Who Is Apparently Ignoring Court Orders, Olivier Jornot?

A Question of Judicial Integrity and Transparency

For years, a Geneva whistleblower has faced relentless judicial obstacles while attempting to access critical legal records, including the outcomes of her criminal complaints dating back to 2013 which have been confirmed to be subject to criminal proceedings by the Geneva Police and other bodies. Now, evidence suggests that there have been failures to enforce court rulings for years, raising serious concerns about the rule of law and accountability in Geneva.

A Systematic Denial of Data Access

In a letter dated May 5, 2022, Geneva’s Attorney General, Olivier Jornot, formally denied the whistleblower access to data she claims is necessary for her defence in alleged #SLAPP proceedings. Despite Swiss legal provisions guaranteeing transparency and the right to access case files, the request was dismissed, citing procedural technicalities.

However, what makes this refusal even more troubling is the apparent existence of court orders that have not been enforced. Are these court orders against the authorities themselves?

If court orders were issued to ensure due process, provide access to case files, or even halt retaliatory legal actions, why have they not been enforced? Could it be that these rulings implicate high-ranking legal and political figures, including Jornot?

Jornot’s refusal to disclose documents—including possible exculpatory evidence—raises the question: Is the Geneva judiciary suppressing these orders because they do not align with its own interests? The whistleblower has long alleged judicial harassment and obstruction in Geneva, particularly from actors with apparent conflicts of interest.

This raises concerns that authorities have ignored rulings that could expose malfeasance at the highest levels. The lack of enforcement may reflect not only administrative inertia but deliberate suppression of legally binding decisions.

Judicial Harassment and SLAPP Tactics

The whistleblower has also claimed that Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) have been used against her—an increasingly recognized tactic where legal systems are weaponized to silence critics, drain their resources, and obstruct justice. The whistleblower feels that legal authorities have pursued such tactics under the guise of "due process" while systematically denying access to case materials that could dismantle these apparently sham fabricated proceedings.

Transparency and Accountability

If Switzerland is to uphold its commitment to judicial independence and the rule of law, it must clarify the status of these court orders and explain why they apparently remain unimplemented, leaving her and her family exposed to further risk, including what she describes as relentless and intrusive criminal retribution and judicial harassment since she was irrefutably blacklisted (legal) on August 22nd 2013.

The Geneva whistleblower, like other whistleblowers in Switzerland, is raising urgent concerns that go beyond individual cases. At stake is the fundamental principle of whether it's possible to access justice against well-connected players.

The question remains: Who is responsible for ignoring these court orders, and why?