Why Every Real Estate Deal Needs an Investment Memo
Arie van Gemeren, CFA
Principal @ Lombard Equities | Ex-Goldman Sachs | Providing access for ultra-wealthy families to invest in multifamily | Chairman of the Housing Committee, Catholic Charities | Amazon Best Selling Author
Let’s talk about one of the most critical - and overlooked - topics in investing: managing emotions and incentives. As deal makers, the pressure to close is immense. Time, money, reputation, and investor expectations can all cloud our judgment and push us into deals that don’t make sense.
Let me lay this out in an orderly format - all the ways in which pressure heaps upon the shoulders of deal people.
Actually, this article should be about all the massive incentive issues that sponsors deal with each and every day of their lives. I'll save that for later, though.
Right now - let's talk about "managing" these emotions. Or shall we call them these "incentive" problems.
First - I think highlighting the incentive issues is a VERY important first step. To solve a problem, we must first acknowledge that there is one. And there's a huge problem of incentives in this business. But just acknowledging them does not make them go away.
The best solution, in my opinion, is to have somebody who doesn't have these incentive problems review your deals. The issue here is that even with this in place, you can still choose to go forward. You can fool yourself into believing you found "the" deal and it just has to be done.
You can likely - if you have a good relationship with your mentor or advisor - also convince them that it's still a good deal.
Thus ...
领英推荐
ENTER THE INVESTMENT MEMO.
Yes - the humble investment memo.
Short of a truly institutional organization with a voting committee on deals, smaller sponsorship groups absolutely need to be writing and preparing investment memos. Better yet, they should write them, prepare them, then share them with their mentors or advisors or anybody affiliated with their company. I think it's a good practice to also share it with the LPs.
The Memo needs to challenge your dearly held assumptions. And you should fill it out on every deal before you advance to GO (GO being releasing DD Funds and going for it full force - because once you've gone hard on a deal, I think it's asking way too much of most sponsors to sacrifice their earnest money to back out).
The reality is that a lot of deals just don't stand up to this level of scrutiny. Now - it's totally possible that a deal has some negatives. honesty - they all do. But on balance, does it win out?
You can still fool yourself through this process, but I find it to be an intellectually rigorous way to manage incentive problems.
Transparency is crucial - people should know your thought process beyond the pitch deck. Have you thought through the really gnarly issues? Are you still convinced it's a good place to put yours and your investors capital?
When is the right time to prepare this?
I think it's way too much to prepare this every time you go into contract on a deal. But I think the Memo should be completed during the due diligence phase, before you release your earnest money deposits.
DM me for a sample investment memo template we use for our deals, or just respond to this article by saying "Memo" and I'll send one over. It’s designed to challenge assumptions, ensure transparency, and help us make better decisions under pressure. It might just save you from your next bad investment.
CFO | Controller for Real Estate Investors and Property Management | An Author | I have over 25 years of experience in bookkeeping and accounting for all businesses nationwide—Advanced QuickBooks Certified ProAdvisor.
1 个月Having clear investment criteria from the start makes it easier to avoid getting caught up in the pressure and walk away from deals that aren’t right.
Portfolio Manager ║ Strategist ║ Relationship Manager ║ Leader
1 个月Memo
Managing Partner at Brand Partners | A Commercial Real Estate and Investment Firm
1 个月Excellent suggestion, it’s a great way to work through confirmation bias and sunk cost fallacy.