Why Darwin’s Theory Of Evolution Is Fake
The point, most of all, that prove evolution is fake, is that there is no evidence in observable reality that supports the idea of Darwin’s?theory of evolution. It’s one kind of?myth.
That evolution is without support from empirical science is known to scientists, of course, but none the less, evolution is taught in all educational institutions of the world as a scientific fact.
“Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, And the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX EVER.” — Dr.T.N.Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission
“We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.” —?Franklin Harold, Emeritus Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State University, in an Oxford University Press text.
The modern idea of language evolving from humans is basically ludicrous.
Lets take a look at the ramifications of the idea of evolution – first there were some chemicals. Then, by the interactions of those chemicals over long, long time, an amoeba-like creature was formed. Then this?amoeba?gradually, through countless intermediates, and over long, long time, grew legs and learned to talk.
How exactly language evolved from humans is something we never hear about. How did the first human learn to talk? Remember, the first human had just popped out of evolution, and lets not confuse the matter even more by asking if it was a he or a she, the point is that this first human was completely alone. No one to tell him or her anything.
领英推荐
So how did the first human, who had just evolved through millions of mutations in different species, how did this being acquire the ability to talk?
How exactly did the language of the first human evolve from some ape-like grunting to English? How did he go from grunt, grunt, huh, huh, to – hey honey, how was your day?
That’s something which has never been explained by evolutionists.
Another thing is that the first known language is Sanskrit, the most perfect and sophisticated language in the world. So while humans evolved from primitive to more advanced, language devolved from advanced to primitive. How does that fit into evolution? The answer is that it doesn’t.
“It remains a mystery how the undirected process of mutation, combined with?natural selection, has resulted in the creation of thousands of new proteins with extraordinarily diverse and well optimized functions. This problem is particularly acute for tightly integrated molecular systems that consist of many interacting parts.” –Two leading biologists in Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
“New species usually appear in the fossil record suddenly, not connected with their ancestors by a series of intermediates.”
–Eminent evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr
[Guest Post]
By Jahnu Das
Professor and HOD at SNGIST
1 年Yes .Evolution is myth and NOT science at all. There is No way a single cell creature like bacteria or amoeba can develop eyes or heart or blood by its own. A single cell creature like bacteria evolving by itself to become a creature like man or elephant is a stupid idea. Hope wisdom prevails and science community will reject Darwinism.
Student at Brooklyn Technical High School
1 年This is by far the strangest and weirdest take I've seen on this site concerning evolution, I've searched up a number of your quotes and many of them seem to be nit-picked. (Taken specifically in searching for this topic) If you go on the internet for almost a second and REALLY dive deep you'll find plenty of info supporting the co-existence of both evolution and religion. I encourage you to search the internet for info regarding why evolution DOES exist and you'll find overwhelming amounts of evidence supporting this theory. Despite this, your article does make an occasional logical point- that being that evolution is mostly still a theory- we haven't been around long enough to know for certain that it's true, that being said most scientists can say that their 99% sure the theory of evolution exists. Please give up on this crazy theory and accept that religion and science can intertwine.
Proofs, dates of experimental discoveries, and names of their discoverers are signs of good science. The purpose of science is to overcome wrong consensus. Consensus is not science. It can be bought by granting money to academics willing to publish what the grant requires, and it tends to lack those foundations. It's always good to teach why we know something is scientifically true and not just popular.