Where to now for Ukraine?
Last week, U.S. President Joe Biden gave the long-awaited green light for Ukraine to use long-range, U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles to conduct strikes in Russian territory. It was the latest instance in which Ukraine’s request for advanced weapons systems was met only after months of deliberation from the White House.?
That approach “has opened Biden up to criticism from all sides,” Foreign Policy’s Amy Mackinnon wrote in last week’s Situation Report on Biden’s legacy in Ukraine.
One such criticism in Foreign Policy comes from Jennifer Kavanagh, a senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities. Biden’s gambit on ATACMS will fail for the same reason that his broader Ukraine policy has, Kavanagh writes: because “there has never been a sustainable way for Washington to fuel its partner to total victory over Russia.” In “New Missiles Won’t Change Ukraine’s Broken War Math,” Kavanagh argues that U.S. President-elect Donald Trump should learn from Biden’s mistakes by urging Ukraine to adopt a “defense-only strategy.”
Matthew Duss, a former foreign-policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders, and Robert Farley, an assistant professor at the University of Kentucky, go one step further. “If Trump makes good on his promise to end the war, supporters of Ukraine must be clear about the principles at stake and be careful not to let maximalist aims foreclose a durable negotiated settlement,” they argue. In “It’s Time For Ukraine to Make the Best Peace It Can,” Duss and Farley outline what that settlement might entail.
Though security issues should not be overlooked, political scientist Eugene Finkel urges a longer view. “Identity, not security, has historically been the main driver of Russian aggression,” he writes, adding, “The sticking point is not Ukrainian policy but Russian perceptions of Ukraine and its right to exist as a sovereign state.” In “The Only Way to Achieve Lasting Peace in Ukraine,” an excerpt from Finkel’s book, he proposes ways that both Ukraine and the rest of the world can work to change Russian attitudes.—Amelia Lester, deputy editor
P.S. During our Black Friday Sale, save $100 on an FP Insider subscription—our top tier of access. In addition to all of the insightful geopolitical analysis that comes with an FP subscription, you’ll get additional benefits such as Insider-only articles, ad-free browsing, exclusive dispatches from global events, FP Live transcripts, a free gift subscription, a direct line to FP editors, and more. Subscribe today.
New & Noteworthy
FP Live
Subscriber Exclusive: What’s Wrong With Our Environmental Politics?
On Demand Nov. 26
FP’s Cameron Abadi is the author of the new book Climate Radicals: Why Our Environmental Politics Isn’t Working, which documents how two countries, Germany and the United States, have taken contrasting paths toward mitigating climate change. What lessons can the world learn from these approaches? Join FP Live for a discussion on the book as well as takeaways from this year’s U.N. Climate Change Conference, or COP29, and predictions about U.S. environmental policy under President-elect Donald Trump. Join FP to watch on demand.
Chip Wars in a Trump 2.0 World
Dec. 12, 2024? |? 12:00 p.m. ET
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump proposed new tariffs on China as a centerpiece of his campaign. What will this mean for whoever wins the battle over producing the best semiconductors and controlling the supply chains that serve as a pipeline to dominance? How will the United States be positioned in navigating the chip wars under Trump? FP’s Ravi Agrawal will bring these questions to Chris Miller, the author of the bestselling book, Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology. They will discuss the effectiveness of tariffs, the state of global semiconductor competition, and the other major players in the race for these technologies. Register here and submit your questions in advance if you’re an FP subscriber.
Exercise Your Mind
Tens of thousands of people gathered outside the New Zealand Parliament in Wellington last Tuesday to protest a controversial bill that would do what?
A. Ban the purchase of new gas-powered cars starting in 2025
B. Lessen restrictions on semiautomatic firearms
C. Reinterpret a 184-year-old treaty with the country’s Indigenous Maori people
D. Turn over three national parks to private ownership
You can find the answer to this question and learn more at the end of this email.
Most Popular
From Around FP
Answer: C. The treaty is the legal basis for many of the rights achieved by the Maori; the bill seeking to upend it is unlikely to pass, FP’s Alexandra Sharp reports in World Brief. Test your knowledge of last week’s world news with more quiz questions.
Customer Success Advocate | Digital Culture Enthusiast | Partner Enablement | Staff Augmentation | Resource Management | PMO | Empowered and Evolving Leader | Strategic Thinker | Progress—Focused Trailblazer
3 天前?? I have a question that’s been on my mind, and I’m eager to ask: Do you want a 'war of the century,' or would you prefer 'peace' — something far more valuable and lasting? ?? With the escalating tensions between Ukraine, NATO, the US, and Russia, the use of advanced weaponry like British Storm Shadow missiles and ATACMS against RUSSIA has only fueled retaliatory measures, such as RUSSIA testing nuclear-capable hypersonic missiles, which is a nuclear-capable weapon Oreshnik incredibly hard to detect on any radars because of its speed. EVERYONE knows that, Both Nations are GLOBAL SUPERPOWERS, and their conflict could have CATASTROPHIC CONSEQUENCES for the WORLD. Is the solution really war, or is PEACE the path we need to prioritize before it’s too late? Or are we counting on Elon Musk to relocate us all to MARS at his expense before the real war takes place? ?? ?? We stand for 'global prosperity', where everyone thrives in this new era of technology. War is an outdated concept of resentment, wasting valuable time and resources. The world is filled with incredible people— it just takes the right mindset to recognize and embrace this truth. ?? Thank you Foreign Policy ?? ??
Next Trend Realty LLC./wwwHar.com/Chester-Swanson/agent_cbswan
3 天前Very helpful.
--
3 天前I think we have to redefine how it will resolve. Clearly the vision of the war ending soon is what we all envisioned. Peace talks, ceasefires, and how we can negotiate land, save lives, and?save the children of remain structurally resilient in our nation and abroad. It's the conversation we are all having globally.? It's the reflective voices we all share on how we resolve war.