Why aren't there more Singaporean sports stars?
Chris J Reed
$888 per month is all it costs to market you and your firm on LinkedIn to get you new clients or a new job. I am "The Only CEO with a Mohawk" and Singaporean entrepreneur with 2,200+ LinkedIn Recommendations.
It’s been a while now since Singapore’s latest sports star Joseph Schooling beat Michael Phelps to gold in a swimming race at the Rio Olympics. Everyone still remember him? I am sure if you were to forget at any stage in the next 20 years the Singapore authorities will be reminding you that he is and may remain it’s only Olympic Gold Medalist.
To many people Schooling’s win merely highlighted the fact that Singapore had never won a gold before not that it was a reason for over hyped congratulations. After all the beaten Michael Phelps won another 5 golds to add to his collection of 23 gold’s. Losing one didn’t seem to matter that much to him.
For such a competitive country in the business context that loves outdoor activities and where obesity is not a problem (despite the plethora of fast food outlets next to sports and fitness venues) it’s amazing that Singaporeans do seem especially poor at competitive sport.
Many Singaporeans will tell you it’s the size of the country (5.4 million) but that argument doesn't stack up. You see countries smaller such as Iceland (population 350,000) reaching the quarterfinals of EURO 2016 or Wales (population 3 million) reaching the semifinals or the New Zealand All Blacks being Rugby World Champions twice in a row (population 4.5 million) plus all the other countries at the Olympics smaller than Singapore yet winning medals and not celebrating as if they had solved world peace it puts Singapore’s win in context. Jamaica’s population is only 2.7 million yet they took home 6 gold medals.
But why is this? Why is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, with sports facilities coming out of every corner, with a climate perfect for all round training, a fit and competitive population not bothered about competing in sports tournaments and more to the point not winning them or even coming close?
The national football team for example are never liked by anyone here and often joked about. No local aspires to play for them and no one wears their national team football top in the street. Singaporean’s like supporting winners not losers. There are more German and Spanish tops worn here by locals than Singaporean ones. Hence their love of whoever has just won the Premier League or Champions League. Especially if they play in red....
Is it National Service?
Many people in the local media have highlighted that Schooling won his gold because he postponed National Service (NS) and didn’t even train in Singapore (thank you Texas). In fact many people have complained that he was allowed not to do NS and many more that it was apparently some foreigners who wrote to the NS Board to get him excused, not any locals, in order for him to focus on his swimming which ultimately ended up with him winning gold. Does this hinder or help?
Of course NS doesn’t explain why women, who are very competitive and entrepreneurial in Singaporean business, are also not doing well in team or individual sports….
Is it a lack of sponsorship?
Marketing Magazine and others have pointed out that sponsors and brands were happy to associate themselves with Schooling after he won gold but were not seen supporting him on his journey to gold. There remains a big investment gap here which for a country as rich as Singapore that is obsessed with image and brand remains a mystery. Imagine what you could do with the hundreds of millions that the Singapore Grand Prix costs each year to put on if you invested that in Singaporean athletes or even the football team…..
Is it the call of working in a bank?
Whereas people in the West now openly despise the thought of working in a bank or even knowing people who do so, people in Asia still consider it a glamorous position. Steady job, no hassle, no pressure, your mum and dad and all their friends have heard of it, % discount of your mortgage for your HDB/condo/house, etc etc. Where’s the kudos in being a failed athlete?
Is it the parents?
Singaporean parents do not in general send their kids for after hours schooling in sports. In fact they even choose schools and kindergartens based on how many hours of actual work is done at school rather than playtime and outdoor activities.
After a long day at school kids often have extra maths, English, Mandarin, science etc rarely sports. It starts here. If parents drive the motivation out of the kid to want to do well in sports and pack their time with extra in-class activities is it any wonder kids end up not being great at sport. Practice makes perfect, lack of practice makes you a banker.
Is it money?
Some Singaporeans, like many in Asia, are obsessed with money or more to the point the status symbols that it brings. I’m always being asked how much did I pay for this or that and how much did I make out of this or that. It’s a national sport. Measuring wealth. Hence the large $10-20million houses and extra half million costing cars for some of the smallest sized families in the world. The Chanel and LV handbags and luxury watches. Anything you can see.
Where’s the money in sport? None. Not unless you’re a Premier League star or NBA star. No athletics star in Asia and certainly not an Asian football star is going to become a millionaire anytime soon unless they move to the US/UK. There is just no value or perceived value here in that long term struggle and that journey versus that bag or that car or that house or jewellery now.
I don’t know the answer but I do think that there needs to be more of a focus on outdoor activities at school and recognition that sports like the arts are worthwhile careers to go into in Singapore. That needs a long term mindshift and cultural rethink. That takes time. One gold medal, soon to be forgotten, will not alter that. What do you think?
Educating students to their highest potential
8 年It seems to me that Singaporeans like the money trail. Maybe once they start seeing 'true gold' in those Olympic Awards they may become more interested in sports.
So many good points and comments. In short there are many many reasons! And having work on planning for some local sport infrastructures, there is clearly a very different way of looking at life in general and sport in particular compared to a more western culture. Singapore is a big city and a big city will develop people in a way very different way than in a small place in the middle of the country, say in Italy. Then success is also measured differently. That would be great putting together a forum to see how all of us could help turning things around. Most of the tools are around. Some of the points I would raise: - weakness / absence of local leagues / championships / tournaments across many sports. Why? How to remedy? - lack of local media coverage / media interest for local / regional activities. Why? How to fix it? - infrastructure: what is missing and why? How to make Kallang Stadium more relevant? How to make other venues access easier and better? - how to get a larger community involved in structured rather than ad-hoc and controlled events? - parents: how to meet their expectations or help them realign expectations? - highlight what really works as it is: our parks etc and how to make them better for leisure and sports? -parks are great but really, honestly, there is a lack of imagination and versatility) - SSC: what is really the direction and does that need adjustments? ....
Connecting Visionaries to Capital in Space & Medical Research with Collaborations from US & Singapore to the Globe | Editor of The Outcomes Magazine | AI-XR-Photonics Partnerships | Classic Car Lover
8 年Quite a thought provoking article. I would have to disregard the NS question because it implies that sports are for males. If we look at USA, more medals were won by female Athletes overall. I would like to say that in my experience working as an elite level Gymnastics coach here in Singapore and clinician for the governing body of sport, the fundamental reason I see is the lack of coaches education or sharing of information within coaches in a specific sport. The mindset here is that of "I hope my competitor messes up so I have the advantage." Instead of what I her up and preach to my Athletes..."if my Competiton is good, that will push me to train harder and become a better athlete."
I would fathom that it has to do with the traditional mindset either being inherited or being imbibed within a child by his/her parents, which channels their time and energy towards higher education and not sports. Insightful article as I wasn't aware this was the case in Singapore.
EAL Coordinator at AIS | English Teacher | English Coach | English Consultant | EAL Teacher | AI Specialist | Online English Coach
8 年I think sometimes the obsession with winning comes at the cost of developing players. For example, assuming the school chooses football as a CCA as they believe the school has a chance of winnin awards, there is pressure on the coaches to produce results (trophies/awards for the schools) otherwise the coaches will not be asked back the following year. In this situation, as a coach do you pick the physically developed guy who can dominate the game by running fast, using his strength and smacking the ball a long distance or the short guy who has not developed physically and gets pushed off the ball easily but has good technique? Then if the small guy doesn't get in the first 11 at school he doesn't get to play football as there is no second 11 team. All his potential is then wasted.