Why FMEA ≠ ISO 14971

Why FMEA ≠ ISO 14971

The anwser can be short, ISO 14971 is a risk mangement process, FMEA is a tool.

But it goes further, ISO 14971 requires studying risks under NORMAL and fault conditions.

These two conditions cannot be met by using the FMEA tool alone.

ISO 14971 hazards & hazardous situation approach

Go back to the risk fundamental concept:

Fundamental risk concept of ISO 14971 (Annex C)

From the intended purpose of the medical device, the risk analysis process consists of the following steps:

  1. Description of the intended use of the medical device and reasonably foreseeable misuse;
  2. Identification of the characteristics of the medical device that are related to safety;
  3. Identification of hazards and hazardous situations associated with the medical device;
  4. Estimation of risks for each hazardous situation.

To identify hazards and hazardous situations, the manufacturer may use the following methods (non-exhaustive list):

  • Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA)
  • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
  • Event Tree Analysis (ETA)
  • Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
  • Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)
  • Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP)

??Whatever tool you use, you must describe it in your risk management plan and its contribution must be clearly identified in your hazard traceability matrix.


FMEA could be part of your risk management process (like other tool), but it doesn't meet the standard's requirements on its own.

FMEA (bottom-up) focuses on identifying and analyzing specific failure modes and their effects on a system or process.

Here's a simplified approach:

Bottom-up approcah of FMEA

Due to this techniques, FMEA is NOT intended to replace ISO 14971, but to contribute to ISO 14971:

FMEA contribution to risk management process

Using this technique in your risk analysis process has 4 benefits:

  • FMEA checks each element for Failure Modes and their effects. This boosts product reliability and quality. It spots and fixes Failure Modes early, cutting development costs by avoiding late changes.
  • FMEA uncovers missing or wrong requirements. It can show high criticality ratings, leading to needed design changes.
  • FMEA finds Hazards and event sequences that lead to them. It helps estimate System risk using occurrence ratings of Failure Modes.
  • Start FMEAs early with concept and block diagrams. Update and repeat as design details emerge. This method spots and fixes design flaws early and assesses new changes for safety after release.


As a reminder, the ISO 14971 process must:

  • Start with hazards deduced from intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse
  • Identify hazardous situations arising from the sequence of events
  • (P) and (O) must be indexed to harm
  • Risk is the combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm.

All the elements you need to have an ISO 14971 compliant process are included in our Risk Management Bundle.











Theresa Markey, MSc., M.B.A.

Senior Director, Head of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety @ Savara Inc. | MBA

4 个月

Thank you for reaching out. Great presentation of MDR processes.

Anusch Hekmat, PhD

Interim Manager/Senior Consultant | Dr. Hekmat Consulting | Effective Strategic & Operative expertise | Medical Devices incl. Class III | Regulatory Affairs & Quality Management, AI | sustainable return on investment

4 个月

Good point!

FMEA is one of several tools including: 1. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA): This is a top-down, deductive failure analysis in which an undesired state of a system is analyzed using Boolean logic to combine a series of lower-level events. This method is particularly useful for identifying root causes of complex issues. 2. Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP): Originally developed for food safety, this method identifies potential hazards and implements control measures at critical points during the production process. 3. Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP): This is a structured and systematic examination of a complex planned or existing process or operation in order to identify and evaluate problems that may represent risks to personnel or equipment. 4. Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA): An early stage risk assessment tool that helps to identify hazards and assess risk levels, often used in the initial phases of a project. 5. Risk Ranking and Filtering: A method to prioritize risks based on their severity and likelihood, which helps in focusing on the most critical risks. 6. FRACAS: A system that documents failures and the actions taken to understand the failures and prevent them from recurring.

Stephen Jeong

Empowering Global MedTech with Regulatory and Quality Solutions

4 个月

That's the important

Vincenza Ricciardi

Regulatory Affairs settore biomedicale

4 个月

Agree with your answer. On my opinion ISO 14971 is one of the most instructive standard available to better address the applicability of management of risk assisting actors with info, scheme and examples in their role . FMEA as well is a good method of analysis to determine an impact of a potential failure of product and evaluate the risks . Anyhow both provide a good service to prevent or avoid, if the case, risks. I hope I am not wrong .

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了