Why don’t you sue “Azusa Johnson,” commonly known as AJ?

For those interested in the case involving Azusa Johnson, here is an account of my experience. In September and October 2024, I resided at an Airbnb in Woodbridge, VA, hosted by Azusa Johnson. During this period, Ms. Johnson accused me of "Sexual Battery," which the Prince William County magistrate interpreted as "Unwanted Touch." As a result, two arrest warrants were issued against me, leading to the revocation of my Global Entry status in the USA.

First and foremost, it's essential to gain a better understanding of the situation to fully satisfy your curiosity. It is widely acknowledged among immigrant women, particularly those of Hispanic descent, that America provides significant protection for women, which is largely true. Most women are eligible for benefits such as Section 8 housing, Food Stamps, welfare, Medicaid, and other forms of assistance, as well as job preferences under affirmative action policies, which are often not available to men.

Moreover, some states have laws that criminalize men for touching a woman's body without consent. This perception has led some women to manipulate the system, viewing it as a game. They believe the entire legal framework is a joke.

In the state of Virginia, sexual battery is classified as a Class A misdemeanor. This offense is punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of up to $2,500. Sexual battery is defined as "unwanted touch," meaning that it involves any physical contact that is not consented to by the other person.

As a result, accusations of sexual battery can have significant implications for individuals involved, highlighting the danger of natural law and social fabric, and the legal definitions surrounding this type of offense are mostly confusing and a violation of natural law.

As a result, allegations of “unwanted touch” can significantly affect the lives of those men involved, highlighting the complexities and potential challenges within the social system. The definitions and interpretations of such offenses often appear shamelessly confusing and embarrassing and can sometimes seem to contradict the natural principles of human life and social norms.

Azusa Johnson is characterized by her pathological lying and suspected bipolar disorder. She migrated to the USA from Japan and believes she obtained U.S. citizenship without having a green card. She claims a 3-star general attended her wedding. Despite her strong admiration for America, her house is filled with Japanese photos.

She believes she can act with impunity towards men because she thinks the State of Virginia prioritizes protecting women’s vaginas based on their feelings. According to the legal definition of "unwanted touch," she perceives her actions as justified. Additionally, a visit to the "Prince William County Police Station" revealed posters depicting bruised women and encouraging women to report against men.

In my experience, I realized that my attempt to be kind to her, particularly after witnessing her emotional distress, might have been misguided. My gestures of kindness led her to believe that we were in a romantic relationship. I made an effort to integrate her by providing Halal food, thinking it would help foster a friendly relationship. However, I observed that she seemed to have an obsession with another man, whom she described as a friend of her ex-husband, and noted that he had lived with her for two years.

Anyway, she testified in front of a judge with her imaginary tale. I didn’t care too much about this hearing because, in my mind, I wanted to bring down “Prince William County.” ?The USA has a complex legal system, and I believed my case would be thrown out by the District Court, forcing “Prince William County” to pay a punitive fine of millions.

The key issue here is that she approached a magistrate who issued two arrest warrants based solely on her claims. It's important to question the grounds on which these warrants were issued, especially since I was in her house at the time. This situation clearly demonstrates prejudice.

The culture of the USA fosters a pervasive sense of vigilance and surveillance among its citizens. The hallmark of this mindset is encapsulated in the slogan, “If You See Something, Say Something.” This phrase is emblazoned on signs that adorn almost every town and neighborhood, serving as a constant reminder to report any suspicious activity. This environment encourages individuals to be watchful and to report anything that seems out of place, reinforcing a culture of mutual monitoring and reporting.

In the USA, reporting suspicious activities is a social norm, and this environment fosters a pervasive sense of vigilance. Consequently, people tend to have less trust and confidence in each other.

Azusa Johnson acted under the influence of those who conditioned her to approach the magistrate, lacking the courage to do so on her own. It’s clear that someone orchestrated this situation to manipulate her into making accusations against me, and it wouldn't be surprising if the magistrate were swayed by bribery.

Bottom-line, the judge was wise, experienced, and possessed the intellectual capacity to fully grasp the gravity of the circumstances. In my observation, he navigated the situation with intention, seeking an exit instead of merely following the flow. Without a doubt, he drove skillfully and had a keen awareness of who I was. He wasn't just another robotic judge sticking to the letter of the law; he was exceptionally clever. He engaged in an intellectual mind game to take that exit. But he chose to hurt me in a professional context and embarrassed me in front of everyone. That does not constitute grounds for a lawsuit.