Who's Going Back to the Office? Who *Should* Be Going Back?

It's usually not a simple choice - for companies or for individuals. If you're unsure who should go back to the office, how many days per week, and to do what type of work... here's a bit of help.

Companies and individuals are making a variety of choices

Many people are thinking about being back in the office and what post-pandemic work life looks like. They’re asking questions like "why do I need to be in the office??When do I need to be back in the office? Why aren’t we all back in the office?"

The answers seem as varied as the people asking them. We are hearing weekly what different companies are doing, and the decisions are far from consistent.?

• The largest 4-day work week pilot to date is underway?in the UK.?For six months, 3,300 people, in 70 companies, across a wide variety of industries are testing the feasibility of a 4-day work week.?During the program, workers receive 100% of their pay for working only 80% of their usual week, in exchange for promising to maintain 100% of their productivity.?Joe O’Connor, CEO of 4 Day Week Global says “More and more companies are recognizing that the new frontier for competition is quality of life, and that reduced-hour, productivity-focused working is the vehicle to give them that competitive edge,”?
• Elon Musk made news?because of a?leaked internal memo to Tesla workersin which he says “Anyone who wishes to do remote work must be in the office for a minimum (and I mean *minimum*) of 40 hours per week or depart Tesla… not a remote branch office unrelated to the job duties.’ His reasoning seems to be that by not being in the office at least 40-hours per week, you are “phoning it in.”
• Akamai went in the opposite direction.?Full disclosure - I've had the?privilege?of working with them several times.?They announced?that as of May 2022, 95% of their nearly 10,000 employees around the world have complete flexibility to decide whether they work at home, in the office, or both.?In making this decision, they analyzed all roles in the company against the same criteria, regardless of location, and determined 95% could be done with complete flexibility.?Flexibility has been part of their culture for years but never to this extent.?The analysis bolstered their belief that employees should decide what is best for them.?

So, who’s doing what???A Robin survey of?more than 10,000 offices?globally found that:

• Nearly?20 percent of American office workers are back one day a week
• About 10 percent are back two days a week
• Just five percent are back three days a week
• Even fewer are back four or five days a week
• More than 50 percent do not use the office consistently every week.

The idea of everyone needing to be in the office or at the same site goes back to the industrial and pre-digital work environment.?Materials were most efficiently used in a single location.?Communication happened face-to-face or by phone. In my early consulting career, I worked for a firm where a large percentage of the consultants coded all day – onsite, in person.?The technology was different then so there really wasn’t another option.?However, these people spent 90% of their time in their cubes, working individually.?With today’s digital environments, you could easily see that being in-person would probably be of little impact on their work.

Recent research finds that working collaboratively face-to-face (F2F) has an impact on creativity.?A study of nearly 1,500 engineers in five different countries were randomly paired to create product ideas F2F or via video call. The?study showed video conferencing had a negative impact on idea generation but did not make a difference in the ability to critically evaluate creative ideas.?Since creativity begins with new or adaptive ideas, face-to-face could be critical to your innovation and problem-solving strategies.

What’s the right model for how we work??Individual companies will have different needs, each job will have different needs, and people will have different needs. That's a new way of thinking.??Many roles are much more nuanced than the coder example I shared above, so the choice is not that simple. It will take months, probably years before we understand the benefits and drawbacks of any model.?At the end of the day, the answer will probably be,?it depends.

"It depends" is not a great response for people seeking answers.??So, here’s a little help figuring things out.?If you and your team are still deciding how to manage the Great Transition, you may want to start with looking at the nature of the work.?Even if your organization is committed to a consistent hybrid model (i.e., everyone in the office 2 days per week), it may help you determine how to use those in-office days vs remote days.?

You can start with a?simple 2x3 matrix?that allows you to map tasks to three task categories – creative, analytical, or transactional/process -- and the degree of interactivity associated with the task – is it primarily individual or collaborative, and the amount of your time you spend on each task.?For example, if I am analyzing the data in a spreadsheet, it is primarily an individual task.?If I am one of several people brainstorming a new solution, working collaboratively on this analysis will generate better results.?Analyzing different solutions may work as well remotely as FTF depending on the nature of what’s being analyzed.??Also, creative and analytical processes can be co-dependent and concurrent, so working collaboratively, FTF on this analysis might generate better results. Think of this as a continuum between Creative and Transactional. Here's an example, below:

We’re working with leaders, teams and organizations right now helping them be successful in the new world of work through customizable programs and consulting engagements.??How can we help you?