Who are we transitioning for?

Who are we transitioning for?

Co-authored by Michael Hayes, Global Climate and Renewables Leader, KPMG, and Avery Johnstone, Associate, Global Decarbonization Hub & Global Chair, Leaders 2050.

Suppose we transition to net zero, and we don’t do so in a just way (e.g. Including, but not limited to, Indigenous engagement, gender inclusion, labour rights, equitable energy access, etc.). In that case, the question begs, who are we transitioning for??

It is well established that climate change impacts the world’s most vulnerable more than any other part of society. The World Bank reports that certain social groups, including women, children, persons with disabilities, Indigenous peoples, and migrant workers, amongst others, are particularly vulnerable to crises and, often, compounding crises. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has highlighted the need for climate solutions that conform to procedural and distributive justice principles for more effective development outcomes. Governments, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, recognise this by designing policies to address it. So, what about the business world?

We often hear critiques of just transition work based on speed or priority – that solving environmental issues will inherently solve social issues (e.g. Forced migration, famine, geopolitical tensions) and we must tackle the environment first. But, knowing what we do about the challenges to speed and scale climate action and net zero, are we willing to wait another 26 years (or, in a pessimistic view, even longer) even to consider the people who will continue to live on this planet? The challenge and opportunity of this transition is a systems-level change - do we want to risk creating yet another system of structural inequality?

The climate crisis is about people. So, too, is the energy transition. Social and environmental impact are inextricably linked and inseparable to solve. An energy transition, let alone just one, will not happen without the mass mobilisation of people and capital towards a new way of thinking, working, and living. And it is well underway, for example:

  1. We are in the midst (though in the early stages) of scaling renewables.
  2. The US has embedded climate justice into its Inflation Reduction Act legislation, establishing a federal government-wide goal that 40 per cent of the overall benefits of certain Federal investments flow to disadvantaged communities that are marginalised, underserved, and overburdened by pollution.
  3. Young people are leaving or turning down offers of employment at companies that no longer align with their values.

The just transition is happening, and the business needs to get on board to mitigate incoming risks and benefit from the prospective opportunities.

There is an economic and moral imperative to address environmental and social issues in a nexus – not least because one accelerates action with the other, and time is not on our side here. Some statistics to support this:

  • The phase-out of coal alone could lead to the loss of 12 million fossil fuel jobs, a shift that poses challenges for affected workers, communities, businesses operating those assets and investors counting on the returns (Source: IRENA, 2020a)
  • Companies with more female board directors are 21 per cent more likely to have set emission reduction targets. (Source: World Economic Forum, from UNEP and World Bank)
  • Investing in gender equality could reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by up to 15% by 2050. (Source: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Bank)

To treble renewable energy, embedding social impact assessments are just as important as the planning permissions or grid access. It should be the license to operate. Affordable and clean energy is only one of the 17 SDGs – alongside climate action – but will only be possible by co-achieving several if not all, of the others (including quality education, decent work and economic growth, gender equality, responsible consumption and production, and most importantly, partnership for the goals).

We have a long road ahead of us and significant goals to reach to ensure the sustainability of our planet. It will be a journey that we cannot leave anyone behind. We risk complete systems failure if we do not include holistic and intersectional perspectives and action in this transition.

Bottom Line: The private sector will be at risk if it does not take action now. Businesses have a duty and responsibility to their communities and our planet. If a climate investment is not just, it is redundant and detrimental to the future inheritors of our Earth. We must call for just transition action and investments exclusively moving forward.


Co-authored by Michael Hayes, Global Climate and Renewables Leader, KPMG, and Avery Johnstone, Associate, Global Decarbonization Hub & Global Chair, Leaders 2050.


Urooj Khan

ESG Assurance Lead & Audit Director at KPMG LG| ACCA Global Council Member

1 年

Really valid points Michael Hayes. Achieving net zero is not just about checking the box but its about making a deeper and long term just impact. Focusing on E of ESG by corporates shouldnt make them sideline the S of ESG. A great qoute by Sharron Burrow - “We all need to work together, because there are no jobs on a dead planet; there is no equity without rights to decent work and social protection, no social justice without a shift in governance and ambition, and, ultimately, no peace for the peoples of the world without the guarantees of sustainability.” #socialimpact #kpmgesg

回复
Shradha Pant

People & Change Advisory | Workforce Transformation |Sustainable Business Transformation

1 年

Absolutely crucial point raised - A 'just transition' is not only about achieving net zero but addressing community challenges and ensuring inclusivity and equity in the entire process. Embedding this concept into core transition strategies is imperative, and now is the time to act with urgency and empathy for a more equitable and sustainable future. #SocialImpact #Sustainability #EnvironmentalJustice #SDGs

???? Nishant Sengupta ??

Business Professional || Promoting Sustainable Engineering on Industrial scale to create impact, || B.Tech, M.Tech, MBA, AMIE, CEng.

1 年

It is said the one who truely understands a value of life will plant a tree, knowing well that they will not be the one who sits in its shade but the next generation.

Chaitali Ganguly

CapGemini Talent and Transformation | Trekking | Ex KPMG

1 年

Extremely cogent arguments. Any transition needs to be a just transition or we will find ourselves at a crossroads of similar kind a few years / decades later. The social transition has to be in tandem with the move to net zero.

Silvia Gonzalez-Zamora

Global Social Sustainability Leader, National DEI Practice Leader, Partner at KPMG

1 年

Well said Michael and Avery!! ?? the transition has to be Just- fair considering Justice, Just- simple and without hidden agendas, Just- precise and thorough and Just- timely, like now, to achieve a full transition for all !!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Michael Hayes的更多文章