Who cleans your coffee cups?
Copyright Kiri Parr

Who cleans your coffee cups?

If you work in a large corporate office, chances are there is some person who doesn’t work for your company but who comes in before you do and cleans up the kitchen, stacks away all the dirty coffee cups that got dumped on the kitchen bench overnight and cleaned up the bits of exploding cheese in the microwave.

You might know their name. You may even stop to talk to them. They may even become well enough known to be invited to the birthday morning tea celebrations.

But they really are not your problem, and the kitchens are nice and clean which you really like. You don’t have to care why they are ill or sick (someone else will be sent along after all), and they do not share in your company’s bonus schemes or your newly introduced family violence leave policies.

Outsourcing the cleaning did away with the endless office emails reminding you that you wouldn’t leave your own kitchen that way. And you will never have to step in and stack the dishwasher yourself when someone is sick or on holiday.

Winners all round, right? Outsourcing the cleaning is legally and economically rational.

But is it?

In an examination of the consequences to schools in Australia following the outsourcing of cleaners [1], (a huge trend in economic rationalism that gained traction in the 1980s), a whole range of consequences emerged:

  • There was a reduction in direct contact between the school and its cleaners as to the health and safety issues at schools.
  • Increased paperwork and bureaucracy, the cleaners (often independent contractor’s) dealing with a barrage of independent communication channels from the organisation they were engaged through and the schools who had to manage tender processes and administer these new contracts (and problems under them).
  • Additional management to supervise the cleaners.
  • Teachers and parents picking up the tasks not explicitly covered by the cleaning contract or not done because the cheap price that won the job led to short cuts.
  • Insecurity, with minimum pay slashed to zero the cleaners no longer had the stable employment needed to qualify for mortgages.
  • Loss of trusted adults in the school yard outside of the teaching hierarchy.
  • Loss of consequences and remorse for the kid making the mess – they don’t know the name of that cleaner after all.

Another area the subject of extensive examination is in the arena of hospital privatisation, especially following the extensive adoption of the public private partnership (PPP) model in this industry. In most cases the private sector is responsible for providing many parts of a hospital’s essential services, like cleaning, asset management and catering[2] in exchange for an agreed fee.

Championed as cost effective and efficient, what emerged in practice included:

  • Loss of morale. Imagine being responsible for looking after patients but having no direct control over a fundamental thing, like food quality, which keep your patients healthy. Or being in the radiology department and fearful that your service is the next to be outsourced.
  • Increased management, administrative and legal costs because no one fully considered what it would take to actually manage the PPP contract and relationship.
  • Loss of pride. Staff no longer working for the hospital directly become contract employees with little vested interest in the hospital’s outcomes.? Combined with the pay squeezes, loss of job certainty and staff reductions, we get a lack of care, trust, and quality.
  • Ward support staff picking up the grey between where the outsourced works starts and stops, adding to staff tension and frustration.

In many cases, hospital privatisations were back sourced, the services retuning to the control of the hospital.

So, before you reach for your clean coffee cup as you plan to save your company dollars in the next round of outsourcing:

  • Have you thought about how people will actually behave in the business structure you are crafting?
  • What costs of the model have you underestimated or not taken into account?
  • What strategies do you really need to put in place to make the model work?
  • What are your organisation’s values and is the model aligned with those values.? ?Are you creating a divide between the haves and have nots?

Do you know the name of the person who cleans your coffee cup and what price you really pay for not knowing their name?


[1] Frances Flanagan, ‘What’s the school cleaner’s name? How kids, not just cleaners, are paying the price of?outsourcing’ The Conversation, April 26, 2019

[2] Risky Business, ‘The pitfalls and Missteps of Hospital Privatisation, the McKell Institute, November 2014

Manji Chhabhadia

Bridges and Civil Structures

2 年

Cleaning responsibilities start at a young age and it seems the Japanese might have nailed it as their cultural behaviour carries through life. https://www.good.is/articles/japan-children-clean-schools

回复
Naomi Dickinson

Delivering Impactful Project Outcomes

3 年

Interesting read. This is also why cleaners and cooks are leaving aged care facilities, to take on more lucrative contracts elsewhere. Because the risk of causing an outbreak will likely result in deaths. The consequence has been for the limited number of nurses having to work in the kitchen and clean just to keep ACFs afloat.

Fiona Yeang

Lawyer - construction, engineering, infrastructure projects | Sessional Academic | Advocating for disability access & inclusion

3 年

Good points Kiri. In my experience the perils of outsourcing are compounded by the focus on price rather than value. Such a common theme!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kiri Parr的更多文章

  • How do you save money on Mass Transit Projects?

    How do you save money on Mass Transit Projects?

    Building mass transit projects is expensive. But just how much do expenses vary from country to country? For some good…

    9 条评论
  • Stadium Megaprojects

    Stadium Megaprojects

    Debate about whether Brisbane should build a brand-new stadium for the 2032 Brisbane Olympic games is on once again…

    13 条评论
  • No Procurement Pass for the DTA

    No Procurement Pass for the DTA

    On Wednesday 21 September 2022 the ANAO published its audit into the Digital Transformation Agency’s Procurement of…

    2 条评论
  • Observations on an Inquiry

    Observations on an Inquiry

    In March 2022 the House of representatives Standing Committee on Infrastructure, Transport and Cities published the…

    12 条评论
  • Designing Project Success Governance Strategies

    Designing Project Success Governance Strategies

    Every construction project has a system of governance that exists to achieve the project’s aims, whether that system is…

    10 条评论
  • Insight - Major Infrastructure Program Delivery Capacity

    Insight - Major Infrastructure Program Delivery Capacity

    Today, the Victorian Attorney General’s Office published a Report “Major Infrastructure Program Delivery Capacity”. The…

    6 条评论
  • Apples and Orangutans

    Apples and Orangutans

    The latest Grattan Institute Report Megabang for Megabucks has come in for quite some flack over its headline that…

    12 条评论
  • Max Abrahamson on Risk Management – we threw the baby out with the bathwater!

    Max Abrahamson on Risk Management – we threw the baby out with the bathwater!

    Max Abrahamson gave a renowned paper in October 1982 on Risk Management. My entire career I have heard it narrowed down…

    10 条评论
  • What we can learn from a Safety Anarchist

    What we can learn from a Safety Anarchist

    If you are interested in human behaviour and how people work, then I highly recommend reading the work of Sydney…

    7 条评论
  • Review of 'Four Ways To Scale Up" by Flyvberg.

    Review of 'Four Ways To Scale Up" by Flyvberg.

    Page 12 is where I got hooked into the paper "Four Ways to Scale Up: Smart, Dumb, Forced and Fumbled" by Bent Flyvberg…

    3 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了