Size Matters When it Comes to Burnout
Professor Gary Martin FAIM
Chief Executive Officer, AIM WA | Emeritus Professor | Social Trends | Workplace Strategist | Workplace Trend Spotter | Columnist | Director| LinkedIn Top Voice 2018 | Speaker | Content Creator
The original article was published by Business News on 7 August, 2019. Click on the article to view the original version.
IT IS arguably the number one topic on the long list of thorny education issues to have divided policymakers, academics, school leaders, teachers, parents and even students over the past 50 years – the ideal classroom size.
At the heart of this split is a set of highly regarded studies, which have concluded that smaller classes enhance student learning, that sit alongside equally reputable research suggesting the number of students in each class has no measurable impact on learning outcomes.
Beyond conflicting research reports, many school leaders, teachers and parents adopt the view that students learn more and teachers can be more effective in smaller classes, based on the notion they allow greater individual attention.
Regardless of what might seem bleedingly obvious to most school leaders – that smaller class sizes are more conducive to student learning – there is another and equally compelling reason to jump on the small-class-size bandwagon: teachers and their workload.
Just survey your own common sense on what will eventually happen if, in order to get more bang for your educational buck, you load up teachers with extra students to the point the teachers feel overburdened and overworked – the answer is burnout.
It is common these days to hear teachers bandy about the ‘burnout’ buzzword, particularly when they are feeling stretched, undervalued or irritated.
In fact, school leaders hear it so often you could hardly blame them for becoming desensitised to the term or even dismissive of it.
But for many teachers and school leaders, burnout is very real – so much so that the World Health Organisation (WHO) has re-classified the condition from “a problem related to life management” to describing it asan “occupational phenomenon”. WHO says the re-classification portrays burnout more appropriately as a work-based syndrome caused by chronic stress.
WHO says the broad characteristics of burnout include feelings of depleted energy levels, increasing disengagement form one’s work, feelings of negativity and cynicism, and reduced professional competency.
Drill down on the symptoms and you will discover teachers afflicted with burnout might feel that their work is unrecognised and undervalued.
Teachers might experience physical complaints such as headaches, illness or backache along with accelerated rates of absenteeism. They might pull away from their colleagues, students and parents in an emotional sense.
School leaders must be constantly vigilant when it comes to the risk factors often associated with teacher burnout, which include an overwhelming workload and navigating hostile environments – such as managing difficult students and responding to aggressive parents.
They need to avoid the common trap that many fall into of adopting a simplistic view and falsely believing a two-week school holiday vacation period will fix a bout of burnout. Burnout is far more complicated than that.
And part of our teacher burnout problem in schools is that we tend to glorify workaholism.
We continue to applaud the teacher who works the 12-hour school day, who continues their working spree well into the weekend, and who fronts up to the classroom during school breaks – even though it is well known that workaholism is the enemy of self-care.
The latest Riley Report, known more formally as The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey,has made clear that school leaders as a group experience high levels of burnout.
The challenge for all school leaders is that not only must they grasp the notion of self-care and take steps to avoid their own burnout, they must also take decisive steps to reduce the likelihood of burnout of those in their care – their teachers and support staff.
With burnout in the WHO spotlight, school leaders have a new opportunity to step up and consider how – collectively – they can respond to what appears to be a growing epidemic in our schools.
It starts with looking at ways to reduce the workload and includes reconsidering the issue of class sizes, developing appropriate support mechanisms and building a school culture that promotes self-care.
PhD Candidate | Complex Systems | Adaptive Leadership | Published Researcher | Healthcare sector focus
5 年Important topic for both educators and scholar communities. Readjusting class sizes although a great initiative will take intense planing and possibly a lot more time. Far less complex is the staff self-care and culture piece. It would be assumed that most schools have this in place already?
NAATI Certified Interpreter & Translator (Arabic <=> English) Freelance
5 年A great article, hopefully school leaders will take notice and implement.
Emotional Intelligence | Speaker | Published Author | Workshop | Programs | [email protected]
5 年You raise a really valid topic here Professor Gary Martin FAIM FACE! In the workforce, we generally try to keep direct reports below 10 given the time it takes to lead, inspire and manage each person yet school classrooms are more than triple that. Imagine the difference small classes would make for everyone! Our kids are at private school and still have classes of up to 32!
How to eliminate the deep exhaustion of burnout … permanently … is what I can show you. If regaining your energy , sleep , health and enjoyment in life sounds good but feels unreachable … book a call with me
5 年The size of class that is ideal depends on the subject , the behaviour of the pupils and the teacher - surely?
As the founder of InvestorKit, I’m here to help you cut through the noise & invest with confidence. My team & I will ensure your property portfolio outperforms the market, empowering you to scale your wealth efficiently.
5 年Great article Professor Gary Martin FAIM FACE