Why Conscious Sustainalism,the best nextgen capitalism to prevent critical-mass imbalance eating brotherhood economics for breakfast,per Cain/A story?

Why Conscious Sustainalism,the best nextgen capitalism to prevent critical-mass imbalance eating brotherhood economics for breakfast,per Cain/A story?

1. Introduction

Couple of weeks ago, we had published a video on the topic of conscious leadership mitigating the “cultural collective consciousness imbalances” within organizations (including communities/countries/world). As expected, we received some follow-up questions -- and if I may quote one --

Why do these "cultural collective consciousness imbalances" continue to linger within organizations, in spite of stellar leaders leading them with impeccable leadership?

Well, as I thought about it deeply, one of the key reasons (among other things) for them to continue to linger within organizations is due to the following

Lack of sufficient critical-mass, that is needed to sustain the collective consciousness of an organization to an situation appropriate state -- which is what then starts eating everything else for breakfast!

Which then also raises another question -- --

What do we do, when these "critical mass caused consciousness imbalances" start eating everything (including brotherhood economics) for breakfast?

Well, we have answered it this week in this video, using our firm's "one and only Einstein field equation based sovereignty/destiny model of Planet Earth, including another popular Cain and Abel story".

First things first --

First, as we analyzed the Cain & Abel story using a "brotherhood economics" lens, we asked ourselves the following questions

  1. Why was Abel's offering accepted whereas Cain's was not?
  2. Why was Cain not conscious of the right way to worship/work, while Abel was?
  3. With this Cain-Abel story being the first blood-shedding story in history (where the “critical mass imbalance” started eating brotherhood economics for breakfast) -- what is the best way to prevent it from happening again?

And here are our findings.....

2. Why was Abel's offering accepted whereas Cain's was not?

As you know as well as I do, some of the traditional answers to this question include, but not limited to are

-- Abel’s intention was pure whereas Cain’s intention was not!

-- Abel offered it in faith whereas Cain did not (from Hebrews 11)

-- Abel offered the best portion whereas Cain did not

While all of these explanations are all still valid, when I dived deeper, it just dawned on me that there is an interesting critical mass?insight buried deep inside!

For example, the Hebrew root (??·?ō·rō?”) used for firstborn in Gen 4:4-5, implies the very same critical mass (CM) idea needed to sustain worship & work (or? ????????) in such a way to sustain them for generations to come.?

Simply put,

Abel provided the firstborn (??·?ō·rō?) as the critical mass (or seed) that needs to be sustained during every season (as per the worship=work MISSION), so that we can sustain Worship & Work for generations to come!

Which then brings us to the next question.....

3. Why was Cain not conscious of the right way to worship/work, while Abel was?

Without going too much into the Cain-Abel story, I am of the view that Abel learned it consciously from their parents (Adam/Eve) whereas Cain failed to do so. In other words, it all comes down to us being conscious of the sustainable way to perform worship and work (per Planet Earth Inc's mission "work = worship", as explained in an earlier article).This precisely is the reason, we as a firm have developed a comprehensive curriculum to teach everyone the sustainable way to perform work and worship, in an integrated manner, which brings us to the next question.

4.With this Cain-Abel story being the first blood-shedding story in history (where the “critical mass imbalance” started eating brotherhood economics for breakfast), what is the best way to prevent it from happening again?

While the idea of conscious learning is a step in the right direction, our work/research (done under our firm's larger umbrella of Virtual/Conscious Ocean of Everything -- VOE/COE/VizPlanet) also suggests the need for a next generation capitalism approach called?“Conscious Sustainalism”, so that we can institutionalize this thinking across the board.

Turns out, I had explained this in detail in this video, using our firm's "one and only Einstein field equation based sovereignty/destiny model of Planet Earth". And if I may summarize them here --

We have formulated five “Conscious Sustainalism” techniques (that has been developed by?advancing five Nobel winning/nominated ideas) to help us balance these “critical mass imbalances” -- and interestingly enough, they all happen to align perfectly with the five components of our master sovereignty equation (LHS), as summarized below.

  1. Individual/Cumulative consciousness (M + B + G) ->? Individual consciousness driven self-interest pillar of the current capitalism model (that is based on Maslow's Nobel nominated hierarchical needs model) augmented by our firm's holacracy needs model, in such a way to incentivize it with “conscious choice appropriate CM enabling ?offerings & incentives" — that is further conditioned by our firm's “Consciousness enabling self mastery driven framework of everything called Conscious Ocean(COE)”
  2. Collective/Cumulative consciousness (M+ B + G) -> Collective consciousness driven competitive market pillar of the current capitalism model (that is built based on Adam Smith/Friedman's Nobel nominated invisible hand of "cooperate without coercion") being augmented by our firm's complementary purpose driven collaborative competition model with an invisible hand definition of "collaborate without coercion" in such a way to multiply the value pie size with an 1+1= 3 mindset before competing to divide it -- that is then sustained using “conscious collective choice ?appropriate CM enabling offerings & incentives ” and our firm's “Purpose/Business mastery driven framework of everything called Conscious Ocean(COE)”.
  3. Nature -> Resource ownership and resource constraint pillars of current capitalism models (more specifically Robert Solow's Nobel winning factor of productivity theory) augmented by our firm’s?VRE?portfolio driven capital/resource allocation driven productivity theory and “Purpose score(like credit score) driven sustainability mission appropriate P&S offerings & incentives” – and implemented ?by our firm's “sustainability mastery driven business model framework/platform/marketplace of everything called Virtual Ocean (VOE/VizPlanet)" at community/country/world level.
  4. Grace ? ?-> ?Credit, that is conditioned by the Grace=Gravity metaphor driven Conscious flow using our firm’s “conscious breathing flow theory (aka conscious pranya flow theory”, that has been developed by amplifying Friedman's Nobel nominated plucking theory) -- and institutionalized it by reimagining economy as a?breathing cycle?within a musical instrument called human consciousness of pluckable senses.?
  5. Outcome? ->?Friedman's Nobel nominated "Free to choose" theory augmented by our firm's "Conscious to choose" theory, so that??every choice can be fed back to next decision, thus creating an ? integrated cyclical consciousness mindset, as explained in an earlier article.

(Note : Just to give you an order of magnitude of how complex this equation is — the individual consciousness component (which we have represented in simple linear form as M+B+G=A for better understanding), in reality is a set of 10 differential equations. Similarly, let us say,10 more people around us have influence/control over an action at every node level -- it will add another 100 differential equations to the solution space at every node. On top of it, when we factor in the impacts from the cumulative components from previous decisions, including the energy cycles of all resources that come along with it, as you know as well as I do, this can become a humongous solution space of integrating thousands of differential equations at every node, as explained in this?video sermon/talk. Similarly, to the question of using relativity theory to model this reality, as opposed to quantum and string theories -- well, both quantum and string theories inherently do not help us to model reality as accurately as possible. For example, our research clearly suggests that?string theory is more of a theoretical model with not much of experimental data behind it whereas quantum theory is more of a mathematical model with no concrete sense of reality, as affirmed by Sir Roger Penrose as well. This is where, relativity theory fits the bill perfectly, as establishing the causality among human consciousness fields?(and their outcomes within the sovereignty model) is the objective here and not necessarily to measure/solve them in totality. And that precisely is the reason we have solved it in a simpler LE mode for now. However, for all practical purposes, one can imagine this reality (or consciousness or sovereignty) as a causal tree of all predestined actions (past + present +?future) within one's consciousness only. In other words, the rationale behind this pragmatic abstraction here is to help everyone to navigate this causal tree effectively/efficiently/effortlessly, by balancing their consciousness field during every choice, similar to how celestial bodies balance their energy fields during every cycle. In other words, once humanity learns to navigate this sovereign blueprint (as accurately as possible) using this five part sovereignty equation, all problems of humanity will be solved automatically. An implication here is --?"Consciousness Imbalance of this equation is the root cause of all problems of humanity", as?proved in this article).

Not to mention these five "Conscious Sustainalism" prescriptions align perfectly with the five "mastery courses" provided by our firm as well. Similarly, when it comes to the institutionalization of this approach, our experience suggests that it takes a dedicated transformation program (in case of companies) or reformation (in case of countries) so that we can?institutionalize?these types of "conscious learning cultures" among all stakeholders, in an integrated manner as well. A?pragmatic first step is to augment the internal training curriculum of corporations (including the education curriculum of schools) with our firm's five VOE/COE mastery courses, right from kindergarten levels -- and?they include but not limited to are?

  • Self Mastery -- Over and beyond the regular?learning,?help everyone to discover their personal purpose/passion/skills/talents/gifts in alignment with company/country's purpose/constitution etc. using our firm's “Consciousness enabling self mastery driven framework of everything called Conscious Ocean(COE)”
  • Purpose/Calling/ Business Mastery -- to help everyone to solve problems as per their life/organization's purpose in a collaborative manner (with a complementary purpose mindset), using an integrated approach like our firm's “Consciousness enabling purpose/business mastery driven framework of everything called Conscious Ocean(COE)”
  • Community Mastery -- to help everyone to be aware of the implications of their problems and its solutions to the community (especially to the sustainability problem space) using our firm's “Sustainability mastery driven business model framework /platform/ marketplace of everything called Virtual Ocean (VOE/VizPlanet)"
  • National Mastery --??to help everyone to be aware of the implications of their problems and its solutions to their nation (especially to the sustainability problem space) using our firm's “Sustainability mastery driven business model framework /platform/ marketplace of everything called Virtual Ocean (VOE/VizPlanet)"
  • World Mastery --??to help everyone to be aware of the implications of their problems and its solutions to the world (especially to the sustainability problem space) using our firm's “Sustainability mastery driven business model framework /platform/ marketplace of everything called Virtual Ocean (VOE/VizPlanet)"

5. Conclusion

In the final analysis, it all comes down to the following

Abel was fully conscious of the proper way to worship/work, whereas Cain was not -- and that precisely is the reason, Abel was able to provide the firstborn (??·?ō·rō?) as the critical mass (or seed) that is needed to sustain the next season (as per the worship=work MISSION statement of Plane Earth Inc), so that we can sustain Worship & Work for generations to come!!

Sure enough, the name for our capitalism approach comes from the following two words that respectively symbolize the following:

  1. "Conscious" to symbolize Cain's failure to worship/work consciously, further reminding us the need to balance the first two components of the five part sovereignty equation consciously (individual and collective consciousness components)
  2. "Sustainalism" to symbolize Abel's consciousness to worship/work sustainably as per the Planet Earth Inc's mission statement (WORSHIP IS WORK and WORK IS WORSHIP), further reminding us the need to balance the remaining three components of the five part sovereignty equation (Nature, Grace and Outcome components)

This is where, "Conscious Sustainalism" fits the bill perfectly, in the sense, it helps us to balance all the five components of Planet Earth's sovereignty/destiny equation simultaneously. And that precisely is yet another reason, we are fully convinced that CONSCIOUS SUSTAINALISM (that has been developed by advancing five Nobel winning/nominated ideas) is the best next generation capitalism approach, especially when it comes to tackling the most pressing sustainability challenges of the 21st century. Sure enough, Prof Clay Christensen of Harvard said it best -- and I paraphrase

Our firm's COE/VOE/VizPlanet driven Capitalism approach ("Conscious Sustainalism") is a Nobel Prize quality work -- and I leave it for you to decide!
Ali Anani, PhD

Columnist & Featured Contributor at BIZCATALYST 360

3 年

Reading your very insightful article Charles Prabakar made me wonder why such a thought-provoking post receives no comments. Why such serious posts receive little attention as compared to shallow posts that has hundreds of likes and quick comments with little meaning? The critical mass issue is a pivotal point that you highlight wonderfully in your post. I am thinking of why cultures fail to merge and the reasoning you provide and the sense they make. Maybe we should apply the same analysis to make meaningful posts more attractive to the readers.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Charles Prabakar的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了