Why Does Your Team Keeps Missing Sprint Goals?

In a recent LinkedIn poll, I posed a critical question to the Agile community: "Imagine a team that has missed their sprint goals for 5-7 consecutive sprints. From the management perspective, which action would be most effective to address this issue?" The responses were enlightening, with a notable majority suggesting that the team should be allowed to figure it out on their own. However, a deeper analysis reveals that this straightforward agilish answer may not be the best.

Poll Results

1. Allow the team to figure out - 61%
2. Manager to find the root cause - 28%
3. Assess individual performance - 7%
4. Disassemble the team - 5%

Key Insights and Analysis

While the majority believe in empowering the team to self-solve, this perspective alone might not fully address the underlying issues. I tried to summarize the insights of the peers and align them with both: Agile principles and Project Management practices.

Agile Principles at Play

Self-Organization and Empowerment

Allowing the team to figure things out promotes self-organization, a cornerstone of Agile. However, this approach assumes the team has the necessary tools and support to identify and resolve issues. Persistent failures might suggest deeper problems that self-organization alone might not resolve.

Inspection and Adaptation

Regular retrospectives and sprint reviews are designed for continuous improvement. If a team repeatedly misses sprint goals, it’s worth scrutinizing these ceremonies. Factors like technical complexities, inadequate feedback, or ineffective capacity planning might be at play. Ensuring that these practices are conducted effectively is crucial.

Beyond Agile: How Managers Can Help

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Management could support the team in conducting thorough RCA. This process should include team members to ensure buy-in and comprehensive insight. Leadership support, rather than top-down intervention, is vital. Managers might facilitate RCA sessions, helping the team identify and address systemic issues.

Scrum Master and Product Owner Accountability

The roles of the Scrum Master and Product Owner are pivotal. These roles might be examined to ensure they are facilitating the team’s success. Are the sprint goals realistic and well-defined? Is the Scrum Master effectively coaching the team and removing impediments? Ensuring these roles are performed effectively can prevent recurring issues.

Transparency and Communication

Open communication and transparency are vital. Issues like over-commitment, incorrect point sizing, and external pressures need to be addressed openly. Management should ensure a culture where team members feel safe to voice concerns and suggest improvements.

Capacity Planning and Realistic Goal Setting

Persistent failure to meet sprint goals often stems from unrealistic planning. Ensuring that capacity planning accounts for all activities (e.g., mandatory training, compliance tasks) and that sprint goals are achievable is essential. Management might work with the team to adjust planning processes as needed.

Integrating Core Project Management Practices

Prioritizing Stewardship

Acting as a steward for the team by providing guidance and resources without micromanaging might be beneficial. Ensuring the team understands their responsibilities and has the support needed to fulfill them is crucial.

Improving Team Dynamics

Fostering a collaborative environment where team members are empowered to take ownership of their work could help. Supporting the development of team capabilities and ensuring roles are clearly defined might improve performance.

Engaging Stakeholders

Engaging with stakeholders regularly to ensure alignment and transparency is important. Addressing any feedback promptly and adjusting plans based on stakeholder input can maintain trust and collaboration.

Maintain Value Focus

Focusing on delivering value incrementally is key. Ensuring that each sprint goal aligns with the overall project objectives and provides tangible benefits to the stakeholders might be more effective.

Using Systems Thinking

Adopting a holistic view of the project and considering how different components interact could be beneficial. Understanding the broader context in which the team operates and addressing any external factors that may impact performance might lead to better outcomes.

Foster a Supportive Environment

While self-organization is key, teams need support to thrive. Facilitating RCA and retrospectives that drive genuine improvement and encouraging open dialogue and transparency might be essential.

Assess and Enhance Roles

Ensuring Scrum Masters and Product Owners are effectively fulfilling their roles is important. Providing additional training if needed and ensuring they have the necessary authority to make impactful changes might help.

Holistic View of Performance

Considering all factors affecting team performance, including those outside Agile practices, could be beneficial. Adjusting sprint cadences, reviewing point sizing practices, and ensuring realistic goal setting might be necessary.

Leadership Involvement

Managers should support, not dictate. Participating in retrospectives, understanding team dynamics, and providing the necessary resources and training to address identified issues might be helpful.

So, What's the Silver Bullet?

Persistent sprint failures require a balanced approach that empowers teams while providing necessary support and intervention. Agile leaders must ensure that self-organization is coupled with effective retrospectives, transparent communication, and realistic planning. By addressing both Agile practices and external factors, and integrating core project management principles, we can create an environment where teams can succeed and continuously improve.

#agile #scrum #sprint #sprintgoal #performance #agility #projectmanagement