When Brands Lose Their Way
Vivek Bapat
Senior Marketing Leader (CMO/SVP) | Board Member | Executive Advisor to CXO’s
In the age of hyper-connectivity, consumers are increasingly sensitive to the authenticity and alignment between the brand’s values, core positioning and audiences.
When a single tweet or post can call out such disconnects and create viral conversations that erode hard earned brand equity it’s increasingly important for companies to tread carefully when crafting their brand strategies and campaigns.
Three recent examples that have sparked debates about inauthenticity are Coca-Cola’s AI-generated ad campaign, Jaguar’s rebranding initiative, and Bud Light’s polarizing partnership campaign. All have raised questions about the importance of staying true to a brand’s core message and values.
Coca-Cola’s AI Ad: Tech over Touch
Coca-Cola’s brand identity has long been synonymous with joy, togetherness, and the simplicity of human connection. Their iconic "Share a Coke" campaign and heartwarming holiday ads have created emotional ties with consumers for decades. However, their recent AI-generated advertisement left many feeling perplexed and disconnected.
The campaign, intended to showcase the brand’s innovation and embrace of AI technology, felt overly mechanical and lacked the human touch that Coca-Cola’s audience expects in the context of the upcoming Christmas season, a holiday that celebrates the quintessential human spirit of giving and togetherness. While the visuals were stunning and technologically impressive, the narrative seemed hollow. The ad focused more on the capabilities of AI rather than reinforcing the brand’s core values of community and shared experiences. For a company that thrives on emotional connection, this pivot towards a tech-driven approach felt out of character, and an attempt to jump on the trendy AI bandwagon rather than an authentic expression of their brand ethos.
It’s a cautionary tale about the importance of ensuring that innovative campaigns stay anchored in a brand’s foundational values.
Jaguar’s Rebranding: Heritage Erased
Jaguar, a brand steeped in heritage and known for its quintessentially British luxury and performance, recently unveiled a rebranding initiative that has been met with mixed reactions. The new logo, a minimalist design paired with a push toward electric vehicles and a modern aesthetic, aims to position Jaguar as a cutting-edge luxury automaker for the future driven by EV. However, many long-time fans and critics feel the rebranding lacks the charisma and legacy that made Jaguar an iconic name in the first place.
The shift toward minimalism, while aligned with broader design trends, has stripped the logo of its dynamic and powerful identity. The iconic leaping jaguar—a symbol of grace, speed, and precision—has been subdued to the point of being almost unrecognizable. Furthermore, the messaging accompanying the rebrand focuses heavily on a futuristic vision without adequately bridging the gap to Jaguar’s storied past. For a brand that has always balanced innovation with tradition, this rebranding effort feels like an overcorrection.
领英推荐
In an attempt to appeal to younger, environmentally conscious consumers, Jaguar risks alienating its loyal base—those who value the brand for its rich history and distinctive personality. Authenticity, in this case, means evolving without abandoning the qualities that make a brand unique.
Bud Light’s Polarizing Campaign: Misjudging the Audience
Bud Light, a brand synonymous with fun, casual drinking and broad appeal, recently faced backlash over a campaign that many perceived as inauthentic. In an effort to broaden its appeal and align with more progressive values, Bud Light partnered with a social media influencer whose audience demographic sharply contrasted with its traditional customer base.
While the intention behind the campaign—inclusivity—is admirable, the execution felt disconnected from the brand’s identity and alienated its core audience. The backlash was swift, with many loyal customers accusing the brand of pandering and abandoning its roots. Sales declined, and the company’s attempts to walk back the campaign only fueled further criticism, as it appeared reactionary rather than principled.
A 15K misstep that cost the brand over 27B USD in brand equity underscores the importance of understanding your audience deeply and ensuring that any attempt to evolve aligns with the brand’s core values. For Bud Light, the challenge lay in balancing inclusivity with the identity that had made it a household name.
The Takeaway: True Innovation never compromises on Authenticity
Coca-Cola, Jaguar, and Bud Light highlight a key lesson for brands: innovation must be balanced with authenticity. Embracing new technologies, evolving with the times, and expanding inclusivity are necessary, but not at the expense of losing sight of what makes a brand resonate with its audience.
When Coca-Cola chose AI as the centerpiece of its campaign, it neglected the emotional storytelling that defines its brand. Similarly, Jaguar’s rebranding, while forward-thinking, failed to honor the legacy that has been its backbone for decades. Meanwhile, Bud Light’s campaign, despite good intentions, misjudged its audience’s expectations and loyalty.
Brands should remember that their value propositions and core messages are their north stars. Any deviation, no matter how trendy or innovative, must still reflect the essence of who they are. Otherwise, they risk creating a disconnect with their audience—a costly mistake in today’s competitive landscape.
As these cases show, authenticity isn’t just a buzzword; it’s the foundation of trust and loyalty. For brands navigating the complexities of change, staying true to their values is the surest way to maintain relevance without losing their identity.
Sr. Digital Innovation and Sales Field Strategist at SAP Concur | AI Innovator | SAP Catalyst | Corporate Social Responsibility Advocate
2 个月I saw the coca-cola commercial and was so disappointed because it screamed AI! It really was overwhelming awkward to watch.
Thanks a lot, Vivek, for the always insightful article! It got me thinking, and I’d love your thoughts on this: with consumer attention spans becoming increasingly fragmented and the fast-paced digital world, are brands feeling more encouraged to create buzz with less concern for long-term consequences? It seems like companies are building hype without as much fear of lasting damage. Even when brands find themselves at the center of consumer outrage—like we saw with the Bud Light boycott—the chances of suffering significant repercussions seem to be decreasing. This doesn’t undermine the importance of a strong brand, but it’s an interesting trend to consider. Another observation I have is that chasing trends can alienate a brand's core audience. For example, Jaguar’s target market isn’t TikTok teens or budget-conscious millennials; it’s high-income households. By moving away from its traditional appeal, Jaguar seems to be betting that modern luxury consumers value innovation and experience over heritage and nostalgia. While their current campaign might come off as confusing, it could be part of a larger narrative that unfolds over time, and we might be missing the nuanced strategic thinking behind these knee-jerk reactions. ???
Senior Director @ SAP | Executive Leadership, Strategic Thinking
2 个月Thank you Vivek, very insightful
Product marketing executive helping companies make work life better for their workforce.
2 个月Thoughtful and insightful perspective