IT - WHITHER THOU GOEST?

No alt text provided for this image

IT – Whither Thou Goest?

By W H Inmon

Just today there appeared an article in the WSJ that was really interesting. The article was It’s Time to get rid of the IT department, by Joe Peppard. If you haven’t read it I really recommend that you do.

https://www.dhirubhai.net/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6871113454632095744/

One of the points raised in the article is – how and why did the IT department get divorced from the business it operates in? Now that is a very good question.

Like most widespread phenomenon, there is not one single answer. Instead, there is a whole panoply of answers.

One of the factors is that the IT department’s success is not measured in the same way as classical business success. IT is measured on such things as response time, transactions run, system availability, installation of new systems, etc. Business on the other hand is measured on such things as profitability, new customers, revenue growth, and so forth. There simply is little or no connection between what IT considered important and what business considers important.

But there are other factors.

Consider this. For years IT management bought into the “silver bullet”. Every crazy silver bullet the vendor brought into IT, IT management bought hook, line, and sinker. The problem was that 99% of these silver bullets were harem scarum ideas that never panned out. Yet IT management took the corporation right down the expensive garden path. The business got tired of financing the IT experiments that were never examined closely and never worked. Business wanted results, not broken promises.

Another sign of the weakness of IT management was the fact that IT management followed vendors like a Pavlovian puppy dog. IT management thought the vendor was telling them good business advice. Instead, the vendor was just selling more product. IT management could not distinguish good advice from a sales pitch.

Where else in the world does a manager need the approval of a consulting company in order to make a purchase? Yet IT management does exactly that. They support a whole cadre of industry analysts that make pronouncements on the fitness of technology. But a close look behind the covers shows that most of those industry analysts receive money from the very companies that they are supposedly analyzing. Now how objective do you think those recommendations are? Yet IT management follows the analysts around like an animal that is being led by its nose.

Admittedly there are a lot of other factors. It is true that technology is changing all the time. Keeping up with technology is a full time job. Another factor is that there has been no formal preparation for making managerial decisions for IT. There has long been preparation for doctors, accountants and engineers. But there simply has been no formal preparation for the management of IT. It was as if one day technology descended on the earth and whoever happened to be convenient in the corporation was tapped for being the IT manager.

To summarize matters…. Several years ago, I was talking with a technician at a large telecommunications firm. I mentioned the word “customer” to him. To my surprise he said “customer”? What’s that? Do we have them?

And I am not joking. That really happened.

The lunatics are running the asylum.

Bill Inmon – the father of data warehousing has a firm – Forest Rim Technology - that reads and analyzes text and turns that text into a data base. Bill is based in Denver, Colorado


Nick Stachniak

Solutions Architect, ArangoDB

2 年

Glad to see your incisive wit has not dulled over the years! Great comment Joel! Truly put!!

回复
Maarten van der Heijden

Data Architect at Tata Steel BV, designer of data constructs.

2 年

Sadly not only IT-management runs after the next hype, also the rest of management does. Shiny reports and screens are what lures them in. The result is that in larger companies software functionality and data overlaps in places it shouldn't, which makes understanding the organisation more and more difficult.

回复
Kewal Dhariwal, CCP, CBIP, CDP, I.S.P.(Ret.), FCIPS

Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute (AMII) - University of Alberta (Management Advisory Board)

2 年

Loved your perspectives - The priests of the big iron (mainframe) when computers and programming was a secret society of controlled knowledge is where this thinking emanated and the IBM Business Development folks perpetuated the myth. ERP and Database and Data Analytics vendors took up that profit model and thus emerged the ‘silver bullet’. Wasn’t silver bullets and silver daggers often used to kill vampires? It’s time to build a better IT model for the business world where an enterprise system can be built easily from open source resources and by the business people not specialists focussed on protecting their jobs and supernormal profits.

回复
Richard Tanler

“Information at our fingertips” is now the modern reality. Next, we need to “See Knowledge”, See inside information.

2 年

The problem is compounded by the techno-babble that is advanced and immediately embraced to create the illusion of sophistication.

回复
Alaa Mahjoub, M.Sc. Eng.

Advisor: Digital Business | Operational Technology | Data & Analytics | Enterprise Architecture

2 年

Thank you, Bill, I really enjoyed reading your article.?? I am afraid that if corporations follow the views in the WSJ article, then instead of having the corporation's IT following a whole cadre of industry analysts around like an animal that is being led by its nose, we will have the whole corporation following a whole cadre of Cloud Service Providers around like an animal that is being led by its nose; but this time, not only regarding the aspects of the technology but also regarding the aspects of people and processes.? Why is that? because the WSJ article mentions "if you have your own data centres, on-site servers, and software, you will need specialists to manage all this tech. This was the original objective of the IT department. But with cloud computing and other technology innovations, having hardware or software physically on the premises is no longer necessary". And then the article concludes with “Organizations need IT. But they almost certainly don’t need an IT department.” Thank you again, for sharing the #wallstreetjournal article. Best Regards, Alaa Mahjoub

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了