Why Does The Indian Market Continue To Disappoint?
Sramana Mitra
Founder and CEO of One Million by the One Million (1Mby1M) Global Virtual Accelerator
Indian B-to-C startups started off with huge promise and were constantly compared with China’s Alibaba. But the reality has been consistently sobering. The Economist offers some excellent analysis on the phenomenon in two articles: India’s missing middle class and India has a hole where its middle class should be.
Some notable points:
Reports put out by management consultants routinely point to 300m-400m Indians in the ranks of the global middle class. HSBC, a bank, recently described nearly 300m Indians as “middle class”, a figure it thinks will rise to 550m by 2025.
But for some of the firms trying to tap this “bird of gold” opportunity, as McKinsey once called it, an awkward truth is making itself felt: a lot of this middle class has little money to spend. There are many rich people in India—but they number in the mere millions. There are a great many more who have risen above the poverty line—but not so far above it that they spend much on anything other than feeding their families. And there is less in between the two than meets the eye.
Companies that have tried to tap the Indian opportunity have found that returns fell short of the hype. Take e-commerce. The expectation that several hundred million Indians would shop online was what convinced Amazon and local rivals to invest heavily. Industry revenue-growth rates of well over 100% in 2014 and 2015 prompted analysts to forecast $100bn in sales by 2020, around five times today’s total.
That now looks implausible. In 2016, e-commerce sales hardly grew at all. At least 2017 looks a little better, with growth of 25-30%, according to analysts (see chart 1). But that barely exceeds the 20% the industry averages globally. Even after years of enticing customers with heavily discounted wares, perhaps 50m online shoppers are active in India—roughly, the richest 5-10% of the population, says Arya Sen of Jefferies, an investment bank. In dollar terms, growth in Indian e-commerce in 2017 was comparable to a week or so of today’s growth in China. Tellingly, few websites venture beyond English, a language in which perhaps only one in ten are conversant and which is preferred by the economic elite.
India has yet to move the needle for the world’s big tech groups. Apple made 0.7% of its global revenues there in the year to March 2017. Facebook, though it has 241m users in India, probably the most in the world in one country, registered revenues of just $51m in the same period. Google is growing more slowly in India than in the rest of the world. Mobile phones have become popular as their price has tumbled—but most handsets sold are basic devices rather than the smartphones that are ubiquitous elsewhere in the world.
Both articles are worth reading and their implications worth considering as capital continues to flow, defying objective analysis.
In addition, there are five major forces threatening India’s growth:
- Water Crisis: Indian states are already fighting water wars. The water situation in India is approaching unsustainable levels, and water wars with China are not inconceivable since the country’s main water sources are all in China-occupied Tibet.
- Environmental Disaster: Delhi is the most polluted city in the world. Bangalore is an environmental basket-case, newly dubbed the city of burning lakes. The city may be uninhabitable by 2025 because of pollution-related water shortages.
- Corruption: India has a corrupt justice system and a corrupt law-enforcement system. Vast majorities of people do not have the instruments with which to protect themselves from the friction it creates. As an example, let us say, a family has inheritance battles (many do), however large or small they may be. Let us say, one member of the family forges a will. Try going to court with it. Thirty years will go by without resolution.
- Automation: Artificial Intelligence will turn the Indian IT boom into a deflated balloon. All IT work that can be automated will be automated. Millions will lose their jobs.
- Sectarian Risk: India was a reasonably successful secular democracy for at least sixty years post-independence. No more. Unrest is boiling.
For now, India continues to grow at a decent pace.
Long term, I am concerned.
Looking For Some Hands-On Advice?
For entrepreneurs who want to discuss their specific businesses with me, I’m very happy to assess your situation during my free online 1Mby1M Roundtables, held almost every Thursday. You can also check out my LinkedIn Learning course here, my Lynda.com Bootstrapping course here, and follow my writings here.
Photo credit: Srinivasan L/Flickr.com
Heading the personal finance team at Mint
6 年Well said. The glass isn’t as full as it looks.
Data Analyst/ MBA Sports Management / MSc Marketing & Communications / Marketing Fanatic
6 年I think the basic thing would also come down to education. Education in terms of learning, understanding what one does and what one can do to know more. I feel there are many people who are just happy with "their job, their life & their well being". There has to be a drastic change in understanding people, technological advances and bygone ideas that rule the current thinking. It's okay not be defined, it's okay to study at the age of 30 and it sure as hell okay to make mistakes. I agree with the point above, but just thought this is valid too.
AI Research Engineer
6 年I agree with the overview presented in the article. The middle class is the potential market of India. With the increase in his worries about basic needs like water, food, shelter, and security will be a not good for the market growth. On top of it, the system is adding some more to makes it even more difficult. I believe it is not the economic model which needs the change the policy of the government its bodies needs the change.
job as divisional engineer in bsnl at Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
6 年What r the futures of LinkedIn
Engineering Manager II at HERE Technologies
6 年I did not get the 5th point. Does it have an underlying meaning to "influence" or bias?