Why Human Development Index is the New GDP? Why is India ranked so low in the Human Development Index (HDI)?
GDP is an imperfect economic metric. Is the Human Development Index a viable option?
I believe the answer is yes because the key metric indicators for these two economic measurements are completely different. GDP measures the total value of goods and services in a country over time, whereas HDI measures the quality of life in a country over time. GDP will eventually become obsolete as renowned economists despise its irregularities.
Development of GDP as a measure
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the most common method of measuring an economy; it is the total value of all final goods and services produced in a country over a given time period. GDP can be measured per capita, which measures total output per person, or as a percentage of national output over time.
However, critics of GDP measurement argue that it is an outdated method of analysis. Between the World Wars, economists wanted to assess the economic damage of the Great Depression and compare production capacities across nations. However, GDP only measures a country's productive capacity, not its overall well-being.
Over time, economists recognized the shortcomings of GDP and sought to develop a system of analysis that provides a more accurate picture of an economy's health. Economists with the United Nations Development Program wished to develop a statistic that would shift the focus of development economics away from national income accounting and towards people-centered policies. These economists believed that people and their capabilities, rather than economic growth alone, should be the ultimate criterion for assessing a country's development.
As a result, they developed the human development index, a summary metric that incorporates three key dimensions of human development: health, education, and living standards. Life expectancy at birth, which is calculated into the life expectancy index, determines health. The education index is calculated using the mean years of schooling and the expected years of schooling. And the GNP index, which is based on Gross National Income per capita, determines living standards. The Human Development Index is calculated by combining these three indexes.
Why HDI is more superior to GDP?
The HDI places a greater emphasis on human development than the GDP. It considers a country's quality of life as well as its production capacity. A country's education and health are regarded as equally important as its economic power. GDP is viewed as a means to an end, not an end in itself. GNP per capita, which is essentially the purchasing power of the average person, is an important factor in calculating the Human Development Index, but it is only one of several.
The Human Development Index, as opposed to GDP, provides a more comprehensive picture of a country. Countries with similar GDPs, for example, can have vastly different HDIs. If two countries have similar GDPs but different HDIs, it can help policymakers identify fundamental issues that need to be addressed in their respective countries, such as education or health. Finally, it depicts changes in living standards more accurately over time.
As an extreme example, if every employee in a country's tobacco and weapons industries suddenly became academics or joined the health industry to treat people, find cures, develop vaccines, and so on, GDP might not improve significantly. However, the Human Development Index would change significantly to reflect the country's evolution.
The HDI framework comprises three indices:
Simple conclusion: -
As I previously commented, GDP was created as a statistic to allow economists to attempt to quantify the extent to which the Great Depression harmed economic production and to allow countries to estimate their relative power to one another. GDP was never intended to account for technological progress or the standard of living in times of peace.
Economists agree that the GDP calculation is far from perfect, but there are few better options. In addition to GDP, the Human Development Index takes into account health and education.
What’s the reality of India in HDI (India Vs China)?
According to the Human Development Report 2021-22, India ranks 132nd out of 191 countries. We are still a poor country with the fancy label "Developing Nation."
China's HDI rank is 79, indicating that it is a rising Dragon on the Asian Continent. We cannot compare China's growth to India's because China is at least 50 years ahead of India in every way.
领英推荐
List of Indian states and union territories by Human Development Index
Let's look at the Human Development Index (HDI) rating of the states and union territories of India. HDI is a composite index that takes into consideration health, education, and income.
The following values are estimates from 2021 calculated by Global Data Lab, using the same method of calculation as UNDP. It is important to note that other sources report different HDI rankings (typically higher).
High Human Development: -
1 Kerala 0.752
2 Goa 0.751
3 Chandigarh 0.744
4 Delhi 0.730
5 Puducherry 0.739
6 Lakshadweep 0.715
7 Himachal Pradesh 0.703
8 Sikkim 0.702
My Conclusion:
There are many media narratives about how India is growing, sometimes shining, sometimes a trillion-dollar economy. We're also told that India's GDP has now surpassed the 3.5 trillion-dollar mark, that India is the fastest-growing G20 economy, and a variety of other statistics, but the reality is far more concerning and depressing.
The human development index, in my opinion, is a better indicator that truly tells you about the state of the country. India is ranked 132nd out of 191. This is India at the age of 75.
This Development Narrative has come at a lower environmental cost. To ensure that no one is left behind, India's growth story reflects the country's investments in inclusive growth, social protection, gender-responsive policies, and a push towards renewables.
According to reports, India has the most billionaires, with the number increasing from 102 to 166 between 2020 and 2022. However, there is another figure that increased from 2020 to 2022: the number of hungry people in the country, or those who do not have enough food. Despite being the world's second largest producer of food, India has the highest number of malnourished people.
As a result, I believe India's greatest challenge is population control, as well as educational and cultural reforms.
References:
Research Associate | Qualitative & Quantitative Research in Social Sciences
1 年A fresh perspective ??
IIM Kashipur MBA'26 || Executive Member - Media and Public Relations Committee || Admission Coordinator - Team Insite || University of Kerala - 2nd Rank BBA (2020-23) || NISM Certified Research Analyst
1 年Very well explained!! ??