WHERE HAS THE EMPATHY GONE? WHERE ARE THE EVANGELICALS AND CHRISTIANITY? HAS GREED LED US TO COMMIT CULPABLE HOMICIDE? MANSLAUGHTER MAYBE?

A DISCUSSION PAPER: ARE COUNTRIES LOOKING INWARD, ISOLATIONISM, BECAUSE WE ARE LOSING EMPATHY.. WE WORRY ABOUT ROBOTS WHO CANNOT FEEL, ARE TAKING OVER THE WORLD BUT WE ARE BECOMING THOSE ROBOTS AS MUCH AS THEY ARE BECOMING US  -- SELF INTEREST BEATS EMPATHY.        

The Implications of America's Reduction in International Assistance andForeign AID

Introduction?The United States has every right to scrutinize its spending and efficiency in national contributions to international aid and health programs. While fiscal responsibility is essential, another principle comes into play when considering the ramifications of abruptly cutting international assistance. The consequences of such decisions can be devastating, particularly for individuals who rely on these programs for survival.

Humanitarian Impact?One of the most significant concerns is the immediate humanitarian impact of cutting international assistance. Many people who depend on programs like drug testing and food aid are left without alternatives, facing dire consequences. The abrupt withdrawal of support leaves them vulnerable, with little time to find other means of survival. This situation reflects a loss of Empathy by the American people, mirroring a broader decline in global Empathy, often attributed to social media and rising isolationism.

Moreover, the loss of the evangelical Christian foundation within American society is apparent. Evangelicals, who once played a significant role in supporting humanitarian efforts, seem to have distanced themselves from the principles of compassion and charity. This shift is troubling, as it suggests a departure from the core values many evangelical Christians have historically upheld.

Isolationism and Empathy?The trend of decreasing Empathy is consistent with the development of isolationism, exemplified by President Donald Trump's policies. This shift towards inward-focused policies raises concerns that Trump's views may represent a significant portion of the American psyche. The implications are profound, as they suggest a waning commitment to global humanitarian efforts and a growing detachment from the struggles of those outside national borders.

Negligent or Intentional Harm?A critical aspect of the reduction in international assistance is the ethical and legal implications of such actions. Having taken on the responsibility of providing treatment and support through contracts, America bears a duty of care to those relying on these services. Abruptly withdrawing support without providing alternatives or sufficient time for affected individuals to seek other solutions constitutes a grave oversight. The foreseeable result of these actions—the potential loss of life—amounts to culpable negligence or, in severe cases, manslaughter.

Analogy:?Consider the analogy of adopting and caring for a child, then suddenly refusing to feed or care for the child. Even worse, it's like letting the child see the food and removing the plate before the child can eat. Financial scrutiny is necessary, but where is the Empathy that was once part of the American fabric? Even more critically, where are the hearts of the evangelicals who make up much of Trump's support? Authentic Christianity in the USA seems to be dead.

Mens Rea and Accountability?In legal terms, mens rea refers to the intent or knowledge of wrongdoing. If the United States knew or should have known that withdrawing support would likely result in the deaths of many, this action could be considered negligent homicide. If there was an intentional desire to cause harm, it could be classified as murder. Regardless of the legal classification, the moral responsibility remains clear: such actions are ethically indefensible.

Conclusion?While fiscal scrutiny is essential, balancing financial considerations with humanitarian responsibilities is crucial. The abrupt reduction in international assistance by the United States has far-reaching and potentially deadly consequences for vulnerable populations. It reflects a troubling decline in Empathy and a shift towards isolationism, raising significant ethical and legal concerns. As a global leader, America must recognize its responsibility to support those in need and uphold its commitments to international humanitarian efforts. Failing to do so undermines the nation's moral standing and endangers countless lives, making it imperative to reassess and address these critical issues.

We can work towards a more compassionate and responsible approach to international aid by addressing these concerns and acknowledging the ethical implications.

?

?