Why the 'AI Open Letter'? is a Good Thing. The Plot of the Marshmallow versus the Acorn.
Groucho Marx: “Why should I care about posterity? What has it ever done for me?”

Why the 'AI Open Letter' is a Good Thing. The Plot of the Marshmallow versus the Acorn.

The oak beams of Oxford story

During my studies one of my professors told me this story, that has made a great impression on me ever since:

I wanted to use this story to set the stage for this article, but during the fact finding phase, I found no evidence for this to be true. On the contrary, I found an article in the Guardian revealing the story to be a myth:

No alt text provided for this image
See: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2013/oct/02/david-cameron-oxford-college-trees-myth

Because I wanted the story so much to be true, I also checked ChatGPT, in order to find new leads that might lead to a confirmed source for the oak beams story, which in my memory was related to the Bodleian Library:

No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image

So, ChatGPT was fed the story also, and very specific details, that, however, could nowhere be confirmed as fact. And it is also a much heard lesson learned with regards to ChatGPT; it is parroting information that it was fed, no guarantees for any factual value.

The Marshmallow and the Acorn

The oak beams of Oxford story would have been a great intro to what philosopher Roman Krznaric coined as the tug of war in our minds between our short-term 'marshmallow brain' and our long-term 'acorn brain'.

No alt text provided for this image
Source: https://youtu.be/5QHqVF4aN6o

In his book "The Good Ancestor: How to Think Long Term in a Short-Term World", Roman Krznaric coins the marshmallow brain, inspired by the 1970 'marshmallow study' by Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029815. The study indicated that human kind is wired for short-termism; when placed in front of a marshmallow, and promised a second marshmallow, only if the first marshmallow is resisted for 15 minutes; instant gratification wins.

Another inclination in the human mind, and at the opposite side of the 'marshmallow brain' is the 'acorn brain', that focuses on long term thinking and planning. The Oak Beams of Oxford story would have been an example of the latter.

In a picture- from The Good Ancestor (pg 12):

No alt text provided for this image
From The Good Ancestor: How to Think Long Term in a Short-Term World by Roman Krznaric. Graphic design by Nigel Hawtin. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND.


The way to be a good ancestor, and build a world that is also good with 'seven generations from now' in mind, is to move away from short-termism, or the 'terror of the now', with the digital distraction (homo distractus) that we touched upon in an earlier post.

The legacy mindset, the cathedral thinking and the transcendent goal are rather different world perspectives, as Krznaric explains in his book, and also here:

It is also what motivated me to sign the AI Open Letter by Nathalie Smuha et al:

No alt text provided for this image
AI Open Letter

The 'Move fast and break things' strategy is short-termism behaviour, that may have a larger footprint than we realize, or than we are capable of understanding now. So, this is a plea for thinking long term, in a short-term world.

And the way to do this, is to implement 'privacy by design', a Trust Framework, and a proper governance; activities that ensure Daniel Kahneman's "slow" System 2 thinking: to consider long term effects, beyond the short-termism, and towards long term thinking.

No alt text provided for this image


#GoodAncestor #Marshmallow #Acorn

Klaus Heine

Professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam, Jean Monnet Chair, Co-Director Center of Excellence on Digital Governance

1 年

No worries with the role of time... Already the interest rate is equilibrating the value of waiting for society... But I fear the marshmallow experiment doesn't stand the yardstick of experimental design to be informative. What that means for AI, who knows? :-)

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Marlon Domingus ??的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了