,” suggesting that the brain's differences are “flavorful” or distinctive. For some, it offers a fun and accessible way to describe their neurodivergent identity. However, as with many euphemisms, this lighthearted approach can oversimplify or misrepresent the complex reality of being neurodivergent, particularly in more serious or professional contexts.

The Harm in Euphemisms: A Historical Perspective

Historically, euphemistic language has been used to describe disability and neurodivergence in an attempt to make these identities more socially acceptable. Terms like "differently-abled" or "special" have often been employed to soften the impact of words like "disabled," under the assumption that these terms make people more comfortable. However, euphemisms can be harmful because they downplay the actual experiences of those they aim to describe. Instead of confronting disability or neurodivergence directly, euphemisms tend to obscure these identities, reinforcing the idea that they are something to be tiptoed around rather than fully understood and accepted.

"Neurospicy" fits into this same pattern. While it may sound fun, it is ultimately a euphemism that dilutes the reality of living with neurodivergence. Many neurodivergent individuals face significant challenges, such as struggles with accessibility, mental health, or navigating an often ableist world. By using a term that focuses on making neurodivergence sound quirky or "flavorful," we risk trivializing these serious aspects and ignoring the need for concrete advocacy and systemic change.

Euphemisms, Professionalism, and Inclusivity

In professional and academic settings, precision and respect in language are crucial. When discussing neurodivergence in these spaces—whether in advocating for policy, designing inclusive environments, or educating others—we need language that accurately reflects the diverse experiences of neurodivergent individuals. "Neurospicy" fails to capture this diversity and falls short of addressing the gravity of the issues many people face.

Additionally, not all neurodivergent individuals identify with or feel comfortable using the term “neurospicy.” While some may enjoy its playful tone, others find it infantilizing or reductive, turning their identity into a buzzword. By using this term in professional contexts, we may inadvertently exclude those who don’t resonate with its casual nature. As advocates, it’s our responsibility to honor the full spectrum of neurodivergent experiences, and that means using language that is respectful, serious, and inclusive.

Cultural Concerns: Why "Spicy" Can Be Problematic

Another concern is the potential racial implications of the word “spicy.” Historically, “spicy” has often been used to stereotype certain cultures, particularly Latin American, African, and Asian communities, as exotic or fiery. Referring to someone as “spicy” can evoke these harmful, racialized stereotypes, reducing rich cultural identities to simplistic caricatures. When this term is applied to neurodivergence, it risks invoking similar stereotypes, particularly for neurodivergent people of color who may already face compounded marginalization.

While those who use “neurospicy” may not intend it to have racial overtones, language doesn’t exist in isolation from its broader social context. For neurodivergent individuals of color, the term can feel doubly alienating—first by diminishing their neurological differences and second by invoking language historically used to diminish or stereotype their cultural backgrounds.

Not All Neurodivergent People Identify with This Term

Crucially, it’s important to acknowledge that not all neurodivergent people resonate with or are comfortable using the term “neurospicy.” Neurodivergence includes a wide range of conditions, including ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and dyspraxia, to name a few. Each person’s experience is different, and the use of a lighthearted, blanket term like “neurospicy” may exclude those who do not feel their experience is reflected by such a playful or quirky label.

Many individuals in the neurodivergent community have fought hard for recognition, accommodations, and support. For some, a term like “neurospicy” can feel dismissive, downplaying the struggles they’ve faced or the seriousness of their conditions. It can also reduce their identity to a trendy label, which is particularly harmful when neurodivergence already comes with stigma, misunderstanding, and marginalization.

The Importance of Respectful Language: A Balanced Perspective

While I strongly believe that "neurospicy" is problematic in professional, academic, and advocacy contexts, I also respect the right of individuals to choose how they identify and the language they use to describe themselves. Self-identification is a deeply personal choice, and I understand that some may find empowerment or community in using this term. However, I would never personally use it, and I would caution others who may not have considered the full implications of using "neurospicy" in broader contexts. My goal is not to police people’s language but to bring awareness to the problematic nature of this term and encourage more thoughtful and inclusive dialogue.

A Call for Thoughtful Language

As neurodiversity professionals, we have a responsibility to use language that uplifts and accurately represents the individuals we advocate for. While terms like "neurospicy" may feel fun or relatable for some, they do not capture the full range of neurodivergent experiences and can unintentionally cause harm. By avoiding euphemisms and using clear, respectful language, we create space for more authentic, inclusive conversations about neurodivergence. In doing so, we can ensure that all neurodivergent people—regardless of how they identify—feel seen, heard, and valued in the communities we seek to support.