Why Australian Enterprises Suck at Innovation - and What to Do about it.
Finbar OHanlon - CCInO, CInP
Human Centred Ai Specialist - Imagineer, Polymath, (Creativity, Innovation, Systems, Technology)
Yesterday I finished facilitating an Innovation Accelerator, a lunch time program helping attendees understand what applied innovation is and how to successfully drive innovation using the incredible knowledge provided by GInI - Global Innovation Institute .
This morning one of those attendees, a great innovator in his own right Philippe Guichard created a post on LinkedIn sharing his thoughts about the session.
One of the questions Philippe received was from Anthony Bonnici his question: "how does Finbar suggest we "de-risk" innovation?
This question drew out a long response from me, one which formed the basis for this article "Why Australian Enterprises Suck at Innovation - and What to do about it."
In Oct 22 Catriona Wallace authored an article in the The Australian Financial Review "A nation unprepared for new technologies". This article talks in a large part about Australia's ranking on the 2022 Global Innovation index.
When we look at the Innovation outputs in this year's innovation index, Australia ranks 30th.
If Innovation was a sport we would surely be ashamed of our worldwide position, a top place in the world innovation standings might not be as aspirational "to some" as sport, but it would arguably bring our nation much greater long term prosperity than almost anything else, sport included.
So in response to Anthony Bonnici 's great question "how does Finbar suggest we De-Risk innovation" I put forward this response, a response driven through my training as a GInI - Global Innovation Institute certified Innovation professional and Chief Innovation officer.
My response...........
"To de-risk innovation we need to change our starting point. We need to shift Tactical led innovation to Strategically led innovation.
Too often Australian organisations approach innovation as a creative ideation process, playing around, coming up with ideas, treating innovation as something required to build fancy new things. When ideas are generated without a clear understanding of needs, there is a risk of developing solutions that don't address real problems, or provide value to the intended stakeholder. There may be a tendency to evaluate and judge ideas based on personal biases or assumptions, Ideas can be generated without considering feasibility, the ideas may be unrealistic or impractical to implement and can lead to a scattered or unfocused ideation process, with a wide range of unrelated or disjointed ideas.
Sound Familiar?
The mathematical probability of someone coming up with an idea that satisfactorily addresses all the unmet needs, without knowing who they are, or whether or not they are satisfied, is close to zero.
Let's call this approach the Tactical led approach or the "risky' approach, for obvious reasons.
领英推荐
Innovation is not just about generating new ideas, it is a strategic endeavour that requires careful planning, execution, and alignment with an organisation's overall business strategy, a strategy that provides those in tactical innovation teams with a well defined context, required prior to any other phase of innovation work. (validation of problem statements, ideation or mid zone brand, production, distribution strategies.etc)
So how do we shift the needle, how do we learn to not "Suck? at Innovation, how do we start developing a Strategic approach to Innovation, an approach that "de-risks" innovation, provides the guide rails, the governance, the support, the people, the direction that forms the context for the innovation hunting grounds?
Let's start by understanding some of the steps required.
Pursuing innovation through a strategically aligned set of systems, processes, and methods is crucial for Australian organisations to remain competitive "de-risk innovation and thrive in today's business landscape.
By adopting a comprehensive approach that encompasses the key elements outlined in this article organisations can effectively start to "de-risk" their innovation efforts and through using Frameworks, systems and knowledge from organisations like GInI - Global Innovation Institute these prganisations can achieve sustainable success.
It is important to recognise that innovation is not a one-size-fits-all endeavour, and organisations must tailor their approach to suit their unique size, capabilities, and strategic objectives. By doing so, Australian organisations can unlock the full potential of innovation and drive long-term growth and resilience.
My goal with this article is to start a conversation as to how we as a nation might uplift our innovation outputs, building long term prosperity for our nation.
"
Developing & Managing Athlete Careers, NIL & IP using Tech | Host of Infinite 8 Podcast | AMA Solutions Inc. Co-Founder | Lux Partner | Hanzo AI | Mintistry of Culture DAO | XX Supporter
6 个月if this is followed then Australia has a good chance, to move up the ranks. I think that these are the steps we should all implement, as someone who is always being brought in to help innovation without having this checklist followed first before i waste my thoughts and ideas. As we read it seems like a very practical thought process, however when it comes to enterprises its often overlooked which leads to nothing happening or a more half hearted attempt. Good stuff my friend.
Innovation is key to success, let's unlock the potential together. ?? Finbar OHanlon (MAICD)
Decarbonisation, Strategy, Innovation, Startups and Strategic Marketing.
6 个月A good piece Finbar, thank you for sharing. There are a lot of people in Australia hungry for innovation delivered and the progress that brings. We need to bring them together so they can galvanise and support each other.
iGen Foundation Director and Strategic Advisor, Enterprising Partnerships Strategic Advisor and Owner/ Startup Facilitator / Board Member / Dreammaker / Wise Counsel
6 个月Catherine Livingstone once presented on innovation and she usefully differentiated between invention and innovation. The former will lead to innovation only when there is a user who sees value they’re willing to pay for (here pay is a broad term). Before that it is a step component of ideation. Invention can be free flowing, exploratory and open ended (subject to available time) but can never be seen to be innovation. The value of death between ideation (including invention) can be de-risked by the strategic approach referred to here in Finbar OHanlon (MAICD)’s article. For Australia to again become a manufacturing nation we will need investment in ideation and in the strategic innovation, both are critical in generating what Professor Goran Roos refers to as the heat cell for innovation where multiple ideations come together strategically to bring about highly innovative communities through the bringing together of disparate ideas to produce what is eventually an innovation.
Delivering Food, Beverage and Business growth | COO Gippsland Jersey
6 个月Great summary.