Who Planned WWII and Why

Introduction

All wars since the Species War have had a few common purposes: eliminate surplus population, capture resources, colonies, and markets, capture women, and proliferate one’s own genes. WWI was a typical imperialist war motivated by all of these purposes. All of the belligerent nations were involved in secret treaty agreements and intent upon benefiting from the destruction of competitor states. Lenin proved this when, after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, he published numerous secret treaties from the Czar’s archives.

But WWII was different from others in that it had a very special purpose, and the people intending to benefit from that purpose planned it very well.

You heard me right. I shall prove to you that WWII, a war that took 60-85 million lives and was by far the greatest crime of the Second Millennium, was planned. The Russian people have known this since their leaders started telling them to prepare for it.

As early as September of 1917, on the eve of the October Revolution and during the imperialist war, in his pamphlet?The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It;?Lenin said:

"The result of the revolution has been that the?political?system of Russia has in a few months caught up with that of the advanced countries. But that is not enough. The war is inexorable (H inevitable); it puts [forth] the alternative with ruthless severity: either perish, or overtake and outstrip the advanced countries?economically as well. . ..?Perish or drive full-steam ahead. That is the alternative with which history has confronted us." (Collected Works of Lenin, Vol. XXI, p. 191)

In an attempt to crush the first socialist state, fifteen, 15, imperialist countries intervened in the Russian civil war that followed the October Revolution.

Stalin repeated Lenin’s message many times. He knew they had to transform Russia from what was largely a peasant country into a modern and mighty industrial power – and to do so quickly – in order to win the coming WWII.

As imperialist theft and super-exploitation of other peoples was NOT an alternative for financing socialist industrialization, Russia’s peasants would have to shoulder the cost. They had to be forced to collectivize, mechanize, and donate their surpluses to support the initially-unproductive city workers while the workers learned technology and basic industrial skills. The Communist parties of other countries, around the world, were organized and focused upon the tasks necessary to help the first socialist country survive and thrive. (See, for example, Stalin’s speech on the Sixth Congress of the Comintern [Communist International].)

Meanwhile, in the interim between the two world wars, the imperialist countries, led by the US and the UK, were doing just the opposite. They were working to harness the whole of the western world for the task of crushing the first socialist state in Russia. They were everywhere abridging or eliminating civil liberties and persecuting communists so as to unite their peoples for the destruction of the Russian, first socialist state, the Soviet Union.

Spain, Italy and Germany were geographically close to Russia, had relatively weak imperialist ruling classes and powerful communist parties. They had to be secured first with overtly fascist governments. Germany had to be the military spearhead, not only because of its industrial and scientific prowess, but also because anger is an essential component for war.

The German people were rightfully furious owing to the post-WWI Versailles Treaty that had been forced upon them. Excuse my vulgarity but no other expression suffices to describe what happened: Germany was gang-banged.

The intent of the Versailles Treaty was to roll back German history and revert what had been rapidly developing into the world’s science, technology and industry leader into a nation of small farmers. The Versailles Treaty forbade Germany to have a navy or an air force. Their army was limited to 100,000 men. Their industrial Ruhr Valley was occupied by French and Belgian troops. Worst of all, Germany was hypocritically held to blame for the whole of WWI! Germany was forced to make ruinous “reparations payments” to France and Britain. These were actually loan repayments that only passed through France and Britain enroute to their creditor for war supplies and loans – the United States of America. As these vicious conditions were being forced upon Germany, Wilson, the American president in attendance, acted out the role of liberal peacemaker and architect of the League of Nations (the post-WWI precursor of the United Nations Organization).

The Weimar Government, also established in Germany as a result of the Versailles Treaty, could only print the money needed for the “reparations payments.” This caused the worst inflation the world has ever seen. As of 1923, the Mark inflated to about one billionth of its mid-1918 value. It became impossible for German industry to operate and for average Germans to eat without charitable assistance.

Germany led the closures of business and industry that, like toppling dominoes, resulted in the Great Depression. As Marx revealed, business cycles are endemic to capitalist productive relations, but this was a depression like no other. Rich Anglo-Americans were able to buy-up and corrupt any and every desperate German and their property.

All this is the context in which WWII must be understood. But before I prove to you that the elite capitalists of the US and the UK planned WWII by proving to you that Adolph Schicklegruber (Hitler) was, in fact, their employee; it is necessary to issue a few concessions and impart to you a general history of the ideology (systematic thinking) regarding the class struggle. I don’t want this essay to be the converse of a Versailles Treaty. ?I don’t want to hypocritically throw all the blame for WWII on anyone.

The History of Class Struggle Ideology

The first popular conception of the class struggle, the fundamental struggle of opposites within society that tends to set everything else in motion, was issued by Franscis Galton. Galton was Darwin’s cousin and, ultimately, a “Knight of the British Empire.” His 1859 book, “Fingerprints” described the workers as genetically inferior. They deserve no sympathy or assistance, argued Galton, because their genes determine their place in society – on the bottom. (Nowadays, those who inherit wealth generally prefer alienation to guilt and convince themselves that they have a superior genetic endowment too. This is just a restatement of Social Darwinism, albeit with a positive spin.)

The antithesis returned the insult in full measure. Karl Marx, the ideological father of communism, issued it. The class struggle, said Marx, is between proletarians, people who have lost all means of production, and the capitalists whose profits are the stolen surplus value of the proletarians. According to Marx, human labor power was the source of all value, and capitalists were just parasites, the source of all the world’s problems. Socialist revolutions, led by the proletariat, would dispense with the capitalists and usher in communism, a workers’ paradise.

Never mind the fact that other species of animals and plants (our distant relatives) produce products that we value and need. Never mind the fact that almost all businesses and industries are founded by frugal, insightful, and industrious entrepreneurs. Never mind the fact that not all capitalists resemble Oblomov landlords living on rent or Manhattan trust-fund babies passively cashing dividends. Never mind the fact that all good managers must learn to think and behave like capitalists, must minimize costs, enforce discipline in the workplace and make wise and insightful investment, purchasing and production decisions. Never mind the fact that few if any of us have been forced to bring our children (not society’s children) into an already-over-crowded world.

For all of these reasons, Marx’s flawed and over-simplified definition of the class struggle failed disastrously whenever it was put into practice after socialist revolutions. Lenin, Stalin, Deng Xiaoping and other practical communist leaders have corrected Marx’s mistakes; but they have never publicly admitted to Marx’s errors. To the contrary, socialist countries continued to export Marxism to the neo-colonial world right up until Perestroika (1989).

As a still more-forward-looking digression, note the following. BRICS will never be able to become an anti-imperialist United Socialist States and overtake the imperialists if any of its major nations or their leaders retain their national prejudices and idiosyncrasies or pretend to be infallible and refuse to admit mistakes. America was and remains a melting pot. Immigrants to it were and are melted down, homogenized. BRICS citizens are staying in place. BRICS must accomplish by conscious political decision and agreement what Anglo-American imperialism accomplished over thousands of years by geographic and economic necessity. The United Socialist States must also speak the world’s most simple trade and port language (English), which evolved over the course of three maritime empires, the American, the British and the Trojan. (Yes, Homer’s Troy, the Bronze Age capital of the world was in England. The Brits are still lying about it.)

Trotsky saw the theoretical contradictions between Marxism and the national socialism (or state capitalism) that was evolving in Russia. He wrote about them in his “The Revolution Betrayed” (1936). But Trotsky, amazingly, was too myopic to see, even firsthand, that Marxism wasn’t working; and he was expelled from the Russian Communist Party.

The synthesis, the correct definition of the class struggle wasn’t discovered until I articulated it in early, 1991 versions of my major work, Decoding the Deluge and Finding the Path for Civilization . To wit: the people on top in terms of income, wealth and education resemble the large mammals in pursuing a K, quality, reproductive strategy. Those toward the bottom of society in terms of the same resemble the small animals and insects in pursuing the R, quantity, reproductive strategy. K and R cause and define each other, which is why the class struggle can never be won. It must be minimized, K and R must each be minimized, by maximizing, respectively, equal opportunity and population control. This is necessary to permanently and effectively solve ANY of our pervasive and persistent problems, as all of them are symptoms of K and/or R. This is what is necessary to create a cooperative, civilized and sustainable world; and we shall remain semi-civilized savages until we do this.

A shorthand expression of the same is to say that we must extend the Golden Rule (ethical reciprocity, the essence of modern religion) to the most important sphere of social life, the sphere of our reproductive competition.

Nobody wants to compromise, but as Freud observed, every major advance in civilization involves the renunciation of an instinctual impulse and the acceptance of some form of compensation.

The elite Ks are supremely arrogant and alienated. The pre-WWII leaders of the Soviet Union could not expect them to compromise. Even if they had known my definition of the class struggle and had put it forth, it is most unlikely that the Anglo-American ruling class would have shelved their plans for WWII. They still can’t be expected to compromise, and the Communist Party leaders must defend socialism by remaining prepared for war and by matching or exceeding imperialist military power.

BUT by appearing to retain a one-sided, outmoded and prejudicial ideology, endless, Marxist war of class extermination becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Peace has no chance.

Are ALL the leaders of our contemporary world Orwellian Big Brothers? Latent homosexuals who compulsively lie and fight? Who are afraid of basic truth and change because they unconsciously associate it with their Third Masks, the mask hiding their homosexual love for their brothers? Are they ALL afraid of a classless and nationless, equal opportunity and population-controlled world wherein people marry for love instead of breeding?

Personally, I’m more than anxious to live in a new and better world. But had I been in the shoes of the elite, pre-WWII Ks, with their limited socialization and education and confronted by an implacable Marxist opponent; I’m sure I would have planned WWII exactly as they did.

My Motive for this Exposé

I shall prove to you that the elite, Anglo-American Ks planned WWII, not because I wish to punish anyone or load all the blame onto a scapegoat. As with the current wars, everyone who was not a Quaker, a Jehovah’s Witness, or a member of the Peace Love and Progress Party or who was not, like the Russian People, or presently the Palestinian People, thoroughly on the defensive, bore some responsibility for the war. ?Everyone else bought into it and continues to buy into it.

My motive for this exposé is to merely suggest the possibility of a less bloody and quicker path to the inevitable, communist future of humanity, of humanity united into one virtual and loving family. It would be nice, also, if we could get there in time to avert WWIII or the next Great Flood. In no case will that communist future be attained without all of us sharing an honest understanding of our history.

Der Führer (the leader) was just a much-aggrandized Bezahlter Angestellter (salaried employee)

We are told that Hitler’s father, the head clerk in the government of an Austrian town, changed the family name from Schicklegruber to Hitler. I have been unable to find any German word from which schickle or schickel might have been derived. It is quite possible that it is a variant or corruption of the Yiddish or Hebrew word shekel, which means money. A gruber is one who digs. So, the name meant “money-grubber,” “money-digger,” or in the American vernacular – gold-digger.

This would seem to provide sufficient reason for one to change the surname. But German people tend to be proud of their ancestry and generally only modify names when they migrate to a different linguistic culture.

Moreover, “Hitler” isn’t even a German name. It’s the American concept of a hitman with the English suffix man replaced by ler, a variant of the German equivalent, er, one who does or associates with some activity. The root of Hitler, hit, is not German for anything. Schlagen is the German word for hit. Obviously, the name Hitler was invented by Englishmen that associated the word with the mission they had assigned to Herr Hitler. ?As for the date of recording of the name change, with enough money and power, records anywhere in the world, even vital statistics, can be and often are altered.

We are told also that Hitler/Schicklegruber was a German patriot and decorated WWI veteran, a war hero. Yet, at least three facts suggest otherwise. First, Hitler’s commanding officer in Flanders told his daughter that Corporal Hitler “had had no friends in their regiment and had kept himself very much to himself.” (See https://www.france24.com/en/20120707-germany-adolf-hitler-heinrich-himmler-nazis-ss-judge-letter-holocaust .) Was Flanders, on the far-western front, where Hitler made his first contacts with Anglo-American intelligence? War heroes tend to be the latent homosexual men with strong emotional attachments to their comrades in arms. (You don’t fall on a grenade, for example, to save people you haven’t learned to love and identify with.)

Secondly, unlike Ernst R?hm, Hitler had no war buddies that followed him into politics. R?hm was a thrice-wounded captain that helped to organize the Nazi Party before Hitler was introduced to it. R?hm was also a top organizer and leader of the SA, the Sturmabteilung, the Brownshirts. R?hm helped Hitler win the support of the army in Bavaria and supported him in his failed coup de’ tat known as the Beer Hall Putsch . Follow the link to read about it if you aren’t already familiar. R?hm spent brief time in prison for his role in it. But R?hm was an independent thinker with a kleinburger, petty bourgeois, worldview. His SA financed itself with the revenues of a cigarette company it founded. R?hm was ultimately betrayed and sentenced to death by Hitler when R?hm’s SA became involved in a power struggle with the better-connected SS (Schutzstaffel, protection staff or guard) led by Himler.

Finally, on the subject of Hitler’s alleged military record, note that the imperialist intelligence services have a long tradition of inventing heroic military records for their puppet dictators. This practice offers superb advantages! Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos, for example, was destined for political stardom as soon as he stepped forth publicly with a fabricated war record. Anglo-American intelligence knew it was fabricated and that he had bribed buddies to verify it. With this knowledge in secret American possession, Marcos became the ideal dictator that they could manipulate or depose at any time with just a newspaper article!

In the period, from the Beer Hall Putsch to his rise to Chancellor (president), Hitler’s status as an Anglo-American intelligence operative is especially obvious. What man of no significant education and without powerful socio-economic or political connections would dare to organize and lead an attempt to overthrow a government? Obviously, no one.

Yet, we are supposed to believe that this is what Hitler did! Certainly, he was an excellent actor and orator. I too am an excellent actor and orator. As I relate in my memoir, Heaven Sent , the American intelligence community started grooming me for politics and training me in these skills starting in my eighth school year. I’m so good in these skills that, in my country, I am not allowed to speak in public or practice law (unless I sell my soul to the top gangsters). But even with these skills and education too, I wouldn’t dream of leading a revolution or even a coup de’ tat without a well-disciplined army behind me or someone willing and able to finance one!

You can bet the ranch that before Hitler launched the Beer Hall Putsch, he had the UK and the US Governments behind him. In fact, I’m going to convince you, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Hitler was probably no more than two persons secretly removed from both the UK Prime Minister and the US President.

For the first, UK connection consider Rudolph Hess (below).

Rudolph Hess was Deputy Führer from Hitler’s rise to Chancellor (president) in January of 1933 until 1941 when he flew solo to Scotland in attempt to negotiate the UK’s exit from the war.? He was demoted from Hitler’s successor to the position of number three man when Herman G?ring displaced him at the September 1939 outbreak of the war.

Wikipedia tells us the following about Hess:

“Hess, the eldest of three children, was born on 26 April 1894 in?al-Ibrahimiyya, a suburb of?Alexandria,?Egypt?(then under British occupation, though formally a part of the?Ottoman Empire), into a wealthy German family.? ... Hess's youth in Egypt left him with a strong admiration for the British Empire.?Hess's youth…made him unique among the Nazi leaders in that he grew up under British rule, which he saw in very positive terms.”

Hess was a highly educated man and an Anglophile. If not Hitler’s most direct connection to British intelligence, Hess was his most important and reliable connection. Hess escaped to Austria after the putsch but voluntarily turned himself in at Landsberg Prison in order to be with Hitler and help Hitler write and edit Mein Kampf, “My Struggle.” Was he ordered to turn himself in? Leniency could only be arranged by powerful others. In any case, during their eight months together at Landsberg, Hess would have also helped Hitler polish his acting and oratory skills.

If you doubt for a moment my contention that Hess was Hitler’s primary connection to British intelligence or that he flew to Scotland in 1941 with Hitler’s secret encouragement, consider this. Unlike the other top Nazis, Hess was NOT sentenced to death at the Nuremburg Trials. Hess got life in prison at Berlin’s Spandau Prison where he was, for most of his sentence, the ONLY PRISONER. From 1966 until his death by suicide in 1987, Hess was attended only by the prison warden. In other words, they couldn’t kill Hess for fear that his wealthy and powerful family would go public with what Hess and the family knew. They had to keep him isolated for the same reason: he might share what he knew with other people.

Another top Nazi received a relatively light, twenty-year sentence for similar reasons. Albert Speer was an architect who served as Reich’s Minister of Armaments and Production. Speer was too close to all the top German industrialists. Had they punished Speer too severely, he would have turned the public spotlight upon the German elites. As is customary in class society, the elites of the ruling class get to stay in the shadows. The members of the lower classes that they elevate to positions of wealth and power are expected to take the blame, to be their fall guys, to fall on their swords whenever great crimes are exposed or wars are lost.

Hitler’s most direct connection to the US Government was undoubtedly Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl (above, 2 February 1887 – 6 November 1975). German-American Hanfstaengl was a businessman and close friend of?Adolf Hitler. Wikipedia says,

“He was born in Munich, Bavaria, Germany, the son of a German art publisher,?Edgar Hanfstaengl, and an American mother. He spent most of his early years in Germany and later moved to the United States. His mother was Katharine Wilhelmina Heine, daughter of?Wilhelm Heine, a cousin of?American Civil War?Union Army?general?John Sedgwick. His godfather was?Duke Ernst II?of?Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.”

Hold everything! Where have you heard the name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha? That is the real name of the British royal family. King George V changed their name to Windsor to hide their German ancestry in 1917, during WWI.

Again, quoting Wikipedia, “He eventually fell out of favor with Hitler and defected from?Nazi Germany?to the United States.” I’m guessing that “defection” was after Hitler was appointed Chancellor and no longer needed American financing or protection. Hanfstaengl later worked for?Franklin D. Roosevelt.

It is already well known that FDR was the organizer/fixer for war in the Pacific. As an Undersecretary of the Navy, he persuaded the admirals of the US Naval War College to go to war with Japan in 1922, almost 20 years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. For twenty years, the United States enforced numerous secret treaty agreements between the Americans, British, Dutch and French to lock Japan out of EVERY resource needed for industry. Western industrialists feared that they simply could not compete with Japan, so they locked her out of the game. They were like the big bully that stands behind a little guy, secretly pinching him until he is forced to fight.

That famous speech that FDR read to the nation, “Today, December seventh, 1941, is a day that will live in infamy,” could have been penned twenty years in advance. (See “Prelude to Pearl Harbor,” by former US Navy bird colonel Gerald E. Wheeler. This 1963 publication of the University of Missouri Press was republished in the 1990s to reveal the contents of newly declassified state department documents.)

Franklin Roosevelt was the personification of slick. “Slick” is American gangster slang to describe a gangster with refined manners, one on whom criminal charges slide off and don’t stick. My guess is that Roosevelt was the fixer for the Second World War in Europe too. With all that he knew, the other elite K gangsters had to make him president. He was a dangerous man!

Moreover, FDR’s contraction of polio (now referred to as muscular dystrophy), AS AN ADULT, verifies that he was burdened beneath a mountain of guilt. MS is a self-depreciation dis-ease. It generally occurs in very young people who have acquiesced to molestation by a close family member. (Ryke Geerd Hamer discovered how our autonomic nervous system evolved and functions. It plays the critical role in all dis-ease. To learn about the revolutionary New Medicine, read this introduction and follow its references.)

According to Wikipedia, Hanfstaengl was also a Harvard grad. After graduation from Harvard and throughout WWI, he stayed in America. The American branch of his father’s art business was confiscated after WWI, so the US Government had a hold on him. FDR, Teddy Roosevelt, Wm Randolph Hearst, and Walter Lippman were all in his circle of friends. So, in Ernst Hanfstaengl, Hitler had at least one very powerful link to the American ruling class.

Also, according to Wikipedia, "A fellow member of the Harvard's?Hasty Pudding club?who worked at the?U.S. Embassy?asked Hanfstaengl to assist a military attaché sent to observe the political scene in Munich. Just before returning to Berlin, the attaché, Captain?Truman Smith, suggested that Hanfstaengl go to a?Nazi?rally as a favor and report his impressions of Hitler.” (H We are supposed to believe that Adolph and Ernst met at this late time and by accident.) “Hanfstaengl was so fascinated by Hitler that he soon became one of his most intimate followers, although he did not formally join the?Nazi Party?until 1931."

I seem to recall a Youtube video, which said that, after the failed march, on Day Two of the beer hall putsch, Hitler escaped the armed battle in a getaway car driven by a Captain Smith. But I have been unable to find and verify that video.

But here is the proof in the hasty pudding. It is widely known that several days after the failed putsch, putsch leader Adolph Hitler was captured by the police in the attic of Hanfstaengl’s suburban Munich home. Hanfstaengl’s wife supposedly sheltered him there and prevented him from taking his own life.

Now, Dear Reader, if you were on the run, after a failed, treasonous and criminal undertaking, where would you feel most safe and try to go? Answer: the hideout or home of your superior in the criminal undertaking. For he would be the person that you could be most sure to trust, the person least likely to turn you in to the police.

As the economic depression in Germany deepened, so did the suffering and the anger of the German people. The popularity of Hitler and the Nazis grew in lock step with that anger because they were the most outspoken opponents of the Versailles Treaty and the emasculated Weimar Republic it produced.

That much is clear. But Hitler’s elevation to the Chancellorship (presidency) after the 1932 elections is shrouded in mystery because an essential aspect of it has always been hidden from the public.

Pardon me, but I am going to have to ask you to take my personal word on this.

During my five-month stay in Berlin, in the mid-1970s, I was becoming a member of the Sozialistische Einheits Partei, Germany’s leading communist party at that time. Party comrades assured me that they had in their safe-keeping a letter given to them by Anna Hindenburg, the wife of ex-WWI general and ex-Chancellor Hindenburg.

The letter was addressed to Hindenburg and signed by the seventeen wealthiest, German industrialists. It very concisely said that they had chosen to support Mr. Hitler and asked Chancellor (or President) Hindenburg to resign in favor of Hitler. He did so the next day.?

Although Hitler and his Nazi Party were rapidly rising in power and two years later became the largest parliamentary party, the Weimar Constitution called for direct presidential elections and required runoffs until one candidate obtained a majority of the votes for president. In the 1932 runoff, Hindenburg achieved a majority of the votes. Hindenburg had been legally elected and was not required to concede power to anyone. It was the letter and the loss of elite, capitalist K support that prompted Hindenburg’s resignation. Hindenburg knew what should now be clear to all of us: the German ruling class had decided to cooperate and participate in the UK and US plan to destroy the Soviet Union and to turn over their people and their military as the spearhead of the operation. In return for their cooperation, they would have been promised immunity from post-war prosecution and the right to keep their best assets.

All the events from Hitler’s installation as Chancellor forward are clear and easy to understand. As the Communist Party was furiously developing agriculture and industry in Soviet Russia and moving whole industries deeper into Russia and out of the path of invasion, the whole of the West was also tooling up for war. All the other western countries pretended not to notice as German war preparations violated the provisions of the Versailles Treaty and led the military spending and recovery from the worldwide, economic depression.

Continental Europe and Scandinavia were expected to provide logistical support. As a general rule, ten productive workers are needed to support every soldier in the field.

The armaments buildup in Britain and the US was more cunning. The Anglo-Americans intended to stay back behind their protective moats and join the fray only after the tigers had exhausted themselves and a clear winner emerged. The elite Anglo-American Ks wanted that winner to be fascist Germany, but the Rs of the UK and the US favored Soviet Russia. In the US there also remained a strong isolationist movement that wanted no part in foreign wars.

They could only enter the war on the side of the winner. It is very important to understand why they could only enter on the side of the winner. Listen carefully. What we traditionally and politely call a government is actually a state. States are instruments of class violence and consist essentially of a professional military, police, and law-making system. States were invented at the start of the Neolithic (class society). They were invented of, by, and for the propertied, K class; and most still are of, by, and for the propertied Ks. If the US and the UK had entered the war on the side of the Germans, as the elite Ks of those countries actually wanted to do, AFTER SOVIET RUSSIA WAS CLEARLY DEFEATING GERMANY; then revolutions would have occurred in the US and the UK. The Rs of the US and the UK would have united behind Soviet Russia, the Comintern, and their domestic communist parties to overthrow the British and American K states.

So, the Anglo-American ruling class elites pretended that Hitler and the other, Spanish and Italian fascists were less aggressive than they actually were. The Nazis used false-flag operations to camouflage their aggression. The Reichstag was said to have been burnt down by the Communists who, even with a following of only ten percent, were said to be preparing a revolution. That was the pretext for rounding up and murdering all of them. Polish soldiers were falsely claimed to have launched a cross-border attack on the Wehrmacht, providing a pretext for the invasion of Poland in September of 1939. That was the event that enabled Churchill (less of an elitist and more of an R at heart) to become Prime Minister and forced the UK to declare war on Germany.

Repression inside Germany had slowly increased as of Hitler’s rise to power in 1933. Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels gradually took control of all the news media, arts, and information. Books were burned across Germany starting in 1933, especially at universities. Antisemitism and Aryan superiority were gradually dialed up on a pace to fill up the concentration camps that were being built to hide the expropriation and super-exploitation of minorities, especially Jews.

But before Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of Soviet Russia, could be launched, on June 22nd, 1941, France and Scandinavia had also to be harnessed for the cause. The US and the UK continued to sit back and bide their time as this was done. The Maginot Line was breached and a third of a million British and French troops were pushed off the Continent at Dunkirk, in late May and early June of 1940. This cleared the way for the take-over of France.

Those 338,000 British and French troops were able to take their sweet time, nine days, in escaping to Britain because Hitler personally halted the panzer-led attack upon them.

The British and American invasions of North Africa and even Italy and the Balkans were peripheral, flanking attacks that didn’t interfere much with the war against Soviet Russia.

The Normandie invasion, which the Soviets had been constantly pleading for, didn’t occur until June 6th, 1944. This was AFTER the tide of the war was turned by the Russians with their February 2nd, 1943 victory at Stalingrad.

Moreover, D-Day notwithstanding, the Western Front was a cake walk compared to the Eastern Front. General Patton, the most aggressive American general, was repeatedly ordered to slow down! A Wehrmacht veteran and older co-worker of mine, when I worked in a Berlin factory, confided in me that the fighting on the Eastern Front was so much more ferocious that German soldiers were remortgaging their houses in order to get the bribe money needed for a transfer from the Eastern to the Western Front!

Eisenhauer, a German-American, and the supreme commander of the British and American forces, either knew or at least sensed the truth. After the war and as US President, he publicly apologized for the impotence of his presidency in the face of the “military-industrial complex” and its interests.

Conclusion

The Anglo-American ruling class planned WWII. They planned it in what they thought was self-defense! The Marxist Communists were telling them that they were to be exterminated by their class antagonists both personally (like the Romanovs) and as a class. Their behavior was both understandable and predictable! Adolph Hitler was merely their grandest employee and chief prosecutor. David Huttner can’t claim credit for any of it.

I do have two final requests of you, Dear Reader. (1) Be a good Nazi gangster, and (2) don’t share this communist propaganda with anyone.

For Peace, Love and Progress ,

Dave Huttner

April 28, 2024