Which Businesses Should We Open or Close?
Researchers are already applying this approach to determine which businesses should open first:
Source. Notes: danger is calculated taking into account the number of visits, the number of unique visitors, and person-hours of visits above two density thresholds. So banks are quite safe because few people visit, those who do tend to be the same all the time, and they don’t spend a lot of time. Conversely, lots of different people go to gyms and cafes, and they spend a long time there—in the case of cafés, talking a lot face to face. The importance comes from a combination of how much people care about different businesses based on surveys, and how much wealth they generate based on employment and receipts. Note that this model isn’t perfect because it doesn’t account for face-to-face conversations or singing. Further models should account for that, and ideally for other things such as empirical evidence.
Based on this analysis (which looked at real-world data such as mobility, consumer preferences, and government statistics) banks and grocery stores are the most important to maintain open, while gyms or cafés should remain closed and be the last to reopen. It is not perfect, but it gives a broad priority for the order of reopening:
- If they were closed, banks, finance companies, grocery and general stores should be the first to reopen
- After that, reopen department stores, colleges and universities, clothing and shoe stores, and auto-dealers and mechanics
- Next would come furniture and home good stores, electronic stories, barbers and salons, hardware stores, places of worship, casinos, office supply stores, and movie theaters
- Next come amusement parks, book stores, museums, pet and supply stores, and liquor and tobacco stores.
- The last to open should be sporting goods stores, gyms, cafes, and dessert parlors
Interestingly, the analysis confirms the types of businesses that countries have already prioritized intuitively, even with imperfect data.
Models like this are not perfect yet. For example, I disagree with their conclusion on eateries. It’s true that fast food restaurants should open before sit-down restaurants, since people stay for much less time and talk less, but this paper suggests we could reopen some of them at full capacity early on. That’s because they don’t account for the huge danger that is added in eateries of people sitting face to face for long periods of time. They also don’t account for creative ways businesses could adapt to reopen safely. Gyms, for example, could limit attendance, reorganize floor space, require people to maintain a 6-feet distance, and/or have someone on staff keeping all spaces clean full time, like in this gym:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtUYZsBaIkI&t=60s
Businesses could also impose stronger restrictions during exclusive business hours for older clients. This is just an example, and in the end, the broader question might not be “Which businesses should open?” but rather “How can businesses reopen safely?”
Families and Transit
In China, outside of Hubei, around 80% of infections involved families and close contacts in the household. This is surely an effect of home quarantines since mass gatherings were limited. But it illustrates how much the virus spreads in families.
Among these contacts, the highest risk by far is transmission to spouses: 28% of them end up infected, compared to 17% for other adults in the household and just 4% of kids below 18 years old.
Nevertheless, we can probably draw conclusions that are applicable elsewhere:
- Stopping infections at home can have a dramatic effect on the epidemic
- You are not very likely to catch the virus from random people on the street.
- You are, however, very likely to catch it from your spouse, your kids, your parents or the friends you visit.
Transit also has an impact, although it’s unclear if it’s due to traveling with family members or caught in transit from other people.
So treat your family members with caution. Try to avoid interacting physically with members that are at risk. Call them instead. If somebody has symptoms, try to isolate that person. It’s hard to do that with a family member, but the alternative can be more sickness, a visit to the hospital, or death. So if there are symptoms, avoid kisses, hugs, or even talking face to face without a mask.
Thank you Dr. Muge Cevik for your round-ups of papers.
For more information, check out the full article here, our LinkedIn community here, and for email updates, you can register here.
Also, please tag a colleague because the further we can spread this information, the better equipped we are to fight the pandemic.
Founder and owner at Mesa de Temporada Catering
4 年Tus gráficos siempre a?aden valor Tomás. Gracias!
Functional Safety Engineer (AFSP) | Project/Product Management | Operations | IATF:16949 | CAPEX |
4 年This isn’t a perfect model, but George EP Box has said, some models are useful! This one for sure is a very useful model. Systems dynamics cannot be explained any better.
Business Development & Integration Officer
4 年Small gyms - ie less than 10 capacity, why should these be wrapped up in last to open. The owners are at stage of crying I need to get cash flowing, I have high quality athletes that need to resume training, given 3month break can significantly impact an athlete’s progress etc. Risk & cost benefit assessment must dig deep to be of true value
Founder, Startups, Innovation, Investing, Pensions, VC deals
4 年Thank you as always Tomas. I do feel however that important variables are not taken into account, which I will explain. However, given casinos are rated more important and less dangerous than barbers and salons etc,we have to seriously question the ability of the general public to judge this ovjectively. It is safe to say there is absolutely no need for casinos, and the only negative impact to a community is possible job losses. Furthermore, there are ample opportunities to gamble online, which leads to the first overlooked factor. To what extend is a service possible online without adverse impacts. To me that relates to the emotional human connection which for example teachers do provide. The second factor is what is the long term consequence of staying closed longer. Musea, theaters etc may not survive and never come back, given the public didn't deem them important enough. Thirdly, in which way can businesses operate safely. For example gyms are closed. But why? All you have to do is impose age and health restrictions. It would be safe with some measures others take. Banks on the other hand can be entirely online with no impact to the service. In conclusion, sometimes it's better not to ask the public.
Learning Specialist | DEI Ally | Crypto User | Web3 Explorer | I create 21st century LX for empowerment
4 年Insightful reopening guideline. Interesting to see museums and book stores ranking least important way behind casinos. How would this graphic change if a cultural capital variable would be added alongside consumer preferences and net profit...?