Why AWS is the best place for your Windows workloads, and how Microsoft is changing their licensing to try to awkwardly force you into Azure
Sandy Carter
Chief Operating Officer l ex-AWS l ex-IBM | Forbes Contributor | Board of Directors | AI Expert l Blockchain Expert l
Many companies today are considering how to migrate to the cloud to take advantage of the agility and innovation that the cloud brings. Having the right to choose the best provider for your business is critical.
AWS is the best cloud for running your Windows workloads and our experience running Windows applications has earned our customers’ trust. It’s been more than 10 years since AWS first made it possible for customers to run their Windows workloads on AWS—longer than Azure has even been around, and according to a report by IDC, we host nearly two times as many Windows Server instances in the cloud as Microsoft. And more and more enterprises are entrusting their Windows workloads to AWS because of its greater reliability, higher performance, and lower cost, with the number of AWS enterprise customers using AWS for Windows Server growing more than 400% in the past three years.
In fact, we are seeing a trend of customers moving from Azure to AWS. eMarketer started their digital transformation with Azure, but found performance challenges and higher costs that led them to migrate all of their workloads over to AWS. Why did they migrate? They found a better experience, stronger support, higher availability, and better performance, with 4x faster launch times and 35% lower costs compared to Azure. Ancestry, a leader in consumer genomics, went all-in on development in the cloud moving 10 PB data and 400 Windows-based applications in less than 9 months. They also modernized to Linux with .NET Core and leveraged advanced technologies including serverless and containers. With results like that, you can see why organizations like Sysco, Edwards Life Sciences, Expedia, and NextGen Healthcare have chosen AWS to upgrade, migrate, and modernize their Windows workloads.
We also have seen many companies use their migration to the cloud as a chance to modernize their IT and break free from the old guard vendors. This is really prevalent in the database industry where customers are flocking to Amazon Aurora, the relational database built for the cloud. And Microsoft’s announcements earlier this week certainly seem like they’ve been taken from the old guard software vendor playbook. First – trying to put an end to Bring Your Own License (BYOL) for Windows Server purchased after October 1, 2019. In case you didn’t catch it, the announcement restricted customers’ ability to bring their own, purchased licenses to their preferred cloud, including AWS, when using licenses purchased after October 1, 2019, or running future versions of Windows Server released after that date. Second, Microsoft is trying to limit your choice around SQL Server. For example, if you are running SQL Server on the AWS cloud with Dedicated Host without Software Assurance (SA) (which is allowed today) and want to upgrade to a newer version after October 1, you would be required to purchase a new SQL Server license with SA. Despite these changes, AWS will continue to provide you the best platform with multiple options to run Windows Server and SQL Server to fit your business needs.
Now, while these changes might not seem as restrictive as yet another threat of a software audit, this isn’t the first time Microsoft has made “subtle” changes to its licensing that are slowly chipping away at your options. In 2018, Microsoft removed customer’s rights to bring your SQL Server licenses to AWS and use them with our managed service, Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS). The cloud enables your company’s agility and innovation. Do you really want to bring along the licensing baggage of the old world, especially if those rights continue to change? At AWS, our goal is to provide our customers with choice. Microsoft wants you to believe that this is just “removal of outsourcing rights”, but Microsoft is looking to restrict what computer you can use. And what cloud.
If you are interested in seeing your cost savings over running on-premises or over running on Azure, send us an email at [email protected] or visit why AWS is the best cloud for Windows.
Chef de projet / coordination IT- Atos
5 年Gérald S.?un avis ? ;-)
Cofounder of ndallies.org, ex-Google, ex-Amazon, ex-Microsoft. MBA Foster School of Business at University of Washington, Stanford Advanced Computer Security Certificate, Ally and inclusion advocate.
5 年Whoa, I thought I was on Twitter for a moment. No, this is good news! You always have other options. SQL Server was awesome 20 years ago. If you’re stressed out about where you should run your 20 year old app, you need to realize your competitors are modernizing and leveraging significantly newer data technologies that your ol’ SQL Server won’t be able to compete with - no matter which of the 3 top clouds you run it on. I get it that AWS needs to care about SQL Server workloads to hit their numbers, but if we in the cloud industry are truly prescriptive and customer obsessed, we help our customers modernize. That’s almost never SQL Server post client-server era. It’s one of the best products ever created by MS, but it’s rarely relevant today (except for those old apps). I think it’s great to give customers another reason to consider modernizing. Let the innovation begin! If you don’t do it, your competitors will.
Manager, Desktop Services
5 年After a former AWS staff member hacked Capital One on Amazon, no one should trust the platform. This is one of the reasons the DoD is reviewing the JEDI contract. The second reason the DoD policy is not to place their IT contracts with any one vendor.
Azure GTM Lead @ Microsoft | AI and ML Professional | FinOps Practitioner & Engineer
5 年I’m not sure AWS is cheaper than Azure for Enterprise Customers with EA (Software Assurance with Azure Hybrid Benefit) and on 3-years reserved instances. In this situation you reach almost 80% discount compared in the on-demand cost. Also.. I don’t understand the fight on IaaS that is the less agile model you have in the cloud.. fight should move in the PaaS and Container world... and I think here Microsoft has the best PaaS options because of great “integration” (Where is the AWS version of Office365?? The real azure-enabler in many customers) and Containers where Google is the leader..
Cloud Architect | Microsoft MVP | DevOps Specialist
5 年AWS is listed at?Authorized Mobility Partner, and this is the way to move with the changes, changes that not only applies to AWS, but to Azure as well