Why having a non-possessiveness is good for a researcher?

Science, Research, Development and Innovation or simply put together a process of discovery is all about working with dedication and passion. Not to attribute to all, but in a few cases, I have observed that passion turns into possessiveness.

Often times the concerned innovator is unaware about this transition of passion into possessiveness, as there is a very thin line between passion and possessiveness.

Passion is defined as the intense enthusiasm and excitement for what you do, wherein possessiveness is an extreme kind of sense of ownership or belongingness.

When a researcher slips down the path of possessiveness which soon may turn into "me or I" syndrome, it hampers his/her creativity and thoughtfulness, which is essential for being an innovator.

Below, I share some of the compelling reasons for the scientific fraternity to ponder upon the facts as to why one must stay away from being possessive.

• Open Science, Collaboration, Teamwork and Knowledge Sharing: Today's scientific journey requires both collaboration and teamwork. When one drops the possessiveness, you open up to a collaborative environment, where you are willing to share ideas, data, methodologies, scientific findings, and resources with others. This promotes transparency, facilitates replication and validation of research, knowledge exchange, stimulates creativity, accelerates the pace of scientific discovery, and leads to more impactful research outcomes.
• Building on Previous Work and Advancing Science and Innovation: Science is a cumulative process, with new discoveries building upon the work of previous researchers. Scientists who are selfless and non-possessive acknowledge and respect the contributions of others. They are more willing to build upon existing research, collaborate with other scientists, and cite and acknowledge the work of their peers, thereby fostering an environment of intellectual integrity and cooperation. By embracing a collaborative and open approach, together scientists can explore new avenues of research, and make breakthroughs that would be otherwise challenging to achieve individually. Dropping possessiveness encourages inter-, multi-, and trans-disciplinary collaborations and foster a culture of innovation.
• Validation and Reproducibility: Possessiveness can hinder the validation and reproducibility of scientific research. By being open and willing to share ones' work, scientists enable others to independently verify and replicate their findings, strengthening the credibility and reliability of the scientific knowledge base.
• Intellectual Integrity: Possessiveness can sometimes lead to a biased or limited perspective. By being passionate yet non-possessive, scientists open themselves up to new ideas, perspectives and critiques. They can engage in constructive discussions, learn from others, and refine their own research based on valuable feedback, ultimately enhancing the intellectual integrity of their work.
• Ethical Conduct: Possessiveness is in direct conflict and contradiction with ethical conduct. Researchers have a responsibility to uphold scientific integrity, which includes giving credit where it is due, acknowledging the contributions of others, and avoiding plagiarism or intellectual property violations. Being non-possessive helps maintain ethical standards and promotes fair and equitable practices in research and development.
• Promoting a Positive Research and Community Support Culture : Possessiveness creates a sense of isolation and hinder the development of a supportive scientific community. A non-possessive approach contributes to a positive research culture where scientists support and uplift one another. It creates an environment where ideas are freely shared, constructive criticism is welcomed, and mentorship and collaboration valued. This fosters a nurturing and inclusive atmosphere, which can enhance the overall productivity and well-being of the scientific community and its inclusive scientific environment.
• Social Impact: Science is ultimately aimed at benefiting society. Scientists who are non-possessive are more likely to prioritise the greater good over personal interests. They are driven by a genuine desire to contribute to solving societal challenges, advancing knowledge, and improving the well-being of individuals, communities,?nations and the planet as a whole.

In conclusion,

opening up to the 'science of greatness' begins with dropping of the shackles of possessiveness, as greatness requires gratefulness.

Gratefulness inculcates the sense of responsibility and accountability. Let us work towards the scientific temperament that is non-possessive in nature, and inculcate the sense of non-possessiveness, because that is what is needed for a science of impact and influence for all.

Vishwas