Why Deep Tech Doesn't Follow Startup Playbooks—And What to Do Instead
Startups thrive on frameworks. From Lean Startup to Blitzscaling, the traditional playbook tells entrepreneurs to launch fast, iterate based on customer feedback, and scale aggressively.
But deep tech follows a fundamentally different logic. These aren’t consumer products that can be tested, refined, and improved with quick user interactions. Instead, they are science-driven, industry-defining innovations that don’t just enter a market—they create one.
Deep tech doesn’t optimize for customer demand. It reshapes entire industries before they even know they need it (otherwise it wouldn't really be disruptive, would it?(; ). And that’s why the startup methodologies that work for software and e-commerce fail spectacularly in science-heavy ventures.
Why "Go-to-Market" Fails in Deep Tech
The biggest misconception? That science-driven innovations can follow the same commercialization process as SaaS or digital businesses. In software, the goal is simple: build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), test it on early adopters, and refine it based on their needs.
But what if the "customers" don’t even understand the technology yet?
Deep tech operates in domains where the laws of physics, chemistry, and biology dictate progress—not consumer feedback. You can’t “iterate” a quantum processor, a new biomaterial, or an autonomous industrial robot like a social media app. These innovations require years—sometimes decades—of development before they are even testable at scale.
Think: industrial integration.
Then there’s the regulatory burden. A SaaS company can launch an imperfect product and improve it on the go. But a biotech breakthrough needs clinical validation. A new energy storage solution requires certification and infrastructure before a single unit can be deployed. The cost of getting it wrong isn’t just losing users—it’s a complete regulatory shutdown.
Technology-Market Fit vs. Product-Market Fit
VCs love to ask about Product-Market Fit (PMF). They want to know whether customers love the product, whether adoption is scaling, and how soon the company can achieve exponential growth.
But in deep tech, Product-Market Fit is a myth—because there is no existing market to fit into. Instead, founders must focus on Technology-Market Fit (TMF):
?? Is the technology even feasible at scale? It’s not about demand—it’s about whether the scientific principles translate into an industrially viable product.
?? What infrastructure is needed for adoption? A startup can’t deploy an innovative hydrogen fuel system if the energy grid isn’t ready for it. A new semiconductor material won’t succeed if the foundries don’t support it.
?? Who needs to be convinced first? The customer isn’t always the first stakeholder. In biotech, regulators determine market entry. In energy, policymakers shape adoption. In materials science, industrial partners drive integration.
The Alternative: Proof-of-Scalability Before Proof-of-Market
Instead of MVPs, deep tech must prove itself through:
? Proof of Principle (PoP): Can the fundamental science be validated?
? Proof of Concept (PoC): Can the technology work outside the lab under real-world conditions?
? Proof of Scalability (PoS): Can it be produced reliably at an industrial scale?
Without these steps, even the most promising innovations won’t survive past early funding rounds. Investors who don’t understand this reality force deep tech startups into premature commercialization, often leading to failure.
Deep Tech Isn’t a Product—It’s Infrastructure
Deep tech doesn’t sell products—it builds foundations for future industries. That means the market entry strategy isn’t about launching an app or selling directly to consumers. Instead, it involves:
?? Industrial partnerships to integrate the technology into supply chains.
?? Regulatory roadmaps that align with policy shifts and compliance needs.
?? Hybrid funding strategies that blend grants, strategic investments, and industrial co-development.
Market creation doesn’t happen overnight, and deep tech startups must reverse-engineer their commercialization strategy based on these principles.
?? Want the full strategy on how deep tech companies create markets instead of entering them? Read more in our Communications and follow our channels.??
Yours, eM.
Driving sales maturity for tech startups and investors
5 天前Challenging, I tend to agree partly ?? I have seen several technical endeavors not or too late taking into account fields of application and market. Often used example is "If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." But validation of a market is not asking what they want but closely observing what they are trying to achieve. And this can be done while proofing principle, concept and scalability - what do you think?
SeaRanch Farms Think Different Eat Different Food you Love ??
6 天前This is exactly the issues SeaRanch Farms Www.searanchfarms.com Think Different Eat Different Food you Love ?? Is in. Being a first. New Tech proven, yet from across difference industries, all coming together, to Regenerate an industry into the Future. Food Production upon and within the ocean. It's beyond what most can see, believe, or understand. So, build on a small scale. Prototype all the systems. Give the tech away. Humanity can build food Sustainable Systems.
Scientist | Inventor | Entrepreneur
6 天前Maria Ksenia Witte Scientist entrepreneurs need to be very cautious about their inherent commercialisation conditions. They regularly have unique experience, unique understanding about the problem, unique solution proposal, and unaware clients and suppliers. Many stars must be aligned. Maybe not many useful advisors around - especially not investors. Vinod Khosla claims 90% of investors make no positive contributions, and 70% of investors do harm. Better find the 10% of investors that are helpful.
Helping Tech Founders, Agency and Business Owners Scale their Business | Outreach Expert | AI Founder Crunchbase and Apollo Alternative | Data Driven Deal Sourcing and Deal Flow for VCs | Ex-BMW | Ex-H&M | CBS
6 天前This really makes a strong point. What alternative metrics do you suggest for deep tech investment?