Why diversity targets might be sabotaging your talent acquisition efforts
In pursuing a diverse and inclusive workplace, companies default to setting demographic diversity targets. While the intention is noble, there is a growing concern that an exclusive focus on quotas might be hindering, rather than helping, the goal of attracting diverse talent.
Let's delve into the risks associated with this approach and explore five recommendations for a more effective and nuanced strategy.
The Demographic Quandary:
While the push for diversity in the workplace is crucial, in a highly competitive talent market, relying solely on demographic quotas is increasingly leading to tokenism, where individuals are hired to meet numerical targets rather than for their qualifications or suitability for a team or role.
According to a study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology , teams that prioritise diversity for the sake of meeting quotas experience lower levels of team cohesion and, consequently, reduced productivity.
Similarly, The Harvard Business Review found that companies focusing solely on diversity quotas face higher turnover rates. Employees who feel they were hired for demographic reasons rather than merit are less likely to stay with the organisation in the long term.
Critically, when looking at company performance data, it is plausible to draw correlations to increased demographics resulting in increased performance but it is not demonstrable outside of circumstance. In our research , we found that whilst almost 90% of hiring managers said they were focused on diversity when hiring, only 25% admitted to looking for skills - the actual drivers of performance-related gains brought on by difference.
领英推荐
Diversity Targets Snapshot:
Statistics indicate that organisations are grappling with the unintended consequences of a myopic focus on demographics. A survey by the Harvard Business Review found that despite net gains in representation, 78% of respondents believed their companies prioritise diversity to meet quotas rather than fostering an inclusive, and high-performing culture.
Not only does this reality have compound impacts on everything from employer brand to collaboration and engagement. One bad hire, especially at senior levels, is enough to compromise years of diversity empowerment and progression in an organisation. It is better to hire fewer diverse people and ensure they are set up for success and thrive in the role, than hire many who are not appropriately qualified or cannot succeed due to compromised cultures.
Five Effective Diversity Strategies in Hiring:
The good news is, this isn't a conversation about talent availability. In all of our research and analytics, we've found that when we address arbitrary barriers to entry and develop inclusive processes and cultures, diverse talent representation thrives.
To get ahead of inclusive hiring in 2024, see what our experts have to say here and see our top recommendations below:
Achieving diversity in the workplace requires a strategic and nuanced approach that goes beyond mere demographic targets. By adopting inclusive, skills-based hiring technologies like Clu and prioritising inclusion in the attraction, evaluation and development process, organisations can tap into a wider pool of talent while upholding the standards of excellence.
It's not about lowering the bar; it's about widening the gate to welcome talent from all walks of life.
More than ever, the regulatory/legal requirements to report on diversity data conflict with organisational prioritisation. This leaves TA in the middle with business stakeholders who don't really care and a need to still hit representation targets. It's a very tough space to fill.
Co-Founder & CTO of Clu | Skills-Based Hiring | SaaS & Web Architecture Specialist | Retro Game Developer | Creative Problem Solver | Improving the economic mobility of 100M people
3 个月Very good advice here! Don’t let hitting the number becomes more important than what you’re trying to achieve ??