Why do organizations prefer Agile Project Management over Traditional Project Management??

Before we jump on to the question first let’s understand in detail

Traditional Project Management (Waterfall)

Traditional project management, often referred to as the Waterfall method, follows a linear and sequential approach with 5 phases as listed below.

Initiating? ? —->? ? Planning????—->? ? Execution????—->? ? Monitoring and Controlling????—->? ? Closing

1. Initiation: Define the project scope and objectives.
2. Planning: Develop detailed plans, schedules, and budgets.
3. Execution: Implement the project plan.
4. Monitoring and Controlling: Track progress and make adjustments as needed.
5. Closure: Finalize all activities and formally close the project.

Key Characteristics:

• Structured Phases: Each phase must be completed before moving to the next.
• Detailed Documentation: Extensive documentation is created and maintained.
• Predictability: Clear expectations and timelines are set from the beginning.
• Less Flexibility: Changes are difficult to implement once the project is underway.

On the other hand the Agile Project Management has got few advantages in simple this Agile techniques allow the organizations to fail fast and fail cheap (if failed takes less time, less effort and less cost to company in case of any new big bang approach or any new experiments)

So Agile project management is an iterative and flexible approach. It is particularly suited for projects where requirements are expected to evolve and adapt over time. Agile methodologies include Scrum, Kanban, and Lean, among others.

Key Characteristics:

• Iterative Process: Work is divided into small, manageable chunks called iterations or sprints.
• Customer Collaboration: Continuous feedback from customers and stakeholders is emphasized.
• Flexibility: Changes can be incorporated at any stage based on feedback and evolving requirements.
• Self-organizing Teams: Teams are empowered to make decisions and organize their work.

?

Lets compare these two on key areas:

1. Approach: Traditional: Sequential, phase-based. Agile: Iterative, incremental.
2. Flexibility: Traditional: Less flexible, changes are difficult to implement. Agile: Highly flexible, changes are welcomed and managed.
3. Customer Involvement: Traditional: Limited to specific phases (e.g., requirements gathering, acceptance testing). Agile: Continuous involvement and feedback.
4. Documentation: Traditional: Extensive and detailed documentation. Agile: Minimum viable documentation to support the process.
5. Risk Management: Traditional: Risks are identified and planned for at the beginning. Agile: Risks are managed throughout the project with regular reassessments.

To conclude both traditional and agile project management have their strengths and are suited for different types of projects. Traditional methods work well for projects with well-defined requirements and a low likelihood of change. Agile methods excel in dynamic environments where flexibility and customer feedback are crucial. Choosing the right approach depends on the project's nature, stakeholder expectations, and the team's ability to adapt to changes.

#Projectmanagement #Agile-methodologies