Why AI Can't Replace the Value of Human Interaction in Language Learning
Sérgio Pantoja
Delta-qualified English teacher | Teacher educator | Speaking and Writing examiner | ELT author l Course designer | Language Development for Teachers and Exam Prep for Teachers | Delta Module 1 tutor
Teaching English for over 20 years, I'm a strong believer that the ability to engage in meaningful conversations and provide emotional support is (still) a crucial component of effective language instruction. While artificial intelligence has made great strides in recent years, it is still limited in its ability to replicate the complexities and nuances of human communication and social interactions.
I'm positive that most English teachers will agree that the ability to engage in authentic conversations with other human beings is a key factor in improving students' language skills. Not only do these conversations provide an opportunity for learners to practice their speaking and listening skills but also to learn about different cultures and different perspectives. Additionally, the emotional support and guidance provided by a teacher is, IMHO, a vital part of the learning process, helping learners to feel motivated and confident as they progress in their language journey.
Walsh (2006) argues that
"The role of the teacher is central to co-constructing a?dialogue in which learning opportunities are maximised?through the use of specific interactional strategies to? scaffold, shape and clarify learner contributions."
Language learning is not just about acquiring technical skills – it is also about developing cultural competence and an understanding of the social and emotional aspects of communication. A skilled language teacher can help learners navigate these complexities and become more confident and effective communicators.
While artificial intelligence may be able to help with certain language learning tasks, it is unlikely to fully replace the value of human interaction and emotional support in language instruction.?
Walsh, S. (2006) Investigating classroom discourse.
Especialista en lo obvio y irrefutable / idiot savant ?Fue algo que dije? Espero que sí. Mira atentamente: El diablo está en los detalles... ???? ?????? ??
2 年AI cannot replace human connection, it cannot see the anxiety in the eyes of a student, it is incapable of encouragement. Teachers are the guides across the bridges from ignorance to knowledge, understanding then wisdom. Irreplaceable.
English Instructor na Red Balloon Escola de Inglês, CNA, Vip in CLass
2 年AI can be a great resource to classes, but it will not replace teachers at all. In studies about vision recognition for example, AI can identify objects in a scene from a selected system, but when asked to identify on any other picture its "ability" decreases from 90% to 25%. And wehn talking about understanding the broad picture or visual elements that indicate emotion, context or even connection, it's only able to identify what is there, and not what is happening. So to have AI as a teacher, I think it will take some milennia.
Consultor at Insigna Consultoria para Recursos Humanos
2 年I tended to agree with you.... but then I came across apps such as Loora (iOS only), Elsa, and Falou App and my mind has changed. Even more so now that ChatGPT is out there, it's scary, but it's amazing at the same time!
Author, How to Write Inclusive Materials / AD International Programs, UofT
2 年Everything is always doom-reported to replace us.
Dyslexia in the ESL Classroom (Pl/Eng) method ? Creator. Integrated Language method ? Creator. Transforming Learning Challenges into Success Stories. Dyslexia and ADHD in the EFL Context.
2 年I cannot agree more. The same applies to translation.