When Founders Need Referrals to Meet Investors, Fix This About Your Startup Ecosystem
In a well-functioning startup ecosystem, founders should know who their potential investors are and how to connect with them. In a supportive startup ecosystem, founders should know how to develop ventures that attract attention, supported by journalists and ecosystem leaders who promote fundable startups, so that investors engage them. Yet, we often see founders struggling to get even a foot in the door with venture capitalists or angel investors, leaning heavily on referrals or “warm introductions ” just to pitch their business. For economic development professionals, community builders, startup development organizations, and startup ecosystem leaders, this dependency on referrals is a red flag. It signals that something is amiss—not just with how founders are preparing, but also in how the ecosystem is cultivating relationships and support structures between investors and entrepreneurs.
A Transparent Ecosystem: The Ideal Starting Point
In an effective ecosystem, investors aren’t hidden behind opaque networks, unreachable unless you know someone who knows someone. Instead, they’re visible, active, and engaged with the community, speaking at events, mentoring, and serving as advisors to startup support programs. Angel investors and venture capitalists should be known figures who openly communicate their thesis — their area of interest, the kind of founders they look to invest in, and the qualities they consider most important in a business.
But if founders are left scrambling for introductions, there’s a disconnect in the ecosystem. Either investors aren’t making themselves available and known, the channels promoting founders are underdeveloped, or founders are poorly mentored so as to create ventures that attract attention. The result is a dysfunctional ecosystem where founders are left without essential guidance, and investors risk missing out on viable ventures simply because they lack direct, meaningful connections with the people they’re supposed to support.
Founders Need Education on Building Fundable Ventures
While investors need to make themselves accessible, founders must also be educated on what it means to be “investment-ready.” Many ecosystems fail to adequately mentor founders on the basics of building a venture that’s fundable. Teaching a founder to be “investment-ready” isn’t just about a validated MVP, financial projections, or an idea . It includes comprehensive guidance on how to communicate their vision effectively, market the business (including to investors), and create a story compelling enough to attract attention.
If a startup can’t captivate its customers, it’s unlikely to capture the interest of investors. A founder needs to understand that, in a way, “marketing” for capital is as essential as marketing for customers. Building a venture that attracts capital requires intentional development, clear communication, and a story that conveys not only the founder’s vision but also the tangible growth potential of the business. Unfortunately, many founders stumble here, and ecosystems often miss the opportunity to equip them with these critical skills.
The Referral Trap: A Symptom of Poor Ecosystem Dynamics
When investors rely on warm introductions, it can indicate a deeper issue: that they are either unsure of their investment criteria, unwilling to take an active role in discovering talent, or simply disconnected from the community. Investors who depend on referrals to vet startups are essentially outsourcing their due diligence to others, which is a dangerous approach to finding viable investments.
Reliance on referrals can also suggest that investors may lack a clear network or are ineffective at communicating with the local community. If investors aren’t seen or known, it could mean they aren’t actively networking or establishing a visible presence in the local startup scene. For the ecosystem, this is a sign that community-building efforts must strengthen the bridge between investors and startups. Investors should feel confident and well-prepared to qualify a startup based on transparent and specific criteria, not hearsay.
The Real Cost of Poor Networking and Communication
For founders, failing to prioritize marketing and effective communication is costly. A founder who does not know how to market their startup — especially to potential investors — is unlikely to get very far. Marketing for capital should be as routine as marketing for sales, yet many founders don’t consider networking, relationship-building, and creating engaging content as essential parts of their journey.
We should question why certain “helpful” events and support efforts are so prevalent in the first place.
When we see constant demo days or networking events where founders are asked to pitch to investors, we should ask why those events are even necessary. If the ecosystem were functioning as it should, such events wouldn’t be a primary strategy for connecting founders with capital. The frequency of these pitch events suggests that something’s missing : either the community isn’t adequately supporting its founders, investors aren’t actively engaging, or founders are being misled into thinking these events are the only path to funding. Instead of being genuine opportunities to nurture relationships, these events often serve as Band-Aids over a broken pipeline. When founders are regularly funneled through pitch events, it reveals an ecosystem where investors are on the sidelines, founders lack the education to navigate connections, or both.
In a truly collaborative ecosystem, pitch events should be rare, reserved for showcasing matured relationships and ventures rather than as routine crutches to force connections. A healthy startup environment isn’t defined by how many pitch events or demo days it holds but by how naturally and frequently investors and founders connect outside of these structured arenas.
By addressing this disconnect, ecosystems can shift away from surface-level solutions and work toward a deeper integration, where founders are empowered to reach investors directly and investors are engaged and actively contributing to the ecosystem. This fundamental change benefits everyone and fosters a stronger, more transparent community.
Moving Towards an Open and Functional Ecosystem
For economic developers and community builders, the call to action is clear: Create a culture of openness, mentorship, and accessibility within your startup ecosystem. Here’s what that means in practice:
In a thriving startup ecosystem, there’s no need for referral-only introductions to investors, which is not to say they’re bad but rather they’re a leading indicator that your community should be doing something more effectively. Founders and investors should meet at the intersection of transparency, networking, and skill-building. For investors, involvement and clarity of purpose create a more reliable pipeline of opportunities. For founders, prioritizing communication, marketing, and network-building leads to meaningful connections and increases their chances of securing the right investment.
By addressing these gaps, startup ecosystems can create a culture where introductions aren’t necessary, and relationships flourish organically — laying a solid foundation for a supportive, accessible, and thriving community.
Strategic Startup Advisor turned Fitness Pro Investor
1 周Pitch Days in particular are mainly for community building, safe place for founders to get feedback or future foundersto get inspired, and for founders a way to find new hires, partners, or maybe even investors. Most founders go into pitch events hoping to get feedback or getting their startups out there. However, demo days are the ones who do promise connecting with investors. Founders DO go into demo days expecting investment and this is where an ecosystem should be judge since it's actively the accelerators and venture studios who have "boards of investors" who ultimately decide to invest. These are usually in most ecosystem gate keepers. If anything, an ecosystem without events like open mics, pitch feedback events, is one that's broken since there's no resources for founders to connect with others who are essentially in their same boat, fighting the same fight.
Serial Entrepreneur & Mentor for Startups ?? Specialising in Idea Validation and Product-Market Fit
2 周I agree on one level but founders who really need outside money to seed their business are going to take a chance with investors even if if they know they are not quite the right fit. This is a waste of investors time which is why they like screening processes such as warm intros. We need a better system for the match making process.
Opinions are purely my own; not AI, not hyped-up or watered down to increase engagement, add followers, etc
2 周If that's happening, is it even an ecosystem?
?? Co-founder & researcher at Raftur Games - Revolutionizing the Future of Game Development ??
2 周I still need more connections to investors - also ones who don’t say no to games ??
Virtual CMO and Go-to-Market Builder for Video Tech Companies
2 周"The best entrepreneurs are never satisfied with the status quo." - Steve Blank Consider how you can disrupt the traditional investor-founder dynamic. Instead of chasing warm intros, focus on building a compelling narrative and demonstrating traction. Create content that attracts investors naturally, positioning yourself as a thought leader in your space.