Why AI Regulations Must Prioritize Ethics and Humanity Over Profit: A Call for Global Standards"

As we push deeper into the era of artificial intelligence, recent events highlight an urgent need for coherent, enforceable AI regulations—both in the U.S. and globally—that genuinely prioritize the ethical considerations, safety, and humanity of AI development over profit. While American innovation thrives on disruption, it’s essential we disrupt with responsibility, particularly in this nascent and powerful field. The recent pivot from cautionary regulation to profitability, illustrated by statements from prominent AI figures, brings this issue into sharper focus. We owe thanks to the pioneers and ethical advocates, like Dr. Geoffrey Hinton, who have brought these concerns to light and continue to push for responsible AI.

The Drifting Focus on Profit: A Concerning Trend

AI pioneer Dr. Geoffrey Hinton, renowned for his transformative work in deep learning, recently resigned from Google, publicly stating his belief that AI presents significant dangers. Dr. Hinton’s warnings align with the sentiments of other leaders advocating for a tempered approach to AI—one that focuses on ethical implications, transparent oversight, and societal impact. Dr. Hinton expressed serious concerns about AI systems that may surpass human understanding and control, stating that these systems, if left unchecked, could destabilize societal structures and become increasingly difficult to govern.

However, there’s an evident shift among AI leaders toward a more profit-driven agenda, casting shadows over these ethical concerns. Leaders who once promoted a slower, more cautious approach are now aligning with venture-backed projects and profit-oriented companies, a pivot that threatens to overshadow the original calls for caution. This pivot risks sidelining a regulatory framework built on transparency, accountability, and safety in favor of rapid, unchecked development to meet investor demands. A genuine thanks is owed to those in the field who are speaking out, reminding us of the core values that should drive AI innovation.

A Disjointed Regulatory Landscape in the U.S.

In the U.S., AI regulations are, at best, fragmented and often inconsistent. California’s attempt to establish AI oversight is a start, but without a unified national framework, the patchwork approach leads to confusion and diluted enforcement. Presidential orders provide direction but lack the robustness needed to withstand the shifts in political winds or the complexities AI brings. We need more than polished, politically correct versions of governance that fail to address the real risks AI poses.

This disjointed approach contrasts sharply with the European Union’s regulatory efforts, which emphasize precautionary measures, accountability, and stringent compliance standards across its member states. Having spent significant time in Europe, I can attest to the EU’s firm commitment to AI ethics. It’s a model that demonstrates how governance can ensure innovation without compromising safety. And yet, a globally harmonized approach is still missing—a gap that we, as global influencers, have a duty to bridge. My thanks go out to those in the EU who continue to set an example and pave the way for a more aligned, responsible approach to AI governance.

The Essential Role of Risk Management in AI Governance

Drawing from over 20 years of experience in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), I see an opportunity—and an imperative—to apply a more mature risk management perspective to AI. The AI industry must adopt a framework similar to ERM principles, one that mandates continuous risk assessments, strict data privacy standards, and clear accountability structures to mitigate the far-reaching impacts of AI misuse. I’d like to extend my appreciation to all risk management professionals whose contributions in this area guide us toward stronger AI governance models.

Our regulatory framework should encompass the following pillars:

1. Transparent Accountability?– Every AI system needs a transparent chain of accountability. This means that both companies and stakeholders should have clear guidelines and an understanding of the potential implications of deploying specific AI models.
2. Prioritizing Ethical Design?– AI systems should be designed with a "human-first" approach that prioritizes safety, fairness, and inclusivity. This includes minimizing biases, ensuring explainability, and respecting data privacy.
3. Ongoing Audits and Monitoring?– AI systems should undergo continuous audits to detect deviations from expected behaviors, particularly in autonomous and generative AI models. This proactive approach aligns with ERM, where risk monitoring is a continuous process, not a one-time compliance exercise.
4. Global Alignment for Consistency?– Finally, we must strive for global consistency in AI governance. It’s vital to establish frameworks that encourage shared best practices across borders, enabling AI to flourish without exploiting vulnerable populations or sidestepping ethical considerations. I thank those who have championed these principles and demonstrated the value of a human-centered approach to AI.

A Call to Action: Building AI with Integrity and Responsibility

AI has the power to be transformative, but it also has the potential to exacerbate inequality, erode privacy, and even threaten human rights if left unchecked. Leaders, policymakers, and industry influencers must collaborate to create a stable regulatory framework that promotes ethical AI and fosters public trust. Heartfelt thanks to every individual in the AI community and beyond who advocates for these critical values and leads by example.

We cannot afford to let short-term profit motives shape the trajectory of AI. To move forward responsibly, we must heed the warnings of experts like Dr. Hinton and commit to developing AI systems that genuinely prioritize humanity. As influencers, we must advocate for transparency, ethics, and accountability. Only by doing so can we ensure that AI benefits society as a whole and protects those who are most vulnerable.

Conclusion: AI Regulation Is More Than Just Policy—It's a Commitment to Humanity

The call for AI regulation is a call to protect the very fabric of our society. As the U.S. strives to catch up with the EU in formulating cohesive AI governance, it’s essential that we don’t lose sight of the larger purpose behind regulation: to protect people. AI must advance, but it must do so in a way that respects and uplifts humanity. With deep gratitude to those who continue to push for a thoughtful, responsible approach, let’s move forward together to ensure AI builds a future we can all trust.

?