Where does political power come from?

Where does political power come from?

Political power comes from he who casts the largest shadow. It is clear that the polis (the group of individuals who come together to serve a common purpose) is held together by a force. This force is power. But what is the exact cause of power? Where does political power come from? Any state, at any point of time, is held together by power. For without this power, there cannot be a state. And without a state, society turns to the state of nature: devoid of common wealth.

By learning the origin and source of power, a man is better equipped to control his destiny. Without power, there is no freedom.

In short, political power comes from God. By God, we mean the sum total of every cause and effect that has, is or will come to life. This stands in contrast to sovereignty and the people. Naturally, this follows the observable principles of the natural laws.

Political power does not come from the sovereign. By the sovereign, we mean the government of any state. Many arguments have been made in history to the appeal to sovereign authority; perhaps the most famous of all King Louis XIV’s chant ‘L’état c’est moi’ (I am the state). However, as the French Revolution of 1789, and the precedent set by all revolts against sovereigns tell us — from experience or from analogy — appeals to authority do not equate to political power. Besides an example of sophistical equivocation, and so an apparent rather than a real argument, an appeal to sovereign authority relies on the letter of the law. Sovereign authority is a legalistic appeal to political power. But words have no power compared to man and his will power. Think of the countless signs that are ignored by men in order to achieve their private aims, or in fiction the victory of Queen Cersei against Lord Stark’s custody of the succession will. A piece of paper is only as valuable as the army behind it. And that army expects to be paid well. So political power does not come from sovereign authority.

In addition to sovereign authority, claims are often made that political power comes from the people. By the people, we mean the citizens or subjects of any state who play no part in the deliberations or judgements of the state’s affairs. They may be noblemen as much as agricultural labourers. Thomas Hobbes makes a very strong argument that the sovereign is only in power by the consent of the people, and that this consent is as valid in the form of free elections as it is in the absence of insurrection. We may say that this principle appears to hold true today in England as much as it does in Arabia or China. Nevertheless, there is a fallacy with this argument. It fails because it equates popular consent to political power. The people do not decide who has political power, the übermensch does. For even if the people wished for another form of constitution, as the Russians did in the old Empire before the Soviet Union, it is not their consent, their cries for change that led to change. If this were so, every protest would lead to regular change of political power, and yet, in England, which has had many protests throughout the centuries, the constitution holds practically unchanged since 1066. Neither is it the crackle of musketry, the execution of political leaders nor the seizure of the means of production that determines political power. Therefore, political power does not come from the people.

Instead of the sovereign or the people, political power lies in God. At first, this seems similar to the appeal to sovereign authority: only the authority is now more ambiguous than before. And yet, if we define God as the sum of all causes and effects in the universe, then we can begin to see the truth of this claim. For if all matter in life was removed, we may say that cause and effect, aside from the principle of non contradiction, is the essence of life. The existence and operation of these two principles are the foundational truths of all truths in life. In political terms, the power of the state depends on the truth. And so, it is not the people but the man who grasps fully the principle of cause and effect, and uses it to his full advantage, who secures political power. Alexander the Great was one; Julius Caesar another; Napoleon Bonaparte a third. They secured political power against sovereigns and peoples alike because they learnt this forbidden truth. As the old epithet goes, ‘Victory in war does not depend on numbers or mere courage; only skill and discipline will ensure it’. It is a man’s skill and discipline in the art of cause and effect, applied to all the arts and sciences, that secures political power in any state.

Political power, therefore, depends on God. Legalists will continue to worship sovereign authority, whilst others, in some cases forgivably, point to the people. It is neither. Only the purity and cold truth of God secures political power against the sophistical entanglements of sovereign and people. Accept and agree to this truth, and political power — freedom — will be yours. Ignore it, and sacrifice your life at your own peril. Serve God, obey the natural law, live for freedom.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Christian Alexander Pitt的更多文章

  • Sacred Equity, or Why Equity is not as long as the Chancellor's foot and how practitioners can make use of it

    Sacred Equity, or Why Equity is not as long as the Chancellor's foot and how practitioners can make use of it

    On equity rests the good fortune of the Realm. Since its inception around the 13th century, equity has always remained…

  • What exactly is a knight?

    What exactly is a knight?

    What exactly is a knight? Throughout European civilisation, knights have had the same essence: a warrior characterised…

  • What is the best form of government?

    What is the best form of government?

    The best government is the one that survives. Since 1066, in essence at least, England continues to have the same…

  • On the present dichotomy of nobility

    On the present dichotomy of nobility

    Discussion of nobility is the most important of all. The danger of avoiding it threatens the fabric of civilisation.

  • What is history for?

    What is history for?

    Throughout time, history has served many purposes. The recounting of past events, actions and intentions has been as…

  • A Vision for Sussex

    A Vision for Sussex

    The time for Sussex to unite has come. Whilst I am unfamiliar to the Council, the importance of what I have to say (and…

  • On crime: mala in se and mala prohibita

    On crime: mala in se and mala prohibita

    Let us now examine the criminal law. In any jurisdiction, there are two categories of crime: mala in se and mala…

  • On the ethical perceptions

    On the ethical perceptions

    How a man sees the world determines how he will act in it. Perception is the first step of an action, decision or…

  • Comparison of Machiavellian and Aristotelean government

    Comparison of Machiavellian and Aristotelean government

    It is the expressed aim of individual men to achieve happiness. And this happiness of man depends on the…

  • On the sophistry of racism

    On the sophistry of racism

    Racism is today’s strongest example of sophistry. The issues which surround racism are important and affect all who are…

社区洞察