Who Should Acquire Avaya?

Who Should Acquire Avaya?

Following the receipt of “expressions of interest,” Avaya has engaged J.P. Morgan to assist in exploring alternatives intended to maximize shareholder value. This is likely to do with speculation that Mitel offered to acquire Avaya. Putting price aside, the reaction to the idea of the two companies combining was mixed.

I find the combination both intriguing and concerning. Mitel certainly knows how to acquire businesses. That's not a trivial credential as most companies are terrible at it. NEC has more or less given up at trying, and Avaya itself doesn't have a stellar record. Some companies have a disciplined process that seems to work… Mitel, Cisco, Vonage, and West come to mind.

The problem is that Avaya is a much bigger fish than any of the companies Mitel has caught. Mitel has acquired companies of equal and smaller sizes with ease. These include Aastra, Prairie Fyre, Toshiba’s UC systems business, and ShoreTel. It literally swallowed them up and spit out the bones. That's not going to work with Avaya.

Mitel has a history of chasing after undervalued companies. Avaya shareholders agreeing to sell to Mitel would feel a bit like the dog catching the car. Now what?

Based on Mitel’s previous pattern, it would strip away redundancies, consolidate the portfolios, and eliminate most of Avaya's managers. None of these would be simple with Avaya. Also, unlike previous acquisitions, Mitel would have to reposition itself as a small business to enterprise vendor, and that's a tall order that few companies have accomplished. 

It got me wondering if there’s a better fit. If Avaya is truly undervalued, who should acquire it? Here's my list:

Hewlett Packard Enterprise -- Avaya and HPE have a long history of services and joint go-to-market. The two companies have common customers and competitors.

Salesforce -- It's been expected for some time that Salesforce may become a contact center provider. It might seem more logical that Salesforce would acquire a CCaaS provider, but why should a cloud innovator pay a cloud premium? The combination could be complementary. Avaya could teach Salesforce about communications and contact center in exchange for lessons on becoming a cloud provider.

Microsoft -- It's shocking that Microsoft doesn't have a contact center play. It has UCaaS, CRM, calendaring, video, team collaboration, and more... but it will never own the enterprise communications stack without a contact center. Avaya OneCloud could be optimized for Azure. The endpoint hardware line could benefit Microsoft Teams users.

Oracle -- Here's a company that knows how to acquire. Oracle acquired seven companies last year, and about 90 in the past 10 years. Related acquisitions that fit with Avaya include Acme Packet, Talari Networks, NetSuite (CRM), Micros Systems (hospitality), Responsys (email marketing), among many more.

RingCentral -- RingCentral has a market cap about six times greater than Avaya’s. It could acquire Avaya and build a migration path for customers that want cloud. The revenue premium for cloud makes a migration path well worth the cost of getting into a premises-based business. RingCentral actually just recently expanded its premises-based solutions, with its Persist product. RingCentral would also be able to bolster its contact center and video capabilities and have a differentiated line of endpoints. 

I like the potential of these combinations, but I don’t think any are actually very likely. That brings us back to Mitel, which deserves credit for bold thinking. On the other hand, maybe Avaya should remain independent. Its revenue declines and customer losses aren’t problematic if it results in a more nimble, enterprise communications-focused company.

This post was originally published on No Jitter.

 

How's the MC Hammer song go?? "You can't touch this.."??https://youtu.be/otCpCn0l4Wo

回复
Lawrence Byrd

Communications APIs at Vonage

5 年

The problem here, as you know Dave, is that Avaya's whole portfolio is immensely complicated with multiple overlapping products in all dimensions (many from previous complex acquisitions). Capturing this checkerboard "base" is very difficult and not even Avaya has done a great job in migrating the long tail "base". Why does anyone else want this headache? Versus just targeting the "base" directly with their own products, as Microsoft and Cisco have been doing aggressively now for a decade, even before the onrush of many new simpler and better integrated cloud alternatives. This comment was originally published on No Jitter :).

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dave Michels的更多文章

  • Navigating the Algorithmic Age: Why 'Nexus' is a Must-Read

    Navigating the Algorithmic Age: Why 'Nexus' is a Must-Read

    Yuval Noah Harari’s “Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI,” is not just another…

  • SP Voice is the New Old Thing

    SP Voice is the New Old Thing

    Enterprise Comms has a way of re-inventing itself. New technologies sometimes cause us to reconsider long-held…

    24 条评论
  • Bridging Innovation Live Stream w/ Chris

    Bridging Innovation Live Stream w/ Chris

    The reason kids want careers in fire, police, medicine, and space when they grow up is because that’s all they know. If…

    1 条评论
  • Return of the Td

    Return of the Td

    ujI rarely write about analyst events. These events have multiple purposes but are primarily designed to educate…

    1 条评论
  • A New Fisker Journey Begins

    A New Fisker Journey Begins

    Several have asked for a Fisker update. I’ve hesitated to provide one because the situation kept changing, but now is a…

    22 条评论
  • The Power of Voice

    The Power of Voice

    As communications professionals, we know digital channels have many benefits over voice. They enable superior…

  • Fisker Needs Cash!

    Fisker Needs Cash!

    At a recent conference in Orlando, many people said AI dominated conversations. My experience was different.

    9 条评论
  • Thoughts on Fisker Nissan

    Thoughts on Fisker Nissan

    An interesting few days. Fisker reported its 4Q, and the numbers were ugly - that's three quarters of misses that…

    1 条评论
  • Fisker Ocean: The Good, Bad, and Ugly

    Fisker Ocean: The Good, Bad, and Ugly

    It’s time to share my thoughts on the Fisker Ocean One. I received the car in December.

    12 条评论
  • My EV Doesn't Use Gasoline

    My EV Doesn't Use Gasoline

    I’ve had the Fisker Ocean One for about a month now. It’s a great conversation starter.

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了