CX Is Hitting A Brick Wall

CX Is Hitting A Brick Wall

I appreciate this is a controversial title - but let me explain! Last year, I questioned whether Customer Experience had delivered the goods. This year, I question whether Customer Experience is the problem. This year, I think Customer Experience isn’t failing us; we are failing Customer Experience.

This whole line of thinking started last June with the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) score. ACSI uses an overall U.S. Customer Satisfaction score to denote the health of the economy. Since 1994, the ACSI score rose from 74.8 to 76.8 in 2013 —and then dropped to 75.2 by the end of 2014. The scores then show a steady decline across all four quarters last year, ending at 73.4. You can see the whole chart here.

This trend is, of course, a tad disappointing.

The idea of Customer Experience is that by improving it, you will increase your emotional engagement with your customers. They will feel positive toward your brand, like you more, form an emotional bond with you, become more loyal to you, and give you more of their business. It isn’t a stretch to assume they will be satisfied by the experience.

Many organizations say they have embraced Customer Experience. They say they have invested time and money into improving their Customer Experience.

But the ASCI continues to drop. Which begs the question, is investing in the Customer Experience worth it?

The answer is YES! We know that improving the CX does pay dividends. Our work with clients shows this to be the case.

Here are two examples:

Maersk Linewho have improved their net promoter score by 40 points in 30 months which resulted in a 10% increase in shipping volumes.

Ricoh Canada who improved their Net promoter score by 34 points in 30 months and have subsequently grown revenues by 10% year on year,  in a ‘shrinking printer usage market”.


So if this change is possible, why hasn’t the ASCI risen the way we expected with so many people embracing the concept of Customer Experience?

I have a theory, but bear with me; again it’s a bit controversial! Part of the reason Customer Experience hasn’t made the gains for companies that it should is because people are just jumping on the bandwagon, rebranding their jobs Customer Experience, but not doing anything differently.   

For example, only the other day I was talking to somebody who had Customer Experience in their job title. During the conversation, this person revealed the fact that he used to be in Customer Service. The rest of the conversation went like this:

Me:So, what are you doing differently now that you are in Customer Experience instead of Customer Service?

CX Professional:  Nothing.

Me: (Sigh)

Sadly, this situation isn’t uncommon for me. Too many people think that Customer Service is the same thing as Customer Experience. But it is MUCH more than that. It involves a careful examination of what emotions the experience evokes throughout the different moments, including how customers come into the experience. Customer Experience also creates cues for the subconscious, which can be positive or negative. Customer Experience is all the moments a customer has in an experience with you, not just the ones with the Customer Service team.

In the case of the fellow I was speaking with the other day, their management perception is 'they are doing Customer Experience now'. However, the reality is nothing has changed. To be honest, they don't know what they are doing.

The danger that my industry faces is that with Customer Experience being the vogue topic these days, everybody talks about it—even when they have no idea what it is or how to use it. As a result, nothing changes. The same outcomes exist because the same problems cause them. Only now, instead of seeing the problems in the experience itself and blaming them, the whole concept of Customer Experience takes the blame for overpromising and under-delivering..

Customer Experience isn’t the same thing as Customer Service. It is more than a title change or a catch phrase. It is more than a fad; it’s the competitive differentiator you need at a time when competition is fierce and not likely to ease up anytime soon.

When I started consulting back in 2002, no one knew what Customer Experience was. Now, in 2016, some still don’t. As I said, everybody has jumped on the Customer Experience bandwagon. You hear the term everywhere. You also hear a lot of ideas about what it is. We define it as:

A customer’s perception of their rational, physical, emotional, subconscious, and psychological interaction with any part of an organization. This perception affects Customer behaviors and builds memories, which drive Customer loyalty and affects the economic value an organization generates.

I would argue that most of the people on the bandwagon today don’t really appreciate what a Customer experience entails. I would argue that they certainly don’t go into the depths of what this definition includes. In other words they don’t know what they don’t know. As a consequence they don’t make the progress that Maersk Line and Ricoh Canada has.

Listen, your competition would love nothing more than for you to carry on thinking that Customer Service and Customer Experience are the same things. But if you want to help your organization perform better and actually be better, you have to learn what Customer Experience is and do the hard work associated with improving it.

You have a choice to make:

#1: Do nothing…and get the same results you always have.

#2: Jump on the bandwagon and say you know what Customer Experience is when you don’t…and still get the same results you always have.

#3: Be a part of the movement that is designed to help you carve out a competitive difference at a time when a competitive difference is hard to come by. You can do the work needed to create a Customer Experience that makes your customers feel good about your brand, bond with you emotionally, and come back for more.

What will you choose?

Make sure you know the true meaning of Customer Experience and help move your company to the next level. Join Beyond Philosophy for the Certified Advanced CEM Training.

LinkedIn followers receive $225 discount - use LinkedIn225 code.

If you enjoyed this post, you might be interested in the following blogs:

Key Learning from 15 Years of Net Promoter Stats

‘Top 50 Marketing Thought Leader’ Reveals Latest Trend

Has Customer Experience Delivered the Goods?

Colin Shaw is the founder and CEO ofBeyond Philosophy, one of the world's leading Customer experience consultancy & training organizations. Colin is an international author offive bestselling books and an engaging keynote speaker.

Follow Colin Shaw on Twitter & Periscope@ColinShaw_CX

Jim Carras

Board Member Homegrown National Parks

8 年

Just from my viewpoint, CX addresses symptoms of a companies problems regarding creating value for their customers. With a focus on the touchpoints and not the root cause which is the company itself. To me CX is the tail wagging the dog (the company). When we talk about the root cause, we are talking about the entire company and its ability to focus on the customer at every level and every decision. This includes such activities as pricing, big data, product development, CRM, marketing, employees, stakeholders... etc. I believe the missing link is the company engaging in creating customer value which includes the holistic and integrated (root cause) changes that result in customers who find perceived value. CX is an important and necessary component of this change... but I don't think CX is the total panacea. Thoughts?

回复
Doug Morse

Creator of Customer Value

8 年

Colin, Excellent and to the point . Our experience is much the same. We have seen to much of CX move under the CMO and staff directed to respond to issues but very few are in charge of designing the customer journey or looking to understand the best customer outcomes that help to move those needles around CSI. Companies that get it, see the results. Those that see it as window dressing are wasting their money and annoying their customers. One of the keys is tying the customer experience and satisfaction to financial results.

Tania Van der Merwe

BI Specialist Lead at Vertice data solutions.

8 年

Totally agree with you Ilhaam. I always value your views as you are a leader in the field.

回复
Ilhaam Cook

Business management Professional

8 年

I agree with you Colin. Great article. I have found in practice that especially leadership becomes rather squeamish when they are faced with customer experience as a discipline (including Fair treatment of customers) and prefer the term and accompanying activities of customer service (rather reactive I believe). This misunderstanding of what customer experience is and what it is not is what I believe to be the primary barrier to the commitment of resources and energy to execute customer experience strategies. Using and getting hung up on buzz words is also a massive drawback. Buzzwords alienate and exclude potential participants which is counter productive when all within the company should recognise their contributions to improving customers' experiences of the company's brand (and not only the customer experience team). Demystifying customer experience (including the sciences) or more eloquently from Colin: Beyond the Philosophy is what it has been about for me over the years. You are what you measure, but a 'thousand' questions questionnaire with a rating scale that a few gifted people are able to use and delivering results that a handful understand add to people's discomfort to support customer experience as a real game changer.

回复
Christiaan Van Der Ven

Budlr verlaagt drempels van financi?le zorg voor werknemers, inwoners en ondernemers | Eén loket | Eén drempelloze klantreis | Eén bron met informatie

8 年

CX has been a tricky concept since it was ‘invented’. Everyone feels what it means (and it’s hard to disagree with the general idea) but one is often struggling to make it really work for the long run. The reason – for me – comes close to organizing a solid or even great service experience. I often think: is CX not the ‘reinvented’ service of the new era? Don’t customer in the first place refer to an experience as “a great service”? The main reason organization fail CX is because they fail to create a top-down and integrated CX structure and culture. Instead they create a separate CX department like the example of Colin (also a big obstacle for great service experience), leave the traditional vertical silo’s in place and lack to stimulate a customer first culture from the top down. With a right integrated CX set-up one creates a situation where everyone and everything is working together to ensure a great experience for the customer. Even more so: in this type of organizations customer disappoints are quickly spotted and recovered. Especially in larger, short term oriented organizations this challenge seems to be the hardest.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Colin Shaw的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了