Who says Cash on Delivery sucks? Ask Dominos India!
Alok Kejriwal
Disney bought my last Company! CEO of Games2win. I'm a passionate digital entrepreneur with a love for Mobile Gaming & Product! Penguin published author of best-selling books “Why I stopped wearing my socks”,"The Cave".
Over the past few years, I have been reading the horror stories about how the cash on delivery (COD) model of payment touted by the e-commerce companies in India is the root of all their troubles and which costs them crores of Rupees to manage.
The problem? People order and don't pay up. Goods go back and its a mess. There are reports that in places like Noida (UP), kids order Televisions for 'fun' and then giggle when the goods come home!
But the experience of Domino’s Pizza in India shows why this line of argument is all wrong!
To prove that COD has worked for decades now, I analysed the 2011 balance sheet of the publicly listed company that operates Dominos India and was amazed to note some jaw dropping statistics.
- This company shipped about 3.7 crore pizzas in the year, equaling to 1 lakh pizzas sold per day.
- The pizzas sold for a total of Rs 600 crore, translating into an average price of Rs 162 per pizza.
- The business operated via 380 stores in 90 cities; that is, approximately four stores per city.
- Each store sold approximately 1 lakh pizzas a year or about 300 pizzas a day. That’s about 25 pizzas an hour.
- The company recorded a net profit of Rs 90 crore. This equals to Rs 25 per pizza or a 15 per cent margin on the sale price.
Isn't his is awesome, considering that this business is entirely managed as a cash-on-delivery business (eat-in as a % of sales was negligible). Also, if you review the size and scale of the operations they have, it resembles any gigantic e-commerce business.
So how can anyone blame cash on delivery as the culprit that ruined a business?
Actually, the pizza business in India teaches five important lessons to those who intend to execute the cash on delivery business model.
1. Cash is guaranteed when collected from home:
No one can run away from home. There is a Marwari saying that “If you run away with my money, I will come to your house to collect it.”
Imagine people giving you their home addresses to deliver and collect money. Can you get any more upfront? I doubt if anyone would like to rescind on a pre-placed order and kick up a fight in front of their neighbours over a small amount.
Lesson: getting called home is an assurance of getting paid. Leverage it.
2. Personal sales provide the best reference check:
In the weary world of business, people are unreliable. Companies are even worse. Who can fight a big legal battle with corporations whose karma has clogged up the Mithi river (a river in Mumbai that infamously gets clogged and
causes floods)?
Now cash on delivery is a foolproof method of establishing creditworthiness.
Once your name and home address is in the system, the seller quickly establishes if you have ever defaulted on your payment. If you have played truant, then you will not be supplied the pizza or the shoe you ordered. That’s too bad because it’s not easy to change your name or the place you live in at the drop of a hat.
Lesson: use cash on delivery as a means to establish creditworthiness. And when the market is ready, cross-sell that creditworthiness across business verticals so that it becomes a win-win.
3. Use cash on delivery to check ‘Intent’:
Consider the pizza sales again:
If 3.7 crore pizzas were sold just by one company, it’s very generous to say that at least 2 crore unique households in India bought a pizza (2 million crore x 2 pizzas = 4 crore pizzas per year).
Now, those who buy pizza in India are typically e-shoppers.
The numbers state that e-shoppers represent about 1 crore in India. And this is the same affluent, upwardly mobile community that can afford pizzas and printers delivered at their doorstep.
So while none of these households return a pizza that has been ordered, why do a staggering 45 per cent (according to a recent media report) of the same set of households refuse to take delivery of online goods purchased, when the courier reaches them?
If you do not return one out of two pizzas you buy, why would you return one out of two books you have e-ordered?
Lesson: New businesses using the cash on delivery model may want to collect small token amounts in advance to check ‘the intent’ of these happy-to-reject customers to ensure they pay up.
4. The 30-minute curfew works for pizzas, not for books:
If I am hungry and want to eat, it makes sense to promise me a pizza in 30 minutes or a free pizza if the deadline is not met.
But I ask, what is the urgency to ship a book with the same demonic speed while executing a book delivery? Will it matter if the book reaches me in a few days and not minutes? And hey, if I am so ‘hungry’ to read my newly ordered book, then ask me to pay double the regular charges for ‘instant delivery!
Lesson: New businesses relying on cash on delivery need to step back and ask themselves if they can spend less money on speedy delivery.
5. Cross-sell and cross-sell like crazy:
I am sure at one time or the other, we have indulged ourselves with those sinful garlic bread sticks and dipped them in that irresistible co-conspirator, the ‘cheesy dip’ that comes along. Coke and pizza get along famously and hence ordering a bottle of coke is logical when you order a pizza.
Another example. Haven’t we all seen those mini shampoo and moisturiser sachets embedded in women’s magazines? Or that perfume strip we carefully peel off and inhale as if it was pure ozone?
The point is that with every package delivered to someone’s house, there is a great opportunity to cross-sell domestic products which the same set of consumers could be encouraged and let me add, delighted to sample.
In the case of e-commerce companies, this is not a goldmine kind of opportunity; it’s a veritable diamond mine. Cross-selling and delivering samples do not cost anything extra in deliveries (the same courier boy achieves both jobs); rather it can easily change the fortunes of the fledgling e-commerce companies who say they lose money when they execute cash on delivery!
Given the myriad kinds of goods e-commerce companies ship out (books, electronics and home appliances), even a failed direct marketing student can build a simple ‘ASL’ or age–sex–location business model offering outside brands to ride on the e-commerce deliveries headed to consumers.
For example, if a microwave is headed for Mrs Sharma in Noida, the package can surely contain packs of free popcorn and ready-to-drink soups sponsored by other brands that would happily pay to reach their target audience directly.
Let me add, Mrs Sharma will bless you.
This is why desserts and appetisers bundled with pizza deliveries work so well.
Lesson: allow partner brands to piggyback on the cash on delivery transaction. Extract money from them for home delivering to their target audiences. Even cross-sell that extra as a surprise for the buyers.
Cash on delivery must be examined as a business opportunity rather than a titanic blunder. There are very few businesses in the world that actually invite brands and companies within the sacred portals of their homes. Leveraging what is not easy but can be highly profitable.
So if you want to master the cash on delivery model for your business, then maybe you should start by getting onto a pizza diet.
Originally written by me for Business Standard Newspaper
*****
Alok Kejriwal is a digital entrepreneur, based in Mumbai. He currently runs Games2win as his fourth startup and is the founder of therodinhoods.com - India's only social network for entrepreneurs. Connect with Alok on Twitter @rodinhood , Facebook and add him to your circle on Google+
*******
Co-Founder of a unique CFaaS company | DNA of a Marketer | Specialist in Cloud, Logistics, FSI
9 年I always enjoy reading your articles Alok...this too was a good one but I was expecting a few more points which are crucial in a failed COD in e-commerce. The article started with how Noida kids ordering televisions for fun. In this context, the comparison between pizza and e-comm is good but needs more justification for e.g. The value of pizza is quite small as comparison to buying a TV. Dad's of these kids won't mind shelling money once in a while for fun/fake ordered to pizza's but they can't do the same with a TV!! The good point while ordering pizza is they always at the end of taking order repeat your order and confirm address for delivery (a final and one tone confirmation), but I haven't seen such confirmations even for bigger order by e-commerce companies. Once ordered, they initiate the shipping process, won't it be a bit logical for them to call the customer with a thanks and confirm the order? I definitely believe COD has changed the way we shop online but adding a more human touch for confirmation, I don't think will be a problem. Your cross-selling is indeed a great idea, in fact I'm thinking e-commerce companies can make it a full fledged revenue vertical by introducing it as ad/ cross selling space for companies with relevant products and reach out to direct customers; new flavored instant popcorn with microwave delivery, special discount coupons for the crocs purchase to match the t-shirt getting delivered, a free eye specialist appointment from offline world with RayBan glasses bought online and what not!! Keep posting!
Winner 40 under 40 Business World I Winner Economic Times Top Retail minds I Head - Real Estate & Business Development I Raymond I loved working with - Domino’s, Starbucks, KFC, Popeyes, Dunkin, Chaayos, Hongs kitchen
9 年Domino's has been the pioneers in Food business for delivery and no one does it better than them...at a COD model, this is super stuff !
Product Leader @ Coupang | Ex- Amazon, BCG, P&G
9 年Well written article, the analysis is interesting and so are the inferences. However, you are missing a few important points here… 1. No, eCommerce doesn't consider COD as the root of all troubles. COD has opened up possibilities like never before. It drives majority of eCommerce spends and has literally exploded the market. Majority trials happen over COD and so people get recruited to the category 2. Comparison of Dominos and eCommerce players isn't that appropriate. These folks are delivering to 3000+ cities and towns with dependency on multiple carriers, v/s the 90 cities Dominos is operating in … that too delivering through their own boys having a company scooter/bike. No offense to anyone, but imagine dominos delivering in notorious areas of Eastern UP and you'll get what I'm trying to say. The dynamics are different! 3. Yes, there is a need for quicker delivery…if we look at what eCommerce players are competing against. If the nearby mom & pop store can deliver products in 15 mins, it is the competition in many ways. Products with lower shipment SLAs get much higher conversions, validates how much customers value faster delivery 4. Collecting small token amounts in advance would defeat the purpose of COD. While you are right in saying that one could check intent, what about Mrs Sharma who doesn’t know how to pay online at all? A big growth driver for eCommerce is customers who are just going online and aren’t comfortable with online payments yet. So my point is that “COD is challenging”, lets not trivialize it. But its so important for eCommerce that it cannot be ignored. And yes, the comparison is probably not the best one!
Marketing-Communication-Brand Advisor, Entrepreneur, Mentor, Visiting Faculty. Ex-Advisor-Indicus Analytics, Ex-Founder-JuxtConsult
9 年Alok, in 2011 Domino's was already doing COD for over a decade at the least (probably over 15 years maybe). Please give the e-com guys also some years and they would also master the art and science of it. Am sure Domino's would have also faced a lot of unpaid/uncollected returns in the initial years. In fact, if I recall correctly, they had to stop the 20-25 minutes delivery or free pizza initiative for some time (till they got their delivery distance and time logistics right). They also closed almost half their outlets in Delhi in the first few years because they got their locations all wrong. Moral of the story - mistakes and time were the best teachers for Domino's, so shall they be for the e-com guys.:) Sanjay Tiwari
Major Appliance Repair Owner & Technician
9 年According to Wikipedia, a crore is 10,000,000 and a lakh is 100,000.