Who is worried about Scotland's new Hate Crime law, and why?
Jamie Wareham
QueerAF Founder, Forbes Under 30 2020 | I help you understand the LGBTQIA+ news and support queer creatives
Welcome to the weekly QueerAF Explainer, from me, Jamie Wareham.
Every Tuesday, we'll publish a succinct, easy-to-read article on one of the week's biggest LGBTQIA+ stories first published in our award-winning newsletter.
You'll leave with a valuable analysis to help you understand what it could mean for your work, business, and career - right here on LinkedIn.
Let's get into this week's edition.
TL;DR: New hate crime legislation in Scotland, due to come into force on April 1st, will make it an offence to stir up hatred on grounds of sexual orientation, transgender identity, age or disability. The majority of people and media speaking against it are, well, voices who stir up hatred.
An extension of the law in Scotland will make it a hate crime offence to "stir up hatred" towards all protected characteristics within the Equality Act.
Right-wing media and a series of anti-trans voices have lined up to express their opposition to it, leading to Scotland's first minister calling out the "disinformation" being spread about what the law will mean - Sky News
The law itself isn't setting a new precedent. It mirrors a similar offence about race hatred already on the statute book and consolidates other hate crime regulations. But this move has led to questions from those who are concerned about what it means for 'free speech.'
Proponents of the bill say it limits hate speech - not free speech.
What's in The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act?
The law was passed by MSPs in 2021 and comes into force on April 1st.
It will criminalise threatening or abusive behaviour which is intended to stir up hatred based on certain characteristics, including age, disability, sexual orientation and transgender identity - BBC
The law, however, includes a clause that would allow those taken to court under the Act to offer proof that their behaviour or communication was reasonable in the circumstances, as part of their defence. This allows for a number of exemptions on the grounds of freedom of speech, including for example around comedy and fiction.
As Adam Tomkins, The John Millar Professor of Public Law at the University of Glasgow, explained to The Herald:
"Offensive speech is not criminalised by this legislation: the only speech relating to sexual orientation, transgender identity, age or disability outlawed here is speech which (1) a reasonable person (2) would consider to be threatening or abusive and which (3) was intended to stir up hatred and (4) was not reasonable in the circumstances."
Who opposes the Scotland Hate Crime Bill?
Media like The Telegraph, Spiked and Unherd have published a series of articles claiming "Scotland is no longer a free country" following now denied claims that the law will target performers - STV
Billionaires like JK Rowling and Elon Musk have also been speaking out, with the author calling it "ludicrous" - The National
领英推荐
Gender-critical campaigners claimed Police Scotland's planning for new hate crime laws parodied the author in a training scenario about an influencer called 'Jo' who posted that all transgender people "belong in gas chambers" - The Telegraph
Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross was also worried for the author and said police could be "swamped" and innocent people would be investigated. "People like JK Rowling could have police at their door every day for making perfectly reasonable statements," he said in Parliament. The First Minister Humza Yousaf countered that freedom of speech was protected, and the problem was hate crime itself, not the law - BBC
Analysis: There's a reason they're worried about being criminalised
The prominent anti-trans voices we hear so much from don't just have private discriminatory beliefs about transgender people. They use their large platforms to stir up hate about transgender people in order to push their hateful agenda.
If they continue, this action could well see them fall foul of this law in Scotland.?
This bill does nothing more than extend protections against racist crimes to other protected characteristics, and it's telling that the usual chorus of anti-trans voices has lined up to call it out.
For these campaigners, the same rules, morals and ethics are fine and dandy when applied to racism and often even homophobia - until they are applied to transphobia as well.
What does this mean for your work, career and business?
This may well become the current running theme here, but as a high-profile employment tribunal takes place in the UK based on a teacher's actions towards a trans student takes place - it's a prominent consideration.
Beliefs are protected in law. Being protected from discrimination is too.
Freedom of speech is a concept we all understand, as is freedom of expression. But our society is drawing lines around hate speech because it leads to a reduction of freedom of speech and expression by stirring up hate, prejudice and misinformation about, usually, marginalised communities.
We can all respectfully disagree - but there is a difference between that, and creating actions which spread hate. In the workplace, we can all take this forward as a state of mind we come back to, in even the smallest interactions.
Want to understand even more LGBTQIA+ news?
This article was first published in QueerAF, a free weekly newsletter for LGBTQIA+ people who want to understand the LGBTQIA+ ????? news without doom scrolling for quality queer content ?
Every Saturday, we explain the biggest LGBTQIA+?? headlines, share the latest queer content everyone is talking about and a different underrepresented writer shares their unique queer gaze.
2700+ people trust us to give them everything they need each week to navigate and understand the ever-changing queer world ?????
Student at Saxion University of Applied Sciences , Engineer Software
10 个月The passage of this law means that Humza Yousaf and those who voted for this law must themselves be brought to justice. What they did is a crime against humanity, if the new law contradicts the fundamental human right, freedom of speech, enshrined in the constitution, then people should not obey it.
Quality & Compliance Specialist Consultant & CEO of: Effective Policy & Compliance, Learn Easy, and Smart Compliance Systems. A2B Plan Management A2B Home & Personal Care
11 个月How very 1984. Just backward.
Director of Strategic Inclusion, Ogilvy UK | NED, Outvertising | British LGBT Awards 2024 Top-12 Trailblazer | STRETCH List 2024 Awardee | Inclusive Brand Consultant | Speaker & Thought Leader | Proud British Filipino
11 个月Thank you for this Jamie Wareham. I think this is a great proposal to codify in law as current discrimination laws under the Equality Act fall short. Particularly when it comes to anti-trans voices dressing up their discrimination as open journalistic enquiry and “just an expression of beliefs”. You may well have the right to believe whatever you believe, but to act on those beliefs to stir up hatred is an infringement on our basic humans rights. Having recently been on the receiving end of online bullying from anti-trans campaigners, I’d feel safer under these proposed changes to Scottish law and wish they’d be considered for England too.