When exceptions cloud your judgment: a guide to Correlation analysis in GMAT

Have you ever looked at a dataset and felt confident about spotting a correlation, only to have a few outliers make you second-guess yourself? You're not alone. This common challenge trips up even well prepared GMAT test-takers, especially when analyzing Data Interpretation questions involving correlation analysis.

The Expensive Misconception

When analyzing relationships between variables, most test-takers fall into a dangerous trap: they search for perfect patterns. This seemingly logical approach can cost you crucial points on test day. Let's uncover why, and more importantly, how to get these questions right.

Official GMAT Question: Where Most Go Wrong

Consider this data set from an official GMAT question. Are the values in Set 1 and 2 positively correlated?

?? PS: About 70% of students falter on this question.

The answer to this question is Yes- Values in Set 1 and Set 2 are positively correlated**. Confused?** Let’s solve it together.

However, before we do that, let’s understand what correlation actually means.

Understanding True Correlation

Correlation is a statistical measure that describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. It indicates how much two variables tend to change together.

For example:

• Height and weight typically have a positive correlation
• Temperature and heating costs typically have a negative correlation
• Your shoe size and favorite color likely have no correlation

Now, let's debunk the myths that lead to wrong answers:

What Correlation Is NOT:

1. ? A perfect relationship where every pair must follow the pattern
2. ? A rule with a maximum number of allowed exceptions
3. ? A requirement for proportional changes

What Correlation IS:

1. ? A general tendency for variables to move together
2. ? An overall pattern that allows for exceptions
3. ? Measured on a scale from -1 (perfect negative) to +1 (perfect positive)

?

Why The Data In The Official Example Shows Positive Correlation

Looking at our example holistically:

• Higher Set 1 values (4-6) generally correspond to higher Set 2 values (3-7)
• Lower Set 1 values (1-2) typically correspond to lower Set 2 values (0-3)
• The overall trend shows an upward pattern, despite some exceptions

In fact, when you plot these datapoints on a chart (you will not be required to do that during the test), you see a very strong positive correlation (~0.8)

?? Time-Saving Tip: Don't waste time counting exceptions. Focus on the overall pattern.

Key Takeaways

Remember: Approach correlation questions with confidence. You're not looking for perfect patterns—you're identifying tendencies. This mindset shift alone can significantly improve your accuracy on these questions.

Here are things that you need to keep in mind.

1. Focus on overall trends, not individual exceptions
2. Look at data holistically, not pair by pair
3. Remember: correlation ≠ perfection
4. Trust the general pattern over specific contradictions

Share your correlation analysis challenges in the comments. Having trouble with a specific question type? Post it below, and let's solve it together.