?? Why the Command & Control Model Falls Short in Fostering Employee Engagement ???
The first industrial revolution began in the late 18th century and lasted until the mid-19th century. So, approximately 150-200 years have passed since the first industrial revolution took place....I started to think over whether such business models born long time ago are still valid nowadays. Obviously not...but the real question is: if these models are outdated, inadequate for our society today, why are many, too many companies still so tied to them? Considering the inexorable failure, why they are not willing to open themselves to different methodologies, approaches?
?? In today's rapidly changing business landscape, traditional command and control cultures are proving to be inadequate in creating a thriving and engaged workforce. There are some evidences? Yes there are. Here's some of them:
1?? Lack of Autonomy: The command and control model is characterized by strict hierarchies and micromanagement, leaving little room for employees to exercise autonomy. This approach stifles creativity, innovation, and individual growth, leading to disengagement and a lack of motivation among team members.
2?? Limited Collaboration: In a command and control culture, decision-making is centralized at the top, resulting in a lack of collaboration and input from employees. When individuals are not encouraged to share their ideas, expertise, and perspectives, it hampers innovation and stifles the collective intelligence of the organization.
3?? One-Way Communication: In this model, communication primarily flows in a top-down fashion, with little emphasis on open dialogue or feedback. As a result, employees feel disconnected from the decision-making process, leading to a lack of trust and engagement. Effective communication should be a two-way street, promoting transparency, active listening, and employee involvement.
领英推荐
4?? Limited Growth Opportunities: Command and control cultures often focus on rigid job descriptions and fixed roles, leaving little room for personal and professional growth. When employees feel stagnant and see no opportunities for development, they are more likely to disengage and seek new challenges elsewhere. Empowering employees with learning and growth opportunities is essential to foster engagement and retention.
5?? Lack of Purpose and Meaning: A command and control culture tends to prioritize short-term goals and profitability, often neglecting the larger purpose and values that drive employee motivation. Without a clear sense of purpose and alignment with meaningful values, individuals struggle to find personal fulfillment in their work, leading to disengagement and decreased productivity.
? What do I think overall? Well that It's time for a shift! To create an engaged and high-performing workforce, organizations need to embrace a more empowering and inclusive culture. This means promoting autonomy, fostering collaboration, encouraging open communication, providing growth opportunities, and aligning employees with a shared purpose.
?? I have a dream:) Let's move away from command and control and embrace a culture that values trust, empowerment, and the full potential of every individual. Together, we can create a workplace where engagement thrives, innovation flourishes, and employees truly feel a sense of belonging! ????
I guide Business Owners and CEOs to Achieve Organizational Excellence Through Strategic Transformation | Unlock full potential of you business now! | Message me to learn how.
1 年Thank you for sharing this analysis! Even though the Command & Control still remains among the most widespread leadership practices, the more and more current reality proves that standards and basics of Scientific Management does not pay off any more. New methods and approaches are required to keep people engaged and performing. Leadership is changing towards what fits better to VUCA and what is better accepted by current and future generations of employees.